canucklax Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 3 of those guys were over 24 my bad. We still have had a tendancey over the past few drafts to look at the smaller player versus the ogre. I will be clear again . I feel we need even more sizer than we are currently developing. Just my personal opinion. I acknowledge the fact we have some prospective size coming our way but just not enough for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Niloc009 Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 You forgot so many more and I am plenty informed my friend. Ok I guess Kassian can be considered a prospect still has not played the required 65 games in the big show but cmon he wil be with the big club there really is no doubt of that .I do understand these guys will grow but they wont sprout 3 inches and gain 25-40 pounds after 20-21. Alex Friesen 5'9 -186 - Plays like he's 6'3", physically intimidating Evgeny Gladskikh 6'0 -186 - Not in our system Ilia Krikunov 5'11 -169 - Not in our system Jordan Schroeder 5'8 -175 - Highly skilled, dropped so low we had to take him Kellin Tokhkin 5'10 -176 - Bust Jeremy Price 6'1 -175 - Decent NHL size once he gains more muscle Henrik Tommernes 6'1 -176 - Decent NHL size once he gains more muscle Anton Rodin 6'0 -175 - Decent NHL size once he gains more muscle Micheal Davies 5'9 -179 - An undrafted 25 year old depth AHLer with a Wolves contract. Why are we mentioning him? Darren Haydar 5'10 -171 - An AHL star with a Wolves contract. Why are we mentioning him? Brad Hunt 5'9 -171 - See Davies, Michael Kevin Doell 5'11 -182 - An undrafted 33 year old depth AHLer with a Wolves contract. Why are we mentioning him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.DirtyDangles Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 Hunt, Doell, Haydar, Davies, Gladskikh, Krikunov That was half your list you got wrong kid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D-Bo7 Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 Kellan Tochkin is still a Canucks prospect. He will be turning pro this season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squeak Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 Doan ? Arnott? Uh you do seee the problem here right ? You are talking hypothetical lines here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.DirtyDangles Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 Advanced list analysis 6 Canucks contracts or Canucks rights held -3 with weight problems, can easily be fixed -2 with height problems (Schroeder is high skill, Friesen is very physical) -1 total bust 2 Players in Europe we don't have the rights to 4 AHL contracted guys that won't even be considered for the Canucks ever Please, tell me more about how informed you are about the Canucks prospect system. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squeak Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 I thought they didn't retain his rights? I'm pretty sure they let him go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avelanch Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 Section one is the meat of the criteria as it will govern the majority of players that vie for a NHL roster spot. Sections two and three are simply an acknowledgement that some prospects arrive on the scene a bit later than their peers, thus needing some time past their 24th birthday to develop into an NHL-caliber player. The graduated list on team pages will consist of players who are considered graduated to the NHL. A skater prospect may sit on the graduated list until he has played 130 games in the NHL. A goalie prospect may sit on the graduated list until he has played 90 games in the NHL. NOTE: These are general guidelines and should be followed the majority of the time but certain players may still be listed as prospects if circumstances warrant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.DirtyDangles Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 Do you notice how they are BESIDE PLAYERS THAT ARE ALREADY CANUCKS PLAYERS? Lapierre/Malhotra would be the 3rd line centre if we do not acquire Arnott. Raymond/Higgins would be the 2nd line winger if we do not acquire Doan. Kassian is going to have to earn his spot - because it would make much more sense for him to play 20 minutes a game in the AHL, then playing 4-6 minutes with Dale Weise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucklax Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 Oh all knowing all seeing NIloc the Great tell me more . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squeak Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 my quote was from section 1. i'm not sure what the hell you'r trying to get at. regardless of the fact that hockey's future would NOT count these players as prospects (which you are, for some reason trying to argue), they are still not a part of the canucks org. they have no contract with the canucks, and cannot be called up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BananaMash Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 Sarcastic or not, you better be asking someone for knowledge it's pretty obvious you have no idea of what you are talking about Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joel Heyman Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 Actually, I would be interested in the Canucks signing Hunt if he can maintain the excellent level of play that he's shown since signing with the Wolves. Solid player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avelanch Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 Are you making a mockery of my sig??????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squeak Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.DirtyDangles Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 Sarcastic or not, you better be asking someone for knowledge it's pretty obvious you have no idea of what you are talking about Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D-Bo7 Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 Don't know where you got that from - seeing as his contract was slid for the first year, and the 2011-2012 season was the first year to 'eat up' a year of contract. http://capgeek.com/p...lay.php?id=1542 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squeak Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 It actually slid the first two years according to that. I figured since we signed him before the 09/10 season that his 3 year ELC would have been up after this season. I guess I forgot about the contract slide. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucklax Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 LOL because I listed 3 -4 older guys as prospects. Get over yourself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.DirtyDangles Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 6 out of 12, just admit you're talking out of your rear end Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.