Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Pasific Coluseum

Which Tandem Would You Rather Have: RNH & Webber or The Sedins?

79 posts in this topic

While I'm convinced the Sedins are the best 1,2 punch the Canucks have have had since Bure & Mogilny I think it's time we 'explore' our options.

In a hypothetical situation where all the stars aligned and we could acquire both Ryan Nugent Hopkins and Shea Webber for both Daniel & Henrik, do you pull the trigger? I say yes!

Imagine having 2 more home town BC boys alongside Hamuis & Garrison. RNH is obviously the real deal and easily has the potential to be better than Joe Sakic (another local boy who the Canucks failed to acquire) Shea Webber is the best Defenseman in the NHL and is second to Sidney Crosby as the 2nd best NHL player IN THE WHOLE WIDE WORLD!!!

So I ask you this Canucks fans,

Would you rather have RNH & Shea Webber or The Sedins?

I think its a no brainer!

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Shea Webber is terrible. If he even exists.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Obvious answer is obvious. The Nuge & Weber.

EDIT: Lol at Weber being the second best player in the world though. Not true mang. best Dman in the world yes, but not the second best player in the world.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Would you rather have RNH & Shea Webber or The Sedins?

I think its a no brainer!

3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We need the Sedins more than anyone right now. And I could care less where a player is from anyway.

Also, Weber is NOT the 2nd best player in the NHL.

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Stupid thread and...

a question only a troll would ask, pass the puck off!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We want to win the Cup now and all that matters. We don't want to build a team into an Oilers type team. This is our best chance and probably the best line-up we have had in years.

The Sedins for sure.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Before you say that a player is the second best in THE WHOLE WORLD, spell their name right. WEBER. One 'B', not two. Not to mention that as good as he is, he isn't the second best player in the world behind crosby. Second best D-man maybe, but not player in general.

RNH was rushed into the league b/c Edmonton sucks. He's got it skill wise but he's too small as he is now, and he's already gotten injured b/c of it.

So no, I wouldn't trade the current Sedins for the current RNH and Weber. I would trade the Sedins in two or three years for Weber and RNH but that'll never happen. The Sedins stock will be too low by then, RNH's entry level contract will be ending and he'll be demanding big bucks and he might not even want to play here, plus Weber already has that terrible life time contract. Weber now and in the near future is great. Weber when he's 40? Maybe not.

3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I go with the bird in the hand then 2 in the bush.

Sedins

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Uh, Weber and RNH aren't even on the same team. How would we trade for them? If the Sedins get traded (which won't be until late in their careers, if ever), pretty sure they will be going to the same team.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.