• Announcements

    • StealthNuck

      All Threads Must Contain Tags!   07/25/2017

      ALL THREADS MUST CONTAIN TAGS   All threads in this forum must contain tags prefixed to topic titles. The purpose of the tags is to eliminate confusion in recent threads lists, and to create an organized and consistent environment. Moderators may immediately lock and thread that does not contain tags.    Tags must be placed at the start of your thread title, following this exact formatting:    [Tag] Thread Title   Here are some of the most used popular tags:    [Proposal]
      A trade, or trades, for next season, or even the off-season.
      [Off-Season]
      FA signings, off-season trades for RFA's, UFA's rights etc...
      [Value Of]
      (A question regarding a players worth, whether from another team, or the Canucks)
      [Speculation] Posting a rumor (with a source of course), but providing why it could be possible for the Canucks to land that player.   [Discussion]
      Thoughts on team trading strategy and composition.   Please feel free to create your own tag if none of these suit your thread.   

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

TACIC

Is pat Kane gettable?

160 posts in this topic

Could we get Kane? here is my proposal

Van.

Luongo

Raymond

Edler

2013 2nd

Malhotra

Chi.

Kane

Saad

2nd or 1st in 2013

conditional 6th(If Kane gets more than 30 goals it goes to Chicago if not it goes to the Canucks)

and sign Arnott to 1 year 1.2 mil contract

Lineup

D.Sedin,H.Sedin,Burrows/Kane

Booth,Kesler,Burrows/Kane

Higgins,Lapierre,Hansen

Volpatti/Weise,Arnott/Schroeder,Kassian

Would be nice because Kesler works well with Kane/Burrows and the sedins would get a scorer on their line any way and if Kes ain't ready for the season Schroeder or Lappy can move up to second.

Hamuis-Bieksa

Ballard-Garrison

Connauton/Alberts-Tanev

Solid defense and our offense would make up for it.Ballard would be able to rush with Garrison holding the fort

Schneider

Lack

Could sign Ellis too

With this lineup we would not even need doan and Arnott could

move up and down the lineup

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

post thoughts and also what could be edited in it

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

While I don't like your offer, I would love to get Kane.

How about stop complicating it by making it less of a lop-sided swap. Everyone thinks we can just package up all the undesirables and offload them like yesterday's garbage.

Just try something like Edler for Kane. A fair swap to me. Sure it makes the defense worse overall...but just slide Ballard into the top 4 and ride him like a rented mule. If he stays as terrible as he has been, then at least we know for sure that he is no good. There is still an air of mystery around him in my mind.

Trying to guess which prospects or picks to throw in is essentially throwing darts in the dark.

And leave Arnott in the graveyard where he belongs...we have enough marginal centers.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

as much as i like kane

whats with the luongo , ballard raymond and maholtra sht?

cmon bud be realistic

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a problem taking any Hawk and I am sure Luo might have issues picking the wind and cold over pizza and sun.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

While I don't like your offer, I would love to get Kane.

How about stop complicating it by making it less of a lop-sided swap. Everyone thinks we can just package up all the undesirables and offload them like yesterday's garbage.

Just try something like Edler for Kane. A fair swap to me. Sure it makes the defense worse overall...but just slide Ballard into the top 4 and ride him like a rented mule. If he stays as terrible as he has been, then at least we know for sure that he is no good. There is still an air of mystery around him in my mind.

Trying to guess which prospects or picks to throw in is essentially throwing darts in the dark.

And leave Arnott in the graveyard where he belongs...we have enough marginal centers.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How did we trade Edler and still have him in our line up?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

how about this trade:

to Van:

Chicago's entire roster

to Chicago:

Vancouver's entire roster

What, too much involved?

Seriously tho, when do you ever see a trade involving a million pieces? Never.

"Hey let's unload our dirty laundry for their best player!" :picard:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Chicago isn't looking to trade Kane and they are certainly not looking to trade Saad.

Saad is the next golden boy in Chicago and Bowman has him penciled into the top 6 already. The have been marketing the heck out of Saad, he even announced out first round pick at this year's draft. Chicago would never do that deal, Kane is the best player (now) in that deal and Saad could be the best player in the long term.

I'll give you credit though, it's not a bad deal you put together (it's better than most Chicago/Vancouver deals I've seen). The one piece you missed was a goalie gone back to Vancouver, we'd have to shed some more salary so Crawford would need to go to Vancouver.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

how about this trade:

to Van:

Chicago's entire roster

to Chicago:

Vancouver's entire roster

What, too much involved?

Seriously tho, when do you ever see a trade involving a million pieces? Never.

"Hey let's unload our dirty laundry for their best player!" :picard:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Chicago isn't looking to trade Kane and they are certainly not looking to trade Saad.

Saad is the next golden boy in Chicago and Bowman has him penciled into the top 6 already. The have been marketing the heck out of Saad, he even announced out first round pick at this year's draft. Chicago would never do that deal, Kane is the best player (now) in that deal and Saad could be the best player in the long term.

I'll give you credit though, it's not a bad deal you put together. The one piece you missed was a goalie gone back to Vancouver, we'd have to shed some more salary so Crawford would need to go to Vancouver.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd have an issue with a guy like Patrick Kane on our team. He's a very talented player but you gotta remember that there are very good reasons why the Hawks might be trying to unload him.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think this is something every fan base does. I can't count the number of Frolik and Olesz for <insert all star's name> I've seen.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The only player on Chicago that's worthy of drawing Edler out of Van would be Jonathan Toews. Anybody else, no thank you.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think you need to include Manny in that deal.. other than that im okay with it..

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think you need to include Manny in that deal.. other than that im okay with it..

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like it!

EVERYBODY NEEDS TO STOP UNDER-RATING lUONGO RAYMOND MALHOLTRA AND BALLARD!

thats a lot to give up but we're getting a good return. It's a good solid trade 4 both sides!

Thx

Pcuzz B)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.