Pears Posted August 21, 2012 Share Posted August 21, 2012 I should have know better that to say something about Hodgson. ���� To be honest I don't know yet, I haven't given the exact trade details much thought. Maybe if Hodgson was added to a Luongo deal it could work (not saying it would, I'm just thinking out loud here). I'm a big fan of Hodgson, he still has some growing to do but I like what he's done so far. Is there anything you'd want specifically (and realistically)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Kane Posted August 21, 2012 Share Posted August 21, 2012 Just 2 guys who both think they are a better armchair GM move along lol I think Kassian will turn into a good power forward, cheaper than getting a lucic or Morrow or iginla. Probably would of did Hodgson for Saad+ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TACIC Posted August 21, 2012 Share Posted August 21, 2012 I should have know better that to say something about Hodgson. ���� To be honest I don't know yet, I haven't given the exact trade details much thought. Maybe if Hodgson was added to a Luongo deal it could work (not saying it would, I'm just thinking out loud here). I'm a big fan of Hodgson, he still has some growing to do but I like what he's done so far. Is there anything you'd want specifically (and realistically)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Kane Posted August 21, 2012 Share Posted August 21, 2012 If you guys had good depth on D would Hodgson for Leddy straight up be fair? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TACIC Posted August 21, 2012 Share Posted August 21, 2012 I would agree to that deal. I'd do that deal right now if I could, it would be a win for both sides. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Kane Posted August 21, 2012 Share Posted August 21, 2012 it would be good,Maybe a package like that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mayray2112 Posted August 21, 2012 Share Posted August 21, 2012 I'll admit that I don't know much about Kassian, but it wasn't impressive since arriving in Vancouver. Granted, he's still really young and we don't know what he'll develop into. I just think that Gillis could have got more for Hodgson, instead of waiting he took the only offer he received at the trade deadline. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TACIC Posted August 21, 2012 Share Posted August 21, 2012 No need to make it complicated, Leddy for Hodgson straight up works for everyone. Sometimes the most simple deals are the best ones. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mayray2112 Posted August 21, 2012 Share Posted August 21, 2012 I would agree to that deal. I'd do that deal right now if I could, it would be a win for both sides. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Kane Posted August 21, 2012 Share Posted August 21, 2012 We don't really need leddy. Need more offense Edler-Garrison Hamhuis-Bieksa Ballard-Tanev And we have Connauton*(sp) who is playing well in the AHL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TACIC Posted August 21, 2012 Share Posted August 21, 2012 We don't really need leddy. Need more offense Edler-Garrison Hamhuis-Bieksa Ballard-Tanev And we have Connauton*(sp) who is playing well in the AHL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TACIC Posted August 21, 2012 Share Posted August 21, 2012 You may not need Leddy now, but you did at the trade deadline before Gillis signed Garrison. BTW, the Garrison signing was a great one. Great amount, excellent term and he's a quality defenseman. Some people worry because he's a lat bloomer, but the guy is a hard worker and he's the real deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted August 21, 2012 Share Posted August 21, 2012 You may not need Leddy now, but you did at the trade deadline before Gillis signed Garrison. BTW, the Garrison signing was a great one. Great amount, excellent term and he's a quality defenseman. Some people worry because he's a lat bloomer, but the guy is a hard worker and he's the real deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mayray2112 Posted August 21, 2012 Share Posted August 21, 2012 You may not need Leddy now, but you did at the trade deadline before Gillis signed Garrison. BTW, the Garrison signing was a great one. Great amount, excellent term and he's a quality defenseman. Some people worry because he's a lat bloomer, but the guy is a hard worker and he's the real deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mayray2112 Posted August 21, 2012 Share Posted August 21, 2012 he has a good offense and defense and would rather have him than ballard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TACIC Posted August 21, 2012 Share Posted August 21, 2012 Ballard-Tanev have chemistry. AV will never have 2 young guys Leddy-Tanev as a bottom pairing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TACIC Posted August 21, 2012 Share Posted August 21, 2012 After we got Garrison, I was pipe dreaming about getting Matt Carle too Edler - Garrison Hamhuis - Bieksa Tanev - Carle One can dream right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.