• Announcements

    • StealthNuck

      Forum-specific Rules   07/11/2017

      These are board specific rules for the Trades and Rumors forum designed to provide organization and a better experience for everyone. Please review these rules before posting new threads. 
        THREAD ETIQUETTE   1. Please search for an existing thread before posting. This forum can be very fast moving, so it's understandable if redundant threads are inadvertently posted. In such a case, please use the report feature to request removal of redundant threads.    2. Provide a clearly identifiable topic title so that users can readily understand the content. The title should include any and all teams involved, as well as player names or other personnel involved as appropriate.   3. All trades, signings, rumors and other news MUST include a linkable source. Simply posting the name of the source is not enough. Effort should also be made to copy and paste the full article, or at the very least the relevant portion of text from the source to the first post of the thread. Moderators may remove low-quality threads in favour of high-quality threads. 

      Affixed to the front of your title should be a label that identifies the type of transaction that is taking place. For all trades use [TRADE]. For all signings use [SIGNING]. For all waiver-wire transactions use [WAIVERS]. For all rumours use [RUMOUR].
      For articles or news items that don't fit into the above categories, affix an appropriate label of your choice such as [NEWS], [ARTICLE] or [MISC].   4. When the status of a thread changes a new thread can be created. The new thread should reflect the change and help focus the discussion on current events. e.g. Someone may create a new thread when a rumor becomes a trades. The old thread will be locked by the moderating team.    5. Do not misrepresent the contents of your thread or post false trades or rumors. Trolling will result in a permanent suspension. 

      SOURCES   The following source types are considered INVALID. Any links to posts or threads on other message boards Any links to personal blogs Any news heard on the radio that does not have a link to an audio vault or podcast Any news seen on television that does not have a link to online video Any news spread by word of mouth
      Additionally, certain sources may be be blacklisted due to poor credentials, clear traffic-mongering etc. Blacklisted sources will be posted here. 
      Thank you for your co-operation and please PM the Administrator or Moderators if you have any questions, concerns or suggestions regarding this forum.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

hockeyville88

[Report] Canucks working on new deal for Burrows

256 posts in this topic

Burrows' goal in game 7 OT vs Chicago was the most important and "clutch" goal scored by a Canuck since Bure's OT goal vs the Flames during the 94 Run.

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Burrows' goal in game 7 OT vs Chicago was the most important and "clutch" goal scored by a Canuck since Bure's OT goal vs the Flames during the 94 Run.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

4 million is more then fair . The guy took a pay-cut last time. Guy deserves a raise this time around. Heart of gold

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

5 years 20 million give er take.. yes his stats might be a bit inflated.. but on the other hand have you noticed that no matter what line he moves to he makes that line better??

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So that means we have to forget about all the times he hasn't showed up when the team needed his goal scoring the most?

3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

even 5 million a year i would do.. (would not want too) but who are you going to replace burrows with? He is a 2way hard working 1st line defensive 30g man who can move up and down the line up and is really well liked.. u r not finding a better replacement for under 5.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So that means we have to forget about all the times he hasn't showed up when the team needed his goal scoring the most?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So that means we have to forget about all the times he hasn't showed up when the team needed his goal scoring the most?

3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not really, the only "clutch" goal i can remember is the goal against Chicago.

He's sucked every other playoffs i can think of.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think most people are near the same page here at a $3.5-4.0 million per year deal for 3-5 year term.

I could live with that.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

3.7 x 5 years

He's one of those players that can play on any line and in any role for the rest of his career.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like burrows but can't help but think the Sedins boosted his play. He should get the salary of a 'good' second liner IMO.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.