• Announcements

    • StealthNuck

      All Threads Must Contain Tags!   07/25/2017

      ALL THREADS MUST CONTAIN TAGS   All threads in this forum must contain tags prefixed to topic titles. The purpose of the tags is to eliminate confusion in recent threads lists, and to create an organized and consistent environment. Moderators may immediately lock and thread that does not contain tags.    Tags must be placed at the start of your thread title, following this exact formatting:    [Tag] Thread Title   Here are some of the most used popular tags:    [Proposal]
      A trade, or trades, for next season, or even the off-season.
      [Off-Season]
      FA signings, off-season trades for RFA's, UFA's rights etc...
      [Value Of]
      (A question regarding a players worth, whether from another team, or the Canucks)
      [Speculation] Posting a rumor (with a source of course), but providing why it could be possible for the Canucks to land that player.   [Discussion]
      Thoughts on team trading strategy and composition.   Please feel free to create your own tag if none of these suit your thread.   

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Erik Karlsson

[Proposal] Van-Fla Van-Stl

8 posts in this topic

If Doan doesn't sign

To Van

Chris Stewart

Patrick Berglund

To St Louis

Jannik Hansen

Mason Raymond

Jordan Schroeder

1st

To Fla

Luongo

Brendan Gaunce

Sauve

To Van

Bjugstad

Keaton Ellerby

Sedin-Sedin-Stewart

Booth-Kesler-Burrows

Higgins-Berglund-Kassian

Lapierre-Malholtra-Weise

Hamhuis-Bieksa

Edler-Garrison

Tanev/Ellerby-Ballard

Schneider

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

no thanks on the STL deal (you are overrating Stewart), take out Gaunce in the FLA deal and I'd do it....

also not sure if this occured to you but we kinda sorta need a backup (you need to include a backup in your lines). I think Lack could use a year more in the AHL so signing one of Huet or Ellis would be good.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

also not sure if this occured to you but we kinda sorta need a backup (you need to include a backup in your lines).

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In my opinion, the whole point of a proposal are the trades themselves. I would say small details like the backup would be irrelevant, even if overlooked in this case.

To the OP: As far as the trades go, why would we do those trades? Why do we need Stewart when we now have Kassian and Booth? Why Berglund?

The Luongo trade I see as plausible though since Florida is unlikely going to trade Bjugstad without taking a similar player (in this case Gaunce) back.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

St. louis isn't trading Berglund unless its for an upgrade and I doubt they trade Stewart after just signing him.

Can't seee Gillis trading Gaunce right now

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you guys on Crack? Trade a top ten goalie (and yes I am a Schnieder supporter but also don't undervalue Lou) AND our first round pick for another first round pick and a dman who hasn't played a full season in the NHL?

Umm I think Lou for those two are fair and realistic, not with Gaunce. Fair enough if you thik FLA won't make the trade without it but it doesn't mean the trade makes sense.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.