Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

TheCammer

Edler comparable to Enstrom - Eklund

46 posts in this topic

I don't consider myself a complete Canucks' homer and I feel many of the Canucks fanbase over value many of our players (we also under value many as well - Lui) but the article by Eklund today estimating that Edler is comparable to Enstrom seems off-base.

http://www.hockeybuz...r-Worth/1/45838

I don't think Edler is a Norris candidate or ever will be but I can see him being a perennial all-star. Enstrom is good steady offensive defenseman but I think he may have peaked. Maybe i haven't seen him play enough.

Thoughts?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Always thought Edler was better than Enstrom. I also think that with a healthy season and that right D-man to play with Edler that Edler could be in Norris talks eventually. But if we could get Edler for Enstrom type money, that'd be great.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They're not comparable, because they don't play the same way.

Edler is/can be a LOT more physical than Enstrom. Tobias just doesn't have the ability to hit people like Edler does. Enstrom is 5'10" 180, enough said.

Passing ability and puck movement perhaps, but that's only one dimension of the game.

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They are only comparable because, they are both in the 10-20 range of top defense men. Edler has more upside, but is still inconsistent. Contracts should be really close, Edler deserves more but hope he signs a discount.

Enstrom is more of a puck moving defense man, very smart and is reliable defensively.

Edler is more like a truck, hard hitting guy, that can put up points.

Key note is that Enstrom had an off year last year, he usually hits 50 points. Edler got 49 last year, and had an off year defensively.

Like I've said in the Enstrom re-signing, Enstrom's contract is around the range Edler's contract should be.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I really hope we get Edler at $5M at most.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This isn't even a debate.

Say what you will about who is better, but they play a very different style of game.

Terrible comparison.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not comparables. Enstrom is 5'10" 180lbs. Edler is 6'3" 215lbs. Entirely different body size and physique.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I always thought Edler was a, "lite" version of Weber. He can hit, score, make plays, defend, all at a high level. Consistency is really where he lacks in comparison to Norris calibre D-men.

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did any of you read the Eklund article? He compares them in terms of contract value, not as players.

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They're both Swedes, roughly the same age and both can be considered offensive defence men, but other than that I don't see the similarity.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Edler is better than Enstrom

That is all there is to it

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That is what I thought

This isn't even a debate.

Say what you will about who is better, but they play a very different style of game.

Terrible comparison.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did any of you read the Eklund article? He compares them in terms of contract value, not as players.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

u see edler smash foos on the boards? snipe goals from the blueline?

he's a legit norris trophy contender this upcoming season if his linemates stay healthy

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How about we get them to play together? That'd work right?

But I don't have an opinion really, I don't watch enough Jets games to know his style.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would say Enstrom has a nicer set of hands but other than that Edler is bigger, more physical, harder shot. Both are nice skaters but I would give the edge to Edler. He covers ice well and has a very efficient stride. Like I said earlier, I think Enstrom might have a bit better hands/vision but not by much. Edler has fairly nice hands and good vision too.

Overall, Edler is way more valuable and has more potential IMO. They are very different players and Eklund tends to post stupid crap like that when there is not much to talk about.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.