Darth Kane Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 So how do you think I should turn it into? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TACIC Posted August 17, 2012 Author Share Posted August 17, 2012 I like it! EVERYBODY NEEDS TO STOP UNDER-RATING lUONGO RAYMOND MALHOLTRA AND BALLARD! thats a lot to give up but we're getting a good return. It's a good solid trade 4 both sides! Thx Pcuzz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TACIC Posted August 17, 2012 Author Share Posted August 17, 2012 Honestly I don't know, I don't think there's a realistic deal that an happen between Chicago and Vancouver or Luongo. I love Lou and wouldn't mind him in Chicago but Gillis will want a lot in return and more than a lot from Chicago. Forget the Bolland for Lou rumours, they weren't true and I'd never do that deal. I just don't think Bowman will give Gillis what he wants, the Hawks aren't that desperate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fall0ff Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 how can you put malholtra in 4th line when it's part of your proposal? and our 4th line looks like a bunch of sissy when you put schroder as the anchor man. he is undersize already and is a skill guy, why does he get the 4th line job? stupid, just pure stupidity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Kane Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 I like it! EVERYBODY NEEDS TO STOP UNDER-RATING lUONGO RAYMOND MALHOLTRA AND BALLARD! thats a lot to give up but we're getting a good return. It's a good solid trade 4 both sides! Thx Pcuzz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TACIC Posted August 17, 2012 Author Share Posted August 17, 2012 how can you put malholtra in 4th line when it's part of your proposal? and our 4th line looks like a bunch of sissy when you put schroder as the anchor man. he is undersize already and is a skill guy, why does he get the 4th line job? stupid, just pure stupidity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Kane Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 Added a conditional 6th Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TACIC Posted August 17, 2012 Author Share Posted August 17, 2012 Olesz, Crawford and a Conditional 6th for Luongo? BTW....what's the condition on the pick? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avicii Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 Kane setting up Kesler would be a dream come true. Edler and Schneider for Kane I'd do it in a heartbeat. Overpaying kind of, but you're getting the best playmaking/sniper RW in hockey right now IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Underachieving Hero of CDC Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 Nobody wants Ballard, not even your coach. His cap hit is terrible for his performance and there's not a GM out there that would ask for Ballard in a trade. Raymond has potential, but his performance has dropped and the injury may scare GMs off, same for Manny. Gillis is in a pickle with Luongo, every other GM knows Luongo has to be dealt so rush to make a move? Also, if there is a reduction in the cap without a salary rollback (or a small one) then Gillis will be happy just to lose Luongo's salary. For Lou's situation you can't look at it from just a hockey perspect, the business/cap aspect is much more prevalent. Realistically, look to the Campbell/Olesz trade for what you'll get for Lou and certainly don't expect to get get anything close to what Columbus got for Nash. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TACIC Posted August 17, 2012 Author Share Posted August 17, 2012 Kane setting up Kesler would be a dream come true. Edler and Schneider for Kane I'd do it in a heartbeat. Overpaying kind of, but you're getting the best playmaking/sniper RW in hockey right now IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Kane Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 If Kane scores less than 30 it goes to Canucks and if he does it goes to Chicago Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TACIC Posted August 18, 2012 Author Share Posted August 18, 2012 Sorry, put I'm going to have to pass on any trade where Kane and Luongo are the centre pieces. If you're ready to get serious then you can include Kesler in any trade discussion for Kane. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Kane Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 Just a question.Would you rather do your deal or mine? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Kane Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 Kesler,Malhotra and Ballard and a 4th rounder for Kane and Bolland Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TACIC Posted August 18, 2012 Author Share Posted August 18, 2012 Not that I would do it, but I'd rather do Edler and Schneider for Kane than your proposed deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TACIC Posted August 18, 2012 Author Share Posted August 18, 2012 No. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RonMexico Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 Gotta like the meaningless late round draft pick inclusions in these offers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
73 Percent Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 How did we trade Edler and still have him in our line up? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Kane Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 what else then Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.