canucksnihilist Posted July 31, 2012 Share Posted July 31, 2012 ya, doesn't make sense. up and coming young player who cracks the line-up... they aren't usually traded. he asked to be traded, only answer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrenchKiss Posted July 31, 2012 Share Posted July 31, 2012 and its stupid to look in hindsight at a trade that will take around 5 years to determine the winner of. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canuck Surfer Posted July 31, 2012 Share Posted July 31, 2012 Don't you mean that he admitted he was covering his tail in a storm of criticism? He did say the trade was about scoring a body that made us play off ready? Then he regressed to say that it was really about the "future," as guys like Kassian don't come available to often. Then he went completely backwards and suggested he had no choice because Cody was a whiner. he was traded for a reason, Gillis already admitted that cody wanted out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gollumpus Posted August 1, 2012 Share Posted August 1, 2012 as soon as Gillis said he wanted to trade for win now, we know now that we were not the winners since we lost our secondary scoring at the second of cody left the team and we lost in first round. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeanBeef Posted August 1, 2012 Share Posted August 1, 2012 You knw what would be a great five man unit? Grabner-Hodgson-Kassian Ballard-O'Brien Powerforward-Kassian (Bertuzzi) Sniper-Grabner (Naslund) Playmaker-Hodgson (Morrison) 2-way mobile defenseman-Ballard Physical defensive dman-O'Brien Sedin-Sedin-Burrows Higgins-Kesler-Booth Grabner-Hodgson-Kassian Malhotra-Lapierre-Hansen Hamhuis-Bieksa Edler-Garrison Ballard-O'Brien ... Oh wait Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baggins Posted August 1, 2012 Share Posted August 1, 2012 You knw what would be a great five man unit? Grabner-Hodgson-Kassian Ballard-O'Brien Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarthMelvin Posted August 1, 2012 Share Posted August 1, 2012 Nope sorry DISAGREE~! Kelser been prone to injury and most likely missing the beginning of this seaason AGAIN...and starting as a "try hard" again to get back into the game before he is even 100% AGAIN, will most likely cause him to be a lack luster player and pouty baby like last season and therefore put on the fourth line as Hodge woulda bin on the 2nd or 3rd line with others. BOOM~! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coolcat13 Posted August 1, 2012 Share Posted August 1, 2012 Not really a hindsight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.