Kovalsnipe Posted September 17, 2012 Share Posted September 17, 2012 TO NJ: Ballard Raymond 1st Connauton To VAN: Clarkson Volchenkov Raymond + 1st = Clarkson Ballard + Connauton = Volchenkov Thoughts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MashedBananas Posted September 17, 2012 Share Posted September 17, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanucksFanMike Posted September 17, 2012 Share Posted September 17, 2012 I would rather keep Ballard over Volchenkov Connauton is a really underrated defensive prospect who could potentially crack the Canucks roster this year Raymond, 1st >>> Clarkson Overpayment by us But what I will say is well done spelling Connauton right.... most CDCers spell it Connaughton and for whatever reason it really bugs me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted September 17, 2012 Share Posted September 17, 2012 I would rather keep Ballard over Volchenkov Connauton is a really underrated defensive prospect who could potentially crack the Canucks roster this year Raymond, 1st >>> Clarkson Overpayment by us But what I will say is well done spelling Connauton right.... most CDCers spell it Connaughton and for whatever reason it really bugs me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rounoush Posted September 17, 2012 Share Posted September 17, 2012 Gillis would not make this trade and rightfully so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex Burrows 14 Posted September 17, 2012 Share Posted September 17, 2012 I would rather keep Ballard over Volchenkov Connauton is a really underrated defensive prospect who could potentially crack the Canucks roster this year Raymond, 1st >>> Clarkson Overpayment by us But what I will say is well done spelling Connauton right.... most CDCers spell it Connaughton and for whatever reason it really bugs me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Mind Posted September 17, 2012 Share Posted September 17, 2012 Maybe add a D prospect from NJ to make up for lost depth, then MG might do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mack Attack Posted September 17, 2012 Share Posted September 17, 2012 You're not serious, are you? Anyone with common sense would take Volchenkov over Ballard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted September 17, 2012 Share Posted September 17, 2012 Volchenkov's awful, and has an even worse contract. Why trade one overpaid dman for another? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kanucks1 Posted September 17, 2012 Share Posted September 17, 2012 Because Volchenkov is twice the top 4 D man Ballard is. Volchenkov also has a nasty side to him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Bissonnette Posted September 17, 2012 Share Posted September 17, 2012 Good value, but I doubt the Devils would give up Clarkson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwarrior Posted September 19, 2012 Share Posted September 19, 2012 i really hope gillis dosent even consider this trade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schnieds Posted September 20, 2012 Share Posted September 20, 2012 i really hope gillis dosent even consider this trade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.