Jump to content

Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Photo

[Rumour] Canucks kicking tires on Huet


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
80 replies to this topic

#61 Hedman

Hedman

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 992 posts
  • Joined: 11-January 09

Posted 07 August 2012 - 04:49 PM

Don't. Want. Huet. At. All. Are we gonna sign a goalie that have played in the NLA for 2 years, and expect him to be our back-up? The 2 seasons before he went there, he sucked donkeyballs. Now he'll turn 37 in September, why would he be a better goalie now than he was before? I would take a guy like Dan Ellis, whose career isn't going downhill like crap, over a bum like Huet.

#62 CanucksFanMike

CanucksFanMike

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,632 posts
  • Joined: 28-September 11

Posted 07 August 2012 - 07:28 PM

i'd rather sign Dan Ellis but i think Huet could be a solid backup for schneider for one year at the right price
Posted Image
Credit to -Vintage Canuck-

#63 oldnews

oldnews

    Declining Grinder

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,677 posts
  • Joined: 30-March 11

Posted 07 August 2012 - 09:39 PM

"The Canucks are able to trade Roberto Luongo not only because they have Cory Schneider, but because Lack, 24, is ready to be a NHL backup. Lack spent the past two seasons in the American Hockey League. He won 21 games with a 2.31 goals-against average and .925 save percentage last season with the Chicago Wolves after winning 28 games with a 2.26 GAA and .926 save percentage in 2010-11 with the Manitoba Moose."

I'll trust Dave Gagner on this one. Would rather see the Canucks go with Lack than go outside and acquire another backup. He's earned a shot.

#64 Armada

Armada

    Canucks Franchise Player

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,115 posts
  • Joined: 03-February 08

Posted 07 August 2012 - 10:42 PM

Totally would want Huet.

For $1.0M its a deal.
Posted Image
______________Eat, Sleep,Posted ImageRave, Repeat

#65 Burnsey

Burnsey

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,863 posts
  • Joined: 08-July 08

Posted 08 August 2012 - 04:59 AM

decent back up with a bit of experience. Can continue to guide and be a mentor for our new starter. Always nice for a young guy like Schnieder to have a guy in the same position giving him tips. For the right price I'd be happy with it

team-canada-jarome-iginla-photo.jpg


#66 DownUndaCanuck

DownUndaCanuck

    Canucks Franchise Player

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,589 posts
  • Joined: 28-July 07

Posted 08 August 2012 - 05:11 AM

Schneider is not going to be effective if he plays anywhere near 60-70 games. He needs to play around 50 for us to even have a chance in the playoffs, because the kid has no idea what it takes to sustain a high level of play all season long as well as the playoffs.

Basically our backup needs to play 25-30 games, whoever it be, and of those 30 games he should be winning at least 15-20 of them. Schneider could have a spectacular season, rack up 30 wins in 50 games, but if the backup has a bad season the Canucks won't be a successful team. Schneider winning even 30 games and say an extra 5 OTL points gives the Canucks 65 points on the season, leaving the rest to our backup who should be able to get us 15 wins and hence around 35 points to bring us to 100 points - a Division winning season.

If our backup even plays 5 games below .500 or worse we're suddenly 10 points down which will be the difference between a Division title and 8th in the Conference. The backup's role is especially important on this team, and quite frankly, I don't trust Huet to win 15-20 games out of 30.
Posted Image

#67 Darth Kane

Darth Kane

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,681 posts
  • Joined: 07-June 09

Posted 08 August 2012 - 06:52 AM

Unless Huet has undergone a miracle transformation in Switzerland over the past 2 seasons you want no part of him. I've never seen a goalie crumble so fast as Huet did in 2010. Ellis is a much better option for back-up. Heck, Lack is a better option than Huet!

God forfid that Schneider got hurt and Huet became your starter. There'd be no more President's Trophies and you could kiss goodbye any thoughts of a long playoff run

Edited by Darth Kane, 08 August 2012 - 06:54 AM.


#68 Lonny_Bohonos_14

Lonny_Bohonos_14

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,024 posts
  • Joined: 20-January 09

Posted 08 August 2012 - 08:47 AM

Schneider is not going to be effective if he plays anywhere near 60-70 games. He needs to play around 50 for us to even have a chance in the playoffs, because the kid has no idea what it takes to sustain a high level of play all season long as well as the playoffs.

Basically our backup needs to play 25-30 games, whoever it be, and of those 30 games he should be winning at least 15-20 of them. Schneider could have a spectacular season, rack up 30 wins in 50 games, but if the backup has a bad season the Canucks won't be a successful team. Schneider winning even 30 games and say an extra 5 OTL points gives the Canucks 65 points on the season, leaving the rest to our backup who should be able to get us 15 wins and hence around 35 points to bring us to 100 points - a Division winning season.

If our backup even plays 5 games below .500 or worse we're suddenly 10 points down which will be the difference between a Division title and 8th in the Conference. The backup's role is especially important on this team, and quite frankly, I don't trust Huet to win 15-20 games out of 30.


I agree, but that said, who is available right now who you would have that kind of confidence in? I'm not sure if Roloson, Nittymaki, Ellis, or Turco could inspire that kind of confidence anymore. Lack is a possibility, but for 30 games?

Unless we get a Clemmensen or Theodore or other - we'll have to take a chance with a somewhat questionable backup.

Edited by Sweatt_GLaNDs, 08 August 2012 - 08:54 AM.

Posted Image

Credit to -Vintage Canuck-


#69 -Vintage Canuck-

-Vintage Canuck-

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 74,998 posts
  • Joined: 24-May 10

Posted 08 August 2012 - 11:15 AM

Huet’s agent, Stephen Bartlett,

“I haven’t had any substantive discussions with Vancouver about Huet specifically,” Bartlett told The Province on Tuesday. “I probably sent out a memo to all teams, including them.


“We’ve been trying to talk to every team. I haven’t had any specific discussions with Vancouver about him, just in general identifying teams that may or may not be in a position to look for goaltending, Vancouver being one of them. It’s depending on what happens with (Roberto) Luongo.”


http://www.theprovin...4314/story.html

307mg00.jpg


#70 Nucks-4-Life

Nucks-4-Life

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,069 posts
  • Joined: 14-December 06

Posted 08 August 2012 - 11:21 AM

I don't know about Huet, but we definitely need a NHL veteran as the backup goalie.

Lack needs one more year of domination in the AHL before being full time in the NHL. Hopefully AV can somehow get him some games in this year. Remember how bad Schneider was in his first 5 NHL games?

I think Lack will play most of the pre-season games and then head down to the Wolves.

#71 TheDave

TheDave

    K-Wing Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 72 posts
  • Joined: 17-July 12

Posted 08 August 2012 - 11:25 AM

Ide rather have ellis if this lack thing doesnt work out. Always been a big ellis fan.

"If he doesn't stop that one, it's goin' in!"

- Bob Cole


#72 yogolol

yogolol

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,047 posts
  • Joined: 28-December 11

Posted 08 August 2012 - 11:50 AM

Huet’s agent, Stephen Bartlett,

“I haven’t had any substantive discussions with Vancouver about Huet specifically,” Bartlett told The Province on Tuesday. “I probably sent out a memo to all teams, including them.


“We’ve been trying to talk to every team. I haven’t had any specific discussions with Vancouver about him, just in general identifying teams that may or may not be in a position to look for goaltending, Vancouver being one of them. It’s depending on what happens with (Roberto) Luongo.”


http://www.theprovin...4314/story.html


Sounds like his agent is doing all the talking and Vancouver isn't interested.
Watch my hockey tributes! http://www.youtube.c...urjesuss/videos

#73 Nicklasjensen46

Nicklasjensen46

    Comets Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 425 posts
  • Joined: 18-May 09

Posted 08 August 2012 - 12:21 PM

No harm in exploring our options. Huet, ellis, theodore, would poise as good potencial backups. And if cory gets injuried we are totally f**ked. Unless lack steals the show.

My 2012 Canucks
Sedin Sedin Burrows
Higgins Kesler Hodgson
Sturm Malhotra Hansen
Sammuelson Lapiere Oreskovich

Hamhuis Bieska
Edler Salo
Tanev Ballard
Luongo Schnieder


#74 Avicii

Avicii

    Canucks All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,363 posts
  • Joined: 02-July 07

Posted 08 August 2012 - 02:41 PM

Schneider is not going to be effective if he plays anywhere near 60-70 games. He needs to play around 50 for us to even have a chance in the playoffs, because the kid has no idea what it takes to sustain a high level of play all season long as well as the playoffs.

Basically our backup needs to play 25-30 games, whoever it be, and of those 30 games he should be winning at least 15-20 of them. Schneider could have a spectacular season, rack up 30 wins in 50 games, but if the backup has a bad season the Canucks won't be a successful team. Schneider winning even 30 games and say an extra 5 OTL points gives the Canucks 65 points on the season, leaving the rest to our backup who should be able to get us 15 wins and hence around 35 points to bring us to 100 points - a Division winning season.

If our backup even plays 5 games below .500 or worse we're suddenly 10 points down which will be the difference between a Division title and 8th in the Conference. The backup's role is especially important on this team, and quite frankly, I don't trust Huet to win 15-20 games out of 30.


:huh:

Didn't Schneider lead his team to the Calder Cup? I don't follow the AHL often but yeah, didn't he do that, when he was 2 years younger?

Is there even much of a difference for a goaltender in terms of fatigue and whatnot from the AHL to the NHL? Still facing shots, still moving around.. Not like you're gonna get hit harder or anything like forwards/defenseman.

Schneider will be fine.

Posted Image


#75 The Sedin's 6th Sense

The Sedin's 6th Sense

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,431 posts
  • Joined: 07-December 11

Posted 08 August 2012 - 04:47 PM

Luongo must be pumping his tires :bigblush:




Spoiler

Edited by The Sedin's 6th Sense, 08 August 2012 - 04:47 PM.

Posted Image




"You know what my favourite Super Bowl is? The next one."

- Tom Brady


#76 canuck cole

canuck cole

    Comets Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 120 posts
  • Joined: 16-January 12

Posted 08 August 2012 - 06:17 PM

If Lack isn't ready, then my second choice would be Ellis, then Huet. I don't want Theodore because he obviously doesn't want to play here, and an unmotivated goaltender is a bad thing

#77 juwanski

juwanski

    Comets Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 167 posts
  • Joined: 23-November 08

Posted 10 August 2012 - 01:08 AM

Explain to me how, without making several assumptions that are in no way referenced in his post, $10 million averaged over 100 annual increments could ever result in a $1.00 cap hit. I guess I should have taken whichever f***ed up math classes you've aced in your lifetime in lieu of all the calculus and advanced statistics courses I've taken in mine.


My you are a bundle of joy arn't you? It was a joke dude, whoever was gonna give Huet 10 mill a year for 10 years... also 10 mill a year *Sundin* ring a bell?

#78 Melbourne Canuck

Melbourne Canuck

    Comets Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 230 posts
  • Joined: 01-March 10

Posted 10 August 2012 - 06:57 AM

I think an experienced back up is the way to go. Lack has played less than 50 games in the AHL and although shown some promise, I think it's a risk to bring him in as a back up relatively quickly. Of the available back ups, who do the Canucks go for? I doubt its Huet. I guess Boston faces a similar decision with Thomas' recent brain fades leaving Rask to the starting job without any back up (or do they still have Turco on the books?). Unless the Canucks get a back up like Clemmenson as part of the Luongo trade, I guess they're left with guys like Ellis, Conklin, Brent Johnson or Nittymaki etc. Personally, I wouldn't mind seeing Johnson or Turco (if available) back Schneider up if we were forced to go the UFA route. I believe that Gillis will try to acquire another goalie via trade though.

#79 Martin Frk

Martin Frk

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 789 posts
  • Joined: 01-January 09

Posted 10 August 2012 - 12:06 PM

If we sign huet on a one year deal, i see no harm. Lack would benefit from one more year down in the AHL before being moved up to the big club
Posted Image
Cred to Lemons

#80 Bodee

Bodee

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,257 posts
  • Joined: 26-May 11

Posted 10 August 2012 - 12:27 PM

What was wrong with Matt Climie?.......I liked him, he was steadier than Lack in many of the games I watched.
Kevin.jpg

#81 vancitykid

vancitykid

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,116 posts
  • Joined: 11-September 03

Posted 11 August 2012 - 06:40 AM

http://www.lausannehc.ch/ just signed with a Swiss team LHC




Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.