• Announcements

    • StealthNuck

      Forum-specific Rules   07/11/2017

      These are board specific rules for the Trades and Rumors forum designed to provide organization and a better experience for everyone. Please review these rules before posting new threads. 
        THREAD ETIQUETTE   1. Please search for an existing thread before posting. This forum can be very fast moving, so it's understandable if redundant threads are inadvertently posted. In such a case, please use the report feature to request removal of redundant threads.    2. Provide a clearly identifiable topic title so that users can readily understand the content. The title should include any and all teams involved, as well as player names or other personnel involved as appropriate.   3. All trades, signings, rumors and other news MUST include a linkable source. Simply posting the name of the source is not enough. Effort should also be made to copy and paste the full article, or at the very least the relevant portion of text from the source to the first post of the thread. Moderators may remove low-quality threads in favour of high-quality threads. 

      Affixed to the front of your title should be a label that identifies the type of transaction that is taking place. For all trades use [TRADE]. For all signings use [SIGNING]. For all waiver-wire transactions use [WAIVERS]. For all rumours use [RUMOUR].
      For articles or news items that don't fit into the above categories, affix an appropriate label of your choice such as [NEWS], [ARTICLE] or [MISC].   4. When the status of a thread changes a new thread can be created. The new thread should reflect the change and help focus the discussion on current events. e.g. Someone may create a new thread when a rumor becomes a trades. The old thread will be locked by the moderating team.    5. Do not misrepresent the contents of your thread or post false trades or rumors. Trolling will result in a permanent suspension. 

      SOURCES   The following source types are considered INVALID. Any links to posts or threads on other message boards Any links to personal blogs Any news heard on the radio that does not have a link to an audio vault or podcast Any news seen on television that does not have a link to online video Any news spread by word of mouth
      Additionally, certain sources may be be blacklisted due to poor credentials, clear traffic-mongering etc. Blacklisted sources will be posted here. 
      Thank you for your co-operation and please PM the Administrator or Moderators if you have any questions, concerns or suggestions regarding this forum.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

hockeyfan90

[Report] Sabres trying to get Ryan

69 posts in this topic

I like how this turned into a Hodgson thread. Sabres have a number of young prospects that could be moved for Ryan. That team desperately needs size and toughness, they'll pay a premium for Ryan.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Even if we had Hodgson, the simple fact that Buffalo is in the East would give a Hodgson-Ryan trade more merit than if he was in Vancouver, given that we are in the same conference.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Considering Sabers is the team I'm predicting to win the cup ... this will further help the cause of my prediction.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is Hodgson turning out to be a cancer for teams?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't buy the Hodgson is a cancer suggestions and I doubt Buffalo ownership is ready to give up on him. On the other hand, it seems like Buffalo makes the most sense, keeps him out of the West Conf and the return for him is going to be decent.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is Hodgson turning out to be a cancer for teams?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well It would have taken al least someone like Sulzer to be added to Hodgson!!! In all seriousness, MG thinks VERY highly of Kassian (in other words, Ryan +) so we will have to be patient to evaluate what he did. Give it 5-6 years.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Doesn't mean he's wrong, just means those are the offers. Only way to know if it's true is to wait for the trade to happen, and compare. That Philly offer is really nice! (If true)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know about you guys, but if I were Anaheim I would pull the trigger on that one. Too bad it doesn't include Ennis though.. The kid's a stud.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yea let's just wait and see what happens. Looks like its between Philly, Boston or Sabres. And these same people were saying that if the Boston deal happens, Ducks would probably trade Getzlaf (Most likely to the Leafs). Pretty insane offseason Anaheim would have it any of these are true! Between the Boston, Philly, and Sabres deal for Ryan which would you choose. I'd go with the Sabres deal and keep Getzlaf.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it's more so daddy. I've never heard of such an arrogant Canadian kid, or any kid for that matter, demanding everything be handed to him.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I really don't see it. He was injured and after basically being told he was faking to cover his performance, he wanted another opinion - which proved he as injured. How was that wrong?

Then when he was in our top 4 goal scorers, he was wrong to think he should get more than 12 minutes a game?That's the ice time that the plugs who can't score get. When your 4th in goals and 9th-10th in ice time among forwards, you should ask for more time, especially when you're told ice time is performance based...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I really don't see it. He was injured and after basically being told he was faking to cover his performance, he wanted another opinion - which proved he as injured. How was that wrong?

Then when he was in our top 4 goal scorers, he was wrong to think he should get more than 12 minutes a game?That's the ice time that the plugs who can't score get. When your 4th in goals and 9th-10th in ice time among forwards, you should ask for more time, especially when you're told ice time is performance based...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.