Jump to content

Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Photo

[proposal] Carey Price to Vancouver. (for Lack + Jensen + 2nd)


  • Please log in to reply
86 replies to this topic

#31 hudson bay rules

hudson bay rules

    Canucks Second-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,386 posts
  • Joined: 03-November 10

Posted 05 September 2012 - 11:37 PM

Lou for Price straight up
  • 1
I love rock and roll, just put another dime in the juice box baby.

#32 Schnieds

Schnieds

    Comets Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 171 posts
  • Joined: 23-July 12

Posted 05 September 2012 - 11:42 PM

Lou for Price straight up


Why would Montreal want a goalie who's not as good as Price and is 8 years older? If Luo can't handle the media pressure in Van, he won't last a week in Montreal.
  • 0

#33 uber_pwnzor

uber_pwnzor

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,451 posts
  • Joined: 07-December 11

Posted 06 September 2012 - 12:42 AM

The deal makes no sence, the Canucks do not need another starting goalie. While I understand why you'd want to trade Price, I don't understand why you'd pick the Canucks, out of all the 29 teams, to trade him to.


Edit:
Also, 250Integra says that Jensen is one of the world's top prospects, so why would you trade him?

Yakupov? Galchenyuk? Tatar? Jensen? Bjugstad? Grigorenko? Murray?



:bigblush

Edited by Grammar Police, 06 September 2012 - 12:47 AM.

  • 0

#34 thad

thad

    Canucks Second-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,183 posts
  • Joined: 09-February 09

Posted 06 September 2012 - 12:44 AM

Switch price to Subban
Switch lack to luongo
Switch Jensen to Raymond
And Vancouver keeps its second and gets montreals second as well

And you got a deal!
  • 0

#35 Rounoush

Rounoush

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,107 posts
  • Joined: 19-October 10

Posted 06 September 2012 - 01:19 AM

Yes, let's trade away our best prospects for yet ANOTHER starting goalie. :picard:
  • 0
Posted Image
Thanks a bunch to khalifawiz501 for the signature.

#36 JensenFan2011

JensenFan2011

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,394 posts
  • Joined: 21-September 10

Posted 06 September 2012 - 03:26 AM

I know it sound weird at first, but let me explain.....

I am a Montreal fan and i am really disappointed in the 6.500 000$ we gave Price.

Since Price is a BC native i think Vancouver could have an interest for him. He is one of the best young goalie in the league.

And the best or all, i wont ask the moon for him, my asking price is Only Lack + Jensen + 2nd. I dont want any of Schneider or Luongo back as i dont like their contract as well. And since Vancouver want to win now and Montreal is going to miss the playoff anyway, asking only for prospect is a nice fit.

According to many of their post in many thread, Vancouver fans are among the one who really know how valuable are franchise goalies. I have also often hear how a proven asset worth more than prospect with no NHL experience. So i give you the opportunity to virtually acquire a proven young franchise goalie for a bargain!!

I know you already have Luongo, Schneider and Lack, but being already set in goal never ever been an obstacle for you to propose Luongo to Florida fans who already have Theodore, resigned Clemmensen and Markstrom.

Think about it....Im getting back Lack in the proposal and Vancouver is expected to trade Luongo anyways, so after the proposal Vancouver will have Price + Schneider and could be set in goal for the next decade. Having 2 elites goalies always been one of the main reason Vancouver was successful in the past few year, so lets continue the successful formula.


So any of you would accept my proposal? Any counter offer? (Also, Lets imagine for the sake of the argument that you wont be able to Trade Price back for more than you gave me, because you gave me the best offer around the league..do you still do it ?)


Jensen would not be part of the Deal... AV and MG are too high on him... they don't need a 3rd all star goaltender and certaintly woudln't be willing to give up their top 2 prospects (Lack,Jensen) as our prospect depth sucks balls right now anyways
  • 0

#37 hudson bay rules

hudson bay rules

    Canucks Second-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,386 posts
  • Joined: 03-November 10

Posted 06 September 2012 - 04:13 AM

Jensen would not be part of the Deal... AV and MG are too high on him... they don't need a 3rd all star goaltender and certaintly woudln't be willing to give up their top 2 prospects (Lack,Jensen) as our prospect depth sucks balls right now anyways


AV is high on a rookie?

this I've got to see.
  • 0
I love rock and roll, just put another dime in the juice box baby.

#38 Canuck Surfer

Canuck Surfer

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,707 posts
  • Joined: 27-December 10

Posted 06 September 2012 - 04:18 AM

Troll alert

La hick, troll, la hick, troll, la troll la lowwwww...

Try burpless cucumbers... Great nutrition for a hangover B) :shock: :picard:


I know it sound weird at first, but let me explain.....

I am a Montreal fan and i am really disappointed in the 6.500 000$ we gave Price.

Since Price is a BC native i think Vancouver could have an interest for him. He is one of the best young goalie in the league.

And the best or all, i wont ask the moon for him, my asking price is Only Lack + Jensen + 2nd. I dont want any of Schneider or Luongo back as i dont like their contract as well. And since Vancouver want to win now and Montreal is going to miss the playoff anyway, asking only for prospect is a nice fit.

According to many of their post in many thread, Vancouver fans are among the one who really know how valuable are franchise goalies. I have also often hear how a proven asset worth more than prospect with no NHL experience. So i give you the opportunity to virtually acquire a proven young franchise goalie for a bargain!!

I know you already have Luongo, Schneider and Lack, but being already set in goal never ever been an obstacle for you to propose Luongo to Florida fans who already have Theodore, resigned Clemmensen and Markstrom.

Think about it....Im getting back Lack in the proposal and Vancouver is expected to trade Luongo anyways, so after the proposal Vancouver will have Price + Schneider and could be set in goal for the next decade. Having 2 elites goalies always been one of the main reason Vancouver was successful in the past few year, so lets continue the successful formula.


So any of you would accept my proposal? Any counter offer? (Also, Lets imagine for the sake of the argument that you wont be able to Trade Price back for more than you gave me, because you gave me the best offer around the league..do you still do it ?)


Edited by Canuck Surfer, 06 September 2012 - 04:31 AM.

  • 0

#39 Canuck Surfer

Canuck Surfer

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,707 posts
  • Joined: 27-December 10

Posted 06 September 2012 - 04:21 AM

I've proposed this before; one of the most interesting trades to be dreamed up... :)

Habs fans would kack themselves over loosing Price until they learned they scored Lou... Then I wonder how they would feel? ( Honest Question? )


Lou for Price straight up


Edited by Canuck Surfer, 06 September 2012 - 04:37 AM.

  • 0

#40 palindrom

palindrom

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,072 posts
  • Joined: 09-December 10

Posted 06 September 2012 - 06:47 AM

Jensen would not be part of the Deal... AV and MG are too high on him... they don't need a 3rd all star goaltender and certaintly woudln't be willing to give up their top 2 prospects (Lack,Jensen) as our prospect depth sucks balls right now anyways


No problem, what about Kassian, Lack and a 2nd for Price?

Vancouver is in a win now mode, that why i am asking only prospect for a proven franchise goalie.

Edited by palindrom, 06 September 2012 - 06:51 AM.

  • 0
Posted Image Was too much for me!

Instead im reading English grammar for advanced dummies





#41 Pears

Pears

    Canucks All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,071 posts
  • Joined: 14-November 11

Posted 06 September 2012 - 07:56 AM

:picard: This makes no sense for either team. Unless the Habs want MacKinnon they'd laugh at MG each time he calls Montreal. With this you're essentially handing Vancouver the Cup as MG could trade Luongo for something great and Price for something incredible.

Edited by Steven Stamkos' Mullet, 06 September 2012 - 08:16 AM.

  • 1

In my eyes drouin is overrated he can score in the qmjhl but did nothing in last two gold medal games that canada lost. Fox will be better pro than him talk to me in five yrs

Gaudreau has one NHL goal whereas all your "prized" prospects have none.

   ryan kesler is going to the chicago blackhawks ...       quote me on it


#42 mpt

mpt

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,449 posts
  • Joined: 08-November 03

Posted 06 September 2012 - 09:25 AM

Lets not care about that, let say according to your judgement that i am a bad GM and i give the opportunity to Vancouver to acquire Price for Jensen, lack and a 2nd (but you wotn be able to trade Price back for more, because we assume its the best offer i could find around the league for him.)

Do you accept the trade or not?


What a stupid question...
  • 1

#43 mpt

mpt

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,449 posts
  • Joined: 08-November 03

Posted 06 September 2012 - 09:27 AM

Sounds like this guy is in a fantasy league or something and needing advice on a trade do he comes here. Sure take the deal and trade Price it's a great deal for you :P
  • 0

#44 elvis15

elvis15

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 20,597 posts
  • Joined: 27-February 07

Posted 06 September 2012 - 09:46 AM

Apart from the obvious trolling by the OP, even if he is genuinely interested in what it'd take to get Price, why would one of the worst teams in the NHL last year trade it's starting goalie for two prospects and a pick? By the (again, trolling) logic about Price being a BC boy why wouldn't Luongo be going back in an even swap? He's from Montreal, just like Price is from BC. Then, why do we need another starter who's more expensive than either of our current ones?

There is so much wrong with this thread.
  • 1

c3c9e9.pnganimalhousesig.jpg

Tanev is going to EDM. I can put my life savings down on it

 


#45 qwijibo

qwijibo

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,143 posts
  • Joined: 10-January 09

Posted 06 September 2012 - 12:14 PM

I don't actually believe the op is a Montreal fan. Every proposal I've seen involving Montreal he always comments. "I'd rather give them Price"
  • 0

#46 Pineapples

Pineapples

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,722 posts
  • Joined: 15-June 10

Posted 06 September 2012 - 12:43 PM

:shock:

Sorry man but.

Luongo & Schneider < Price & Schneider


On a team that spends to the max, I'd take Lu at 5.3 over Price at 6.5
  • 0

Pineapple_jumps.gifPineapple_jumps.gif

 


#47 Jägermeister

Jägermeister

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,600 posts
  • Joined: 24-May 12

Posted 06 September 2012 - 01:01 PM

This is terrible.
  • 0
Posted Image

#48 JensenFan2011

JensenFan2011

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,394 posts
  • Joined: 21-September 10

Posted 06 September 2012 - 02:38 PM

AV is high on a rookie?

this I've got to see.


i know its weird but he spoke very highly about Jensen
  • 0

#49 JensenFan2011

JensenFan2011

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,394 posts
  • Joined: 21-September 10

Posted 06 September 2012 - 02:38 PM

No problem, what about Kassian, Lack and a 2nd for Price?

Vancouver is in a win now mode, that why i am asking only prospect for a proven franchise goalie.


No because MG would then look like and idiot for trading Hodgson for Kassian
  • 0

#50 Smashian Kassian

Smashian Kassian

    Canucks Franchise Player

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,166 posts
  • Joined: 10-June 10

Posted 06 September 2012 - 03:53 PM

Clearly an Luongo hater


Haha

Nah Luongo lover & Realist
  • 1

zackass.png


#51 Smashian Kassian

Smashian Kassian

    Canucks Franchise Player

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,166 posts
  • Joined: 10-June 10

Posted 06 September 2012 - 03:58 PM

On a team that spends to the max, I'd take Lu at 5.3 over Price at 6.5


Idk I guess but Price I think is better than Luongo, they are close skillwise but Price is young and I personally think he is probably a bit better than Luongo right now.

I would take him over Luongo or Schneider myself if I could have one of the 3.
  • 1

zackass.png


#52 vv2

vv2

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,398 posts
  • Joined: 11-November 08

Posted 06 September 2012 - 07:59 PM

Idk I guess but Price I think is better than Luongo, they are close skillwise but Price is young and I personally think he is probably a bit better than Luongo right now.

I would take him over Luongo or Schneider myself if I could have one of the 3.

Luongo>Price>Schnieder
  • 0
Posted Image
Credit to -Vintage Canuck-

#53 Smashian Kassian

Smashian Kassian

    Canucks Franchise Player

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,166 posts
  • Joined: 10-June 10

Posted 06 September 2012 - 08:01 PM

Luongo>Price>Schnieder


Did you say that we should trade Luongo for Lecavalier before?

And now your his biggest fan?
  • 0

zackass.png


#54 Avicii

Avicii

    Canucks All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,363 posts
  • Joined: 02-July 07

Posted 06 September 2012 - 08:08 PM

Did you say that we should trade Luongo for Lecavalier before?

And now your his biggest fan?


I have 6 Edler jerseys.

I would trade him for Weber in a second.

EDLER HATER
  • 0

Posted Image


#55 -Vintage Canuck-

-Vintage Canuck-

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 69,210 posts
  • Joined: 24-May 10

Posted 06 September 2012 - 08:22 PM

Doesn't make sense at all.
  • 0

307mg00.jpg


#56 Smashian Kassian

Smashian Kassian

    Canucks Franchise Player

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,166 posts
  • Joined: 10-June 10

Posted 06 September 2012 - 08:42 PM

I have 6 Edler jerseys.

I would trade him for Weber in a second.

EDLER HATER


There is a huge difference in Luongo/Lecavalier and Weber/Edler.

Weber > Edler

Luongo > Lecavalier


Not a good comparison.

A better comparison would be saying "I have 6 Edler jersey's" then saying we should trade him for someone like James Wisniewski, Brian Campbell or Alex Goligoski.

Edited by Smashian Kassian, 06 September 2012 - 08:42 PM.

  • 1

zackass.png


#57 Avicii

Avicii

    Canucks All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,363 posts
  • Joined: 02-July 07

Posted 06 September 2012 - 08:43 PM

There is a huge difference in Luongo/Lecavalier and Weber/Edler.

Weber > Edler

Luongo > Lecavalier


Not a good comparison.

A better comparison would be saying "I have 6 Edler jersey's" then saying we should trade him for someone like James Wisniewski, Brian Campbell or Alex Goligoski.


Uh, do you would rather have Luongo sitting on the bench than a legitimate, cup winning 2nd line center in Lecavalier.

Okay makes sense.

Luongo for Lecavalier would be an absolute steal for us.
  • 0

Posted Image


#58 Smashian Kassian

Smashian Kassian

    Canucks Franchise Player

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,166 posts
  • Joined: 10-June 10

Posted 06 September 2012 - 08:53 PM

Uh, do you would rather have Luongo sitting on the bench than a legitimate, cup winning 2nd line center in Lecavalier.

Okay makes sense.

Luongo for Lecavalier would be an absolute steal for us.


Yeah it doesnt make alot of sense to have a star goalie like Luongo who can step in at any time and play amazingly to sit on the bench, ill give you that but there are tons of other players I would rather than a player who is past his prime, and is really just an average player and one who has a rediculous 7+ million dollar contract that I want no part of now that he isn't the player he once was.

I would love to get a great 2nd liner but just not Lecavalier.

Edited by Smashian Kassian, 06 September 2012 - 08:54 PM.

  • 0

zackass.png


#59 Pears

Pears

    Canucks All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,071 posts
  • Joined: 14-November 11

Posted 06 September 2012 - 08:56 PM

Uh, do you would rather have Luongo sitting on the bench than a legitimate, cup winning 2nd line center in Lecavalier.

Okay makes sense.

Luongo for Lecavalier would be an absolute steal for Tampa.

Fixed.
  • 0

In my eyes drouin is overrated he can score in the qmjhl but did nothing in last two gold medal games that canada lost. Fox will be better pro than him talk to me in five yrs

Gaudreau has one NHL goal whereas all your "prized" prospects have none.

   ryan kesler is going to the chicago blackhawks ...       quote me on it


#60 Avicii

Avicii

    Canucks All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,363 posts
  • Joined: 02-July 07

Posted 06 September 2012 - 09:24 PM

Steal for Tampa?

Obviously his point totals are going to decrease.. He plays behind Steven Fricken Stamkos.

You guys probably don't watch many Lightning games
  • 0

Posted Image





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.