Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

Hindsight: Cody and Kesler would have been the second line


jonnycanuck46

Recommended Posts

Don't you mean that he admitted he was covering his tail in a storm of criticism?

He did say the trade was about scoring a body that made us play off ready?

Then he regressed to say that it was really about the "future," as guys like Kassian don't come available to often.

Then he went completely backwards and suggested he had no choice because Cody was a whiner.

he was traded for a reason, Gillis already admitted that cody wanted out

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You knw what would be a great five man unit?

Grabner-Hodgson-Kassian

Ballard-O'Brien

Powerforward-Kassian (Bertuzzi)

Sniper-Grabner (Naslund)

Playmaker-Hodgson (Morrison)

2-way mobile defenseman-Ballard

Physical defensive dman-O'Brien

Sedin-Sedin-Burrows

Higgins-Kesler-Booth

Grabner-Hodgson-Kassian

Malhotra-Lapierre-Hansen

Hamhuis-Bieksa

Edler-Garrison

Ballard-O'Brien

... Oh wait

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope sorry DISAGREE~! Kelser been prone to injury and most likely missing the beginning of this seaason AGAIN...and starting as a "try hard" again to get back into the game before he is even 100% AGAIN, will most likely cause him to be a lack luster player and pouty baby like last season and therefore put on the fourth line as Hodge woulda bin on the 2nd or 3rd line with others.

BOOM~!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...