Jump to content

Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Photo
- - - - -

NHL 13 - CDC Sim Connected [PS3 SIM LEAGUE] pt 2[Taking Applications]


  • Please log in to reply
2942 replies to this topic

Poll: Manual Waivers? (28 member(s) have cast votes)

Manual Waiver Situation. First come first serve or 24 hour claiming?

  1. First come first serve (9 votes [32.14%])

    Percentage of vote: 32.14%

  2. Wait 24 hours and do a random draw (19 votes [67.86%])

    Percentage of vote: 67.86%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1561 mrsasaki

mrsasaki

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,757 posts
  • Joined: 19-May 12

Posted 05 October 2012 - 06:58 AM

Woo! Got Jagr and Hunwick. Missed out of Weiss though :/
  • 0
CDC Sim Connected: Nashville GM
LOB (PS3): Boston GM

#1562 coleman26

coleman26

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,520 posts
  • Joined: 09-August 12

Posted 05 October 2012 - 08:12 AM

Unless any of you matched 8 figures, he's mine ;)


LOL
  • 0

#1563 Tangelos

Tangelos

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,267 posts
  • Joined: 16-April 12

Posted 05 October 2012 - 08:22 AM

The panthers are pleased to welcome Michal Rozsival, Michael Ryder and Brendan Morrow to the team.

Also who did Teravainen sign with?

Oh and btw, I will be gone to the states until Sunday. Will not have access to my ps3 until then.
  • 0
Posted Image

Previously:
6OH!4, Doug The Thug Glatt

#1564 Tangelos

Tangelos

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,267 posts
  • Joined: 16-April 12

Posted 05 October 2012 - 08:27 AM

My predicted starting lineup;

Huberdeau-Sutter-Skinner
Morrow-Matthias-Ryder
Bergenheim-Schenn-Downie
Gomez-Fiddler-Smithson

Kulikov-Johnson
Leddy-Rozsival
Jovanovski-Montador
Morrissonn
Methot

Markstrom
Theodore
  • 0
Posted Image

Previously:
6OH!4, Doug The Thug Glatt

#1565 Durl Dixsun

Durl Dixsun

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,243 posts
  • Joined: 02-November 10

Posted 05 October 2012 - 08:59 AM

OTB:
Nikita Filatov (23 years old, 77 overall, 4 gold stars)

Need a NHL ready top 4 LD in return!
  • 0

Posted Image


#1566 mpt

mpt

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,192 posts
  • Joined: 08-November 03

Posted 05 October 2012 - 09:13 AM

The Washington Capitals would like to officially welcome Teemu Selanne to our organization. We are very happy he decided to join the Capitals. His veteran leadership and experience will be invaluable to our dressing room moving forward.
  • 0

#1567 mpt

mpt

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,192 posts
  • Joined: 08-November 03

Posted 05 October 2012 - 09:23 AM

For those of you wondering, Victor Rask went to EDM on a 1 year deal.


Called it.... LOL

Edited by mpt, 05 October 2012 - 09:24 AM.

  • 0

#1568 Tangelos

Tangelos

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,267 posts
  • Joined: 16-April 12

Posted 05 October 2012 - 09:29 AM

Called it.... LOL


He gave him 9 million :picard:
  • 0
Posted Image

Previously:
6OH!4, Doug The Thug Glatt

#1569 coleman26

coleman26

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,520 posts
  • Joined: 09-August 12

Posted 05 October 2012 - 09:30 AM

Over one year? Were you just going to bury him off? Because that's really unfair and not something we should be allowing at all.
  • 0

#1570 coleman26

coleman26

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,520 posts
  • Joined: 09-August 12

Posted 05 October 2012 - 09:40 AM

Well, I hope Edmonton knows he's staying in the NHL at 9m or he's passing through waivers. Because that is bull.
  • 0

#1571 coleman26

coleman26

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,520 posts
  • Joined: 09-August 12

Posted 05 October 2012 - 09:46 AM

Apparently I'm wrong. Feel free to ruin the league. ???? ridiculous.
  • 0

#1572 Tangelos

Tangelos

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,267 posts
  • Joined: 16-April 12

Posted 05 October 2012 - 09:48 AM

Over one year? Were you just going to bury him off? Because that's really unfair and not something we should be allowing at all.


I wouldn't say it's unfair since he does have the cap. But still it is ridiculous. And if we're playing with waivers off it should apply to everyone.
  • 0
Posted Image

Previously:
6OH!4, Doug The Thug Glatt

#1573 coleman26

coleman26

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,520 posts
  • Joined: 09-August 12

Posted 05 October 2012 - 09:55 AM

Well, it comes down to whether he's on the cap. If he's gets to pass thru waivers and we're just accepted a programming fault as canon long-term though, I'm going to have a few things to say about it before it's done.
  • 0

#1574 Tangelos

Tangelos

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,267 posts
  • Joined: 16-April 12

Posted 05 October 2012 - 09:56 AM

We should maybe have a rule that if you give a fa over 2 million or something, he has to play on your team. And anything below that can be placed in the minors.
  • 0
Posted Image

Previously:
6OH!4, Doug The Thug Glatt

#1575 coleman26

coleman26

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,520 posts
  • Joined: 09-August 12

Posted 05 October 2012 - 09:59 AM

There are rookies who make 3+, Neiderreiter is one that comes to mind, but the gist to me is that you can't give a 9m salary to someone on a two-way deal. If you sign someone to a 1 way deal, whether you're exploiting a CBA loophole or not, he's on your team that year.
  • 0

#1576 mpt

mpt

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,192 posts
  • Joined: 08-November 03

Posted 05 October 2012 - 09:59 AM

He should be waiver ineligible due to his age and NHL history.

Here is a proposed rule so this doesn't happen again. If the league funds out you signed someone to a much larger than reality contract and that player doesn't play for your team the duration of the contract you will incur a penalty of losing 2 first round picks going to the winner of the Stanley cup in the year it was done.
  • 0

#1577 Tangelos

Tangelos

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,267 posts
  • Joined: 16-April 12

Posted 05 October 2012 - 10:00 AM

There are rookies who make 3+, Neiderreiter is one that comes to mind, but the gist to me is that you can't give a 9m salary to someone on a two-way deal. If you sign someone to a 1 way deal, whether you're exploiting a CBA loophole or not, he's on your team that year.


Well if the player is on a 2-way contract, then you can do whatever the hell you want. He's making 3+ due to signing bonuses.
  • 0
Posted Image

Previously:
6OH!4, Doug The Thug Glatt

#1578 Tangelos

Tangelos

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,267 posts
  • Joined: 16-April 12

Posted 05 October 2012 - 10:01 AM

He should be waiver ineligible due to his age and NHL history.

Here is a proposed rule so this doesn't happen again. If the league funds out you signed someone to a much larger than reality contract and that player doesn't play for your team the duration of the contract you will incur a penalty of losing 2 first round picks going to the winner of the Stanley cup in the year it was done.


so the 2 first round picks goes to the best team in the league? That makes sense.... *sarcasm*
  • 0
Posted Image

Previously:
6OH!4, Doug The Thug Glatt

#1579 mpt

mpt

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,192 posts
  • Joined: 08-November 03

Posted 05 October 2012 - 10:02 AM

The Oilers have zero capspace left so they can't sign anyone else as all one way deals are counted towards the cap. Where the problem is going to lie is who is signed after we can send people to the minors at the starI of the season.
  • 0

#1580 coleman26

coleman26

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,520 posts
  • Joined: 09-August 12

Posted 05 October 2012 - 10:03 AM

Except this. Best lines. He'll get put thru waivers at the first sign of an injury, unless he's one of the 12 best players on that team. So, I propose rather that Edmonton be forced to develop Rask and put him back onto the open market next year, under threat of being fired.

Edited by coleman26, 05 October 2012 - 10:03 AM.

  • 0

#1581 mpt

mpt

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,192 posts
  • Joined: 08-November 03

Posted 05 October 2012 - 10:03 AM

so the 2 first round picks goes to the best team in the league? That makes sense.... *sarcasm*


Fine how about a random draw to any two teams in the league? I'm just shooting out ideas.
  • 0

#1582 coleman26

coleman26

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,520 posts
  • Joined: 09-August 12

Posted 05 October 2012 - 10:05 AM

I'd rather we just put Rask back on the market in 2014, and serve notice to the entire league that this doesn't happen again. There is no way of keeping Rask in the NHL unless we sim 3 day cycles and Edmonton forcibly brings him up every cycle
  • 0

#1583 mpt

mpt

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,192 posts
  • Joined: 08-November 03

Posted 05 October 2012 - 10:06 AM

That won't matter because regardless the Oilers have the capspace. They didn't circumvent anything. If they go out and use that 9 million again in the season to sign better players or make trades now that is cheating and needs to be punished.

Edited by mpt, 05 October 2012 - 10:06 AM.

  • 0

#1584 mpt

mpt

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,192 posts
  • Joined: 08-November 03

Posted 05 October 2012 - 10:08 AM

One way deals don't mean they have to stay in the NHL it means they get paid their salary regardless of where they play. We just can't allow Edmonton to sign anyone else or make a trade to take on more salary.

If they have the capspace they aren't doing anything wrong. If they trick the ps3 into dumping some capspace then use that capspace to acquire more players, they are cheating and need to be punished accordingly.

Edited by mpt, 05 October 2012 - 10:11 AM.

  • 0

#1585 Tangelos

Tangelos

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,267 posts
  • Joined: 16-April 12

Posted 05 October 2012 - 10:09 AM

One way deals don't mean they have to stay in the NHL it means they get paid their salary regardless of where they play. We just can't allow Edmonton to sign anyone else or make a trade to take on more salary.


unless he sends a 2-way contract to the minors.
  • 0
Posted Image

Previously:
6OH!4, Doug The Thug Glatt

#1586 coleman26

coleman26

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,520 posts
  • Joined: 09-August 12

Posted 05 October 2012 - 10:11 AM

They get paid their salary, yeah, but, buried salary doesn't count on the Cap, which is why Dallas got to have Ballard in the AHL all year and was 4m over cap space as soon as the playoffs were done. Right now, Edmonton can't sign anyone, and we can impose a trading and signing block on them all year, but once the season starts, they'll have open cap space. see Redden, Commodore, Souray.

But you are right, they should be limited from making moves by us to reflect the fact that they have no cap. I would suggest the imposition of a trading and signing freeze in addition to Rask hitting the market again in 2014.

Edited by coleman26, 05 October 2012 - 10:12 AM.

  • 0

#1587 mpt

mpt

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,192 posts
  • Joined: 08-November 03

Posted 05 October 2012 - 10:14 AM

They can make trades as long as their cap remains identical or goes down but they can't sign anyone else.

So far they haven't broken any rules so as far as I'm concerned Rask is Edmonton's property. If they break the rules there will be punishment. That hasn't happened as of yet.

Edited by mpt, 05 October 2012 - 10:16 AM.

  • 0

#1588 Tangelos

Tangelos

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,267 posts
  • Joined: 16-April 12

Posted 05 October 2012 - 10:15 AM

well the teams who have Redden, Commodore and souray should be penalized as well. But the fact is there are some bad players making lots of money that deserve to be in the minors. Rask is technically a bad player making lots of money just like the players I mentioned above. So maybe he shouldn't be penalized?
  • 0
Posted Image

Previously:
6OH!4, Doug The Thug Glatt

#1589 coleman26

coleman26

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,520 posts
  • Joined: 09-August 12

Posted 05 October 2012 - 10:17 AM

I didn't mean in the game, I meant in the NHL when their teams actually buried their salaries. But there's literally no way of keeping Rask in the NHL, and as such, on the cap this year, and since waivers are off, no one can claim him even if they wanted to. It's more the part where it's completely unrealistic and an exploitation of circumstances that would never exist, like an owner not firing the absolute crap out of you for doing it, to make it happen. It's like the Kovalchuk signing. It got tried, it's definitely not cool, and it shouldn't be allowed to happen again.
  • 0

#1590 mpt

mpt

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,192 posts
  • Joined: 08-November 03

Posted 05 October 2012 - 10:25 AM

They get paid their salary, yeah, but, buried salary doesn't count on the Cap, which is why Dallas got to have Ballard in the AHL all year and was 4m over cap space as soon as the playoffs were done. Right now, Edmonton can't sign anyone, and we can impose a trading and signing block on them all year, but once the season starts, they'll have open cap space. see Redden, Commodore, Souray.

But you are right, they should be limited from making moves by us to reflect the fact that they have no cap. I would suggest the imposition of a trading and signing freeze in addition to Rask hitting the market again in 2014.


That was Philly with Ballard not Dallas and yes that was unacceptable. That is what we need to avoid,
  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.