Jump to content

Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Photo

(Proposal) Van-Stl


  • Please log in to reply
14 replies to this topic

#1 Alex Burrows 14

Alex Burrows 14

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,394 posts
  • Joined: 03-August 12

Posted 16 September 2012 - 07:58 PM

To Van: Vladmir Sobotka and Ty Rattie
To Stl: Mason Raymond, Jordan Schroeder, 2nd, 2nd

Van gets a versatile winger/center with speed who can hit and a solid propsect.

St.Louis gets a winger to replace sobotka, a propsect to replace rattie and a few picks to make up the difference in value.

Edited by Alex Burrows 14, 17 September 2012 - 07:43 PM.

  • 0
Posted Image

#2 Zoolander

Zoolander

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,189 posts
  • Joined: 29-February 12

Posted 16 September 2012 - 08:17 PM

Sobotka, although a great agitator, still isn't worth much

And Rattie <<<<<<<Than Schroeder and a 1st
If anything Rattie for Schroeder straght up but I'd have trouble even pulling the trigger on that.
  • 0
My 2014 Draft wishlist: 1st rd: Draisaitl, Virtanen, Scherbak. 2nd rd: Brendan Lemieux, Thatcher Demko (Goalie)
Posted Image
Future Canucks top 6:
Shinkaruk-Draisaitl-Scherbak
Virtanen-Horvat-Jensen

#3 CanucksFanMike

CanucksFanMike

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,632 posts
  • Joined: 28-September 11

Posted 16 September 2012 - 08:26 PM

take out the picks and it is more fair.... but even then I wouldn't do it
  • 0
Posted Image
Credit to -Vintage Canuck-

#4 Rounoush

Rounoush

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,130 posts
  • Joined: 19-October 10

Posted 16 September 2012 - 08:43 PM

Nope. Not for me.
  • 0
Posted Image
Thanks a bunch to khalifawiz501 for the signature.

#5 Pineapples

Pineapples

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,903 posts
  • Joined: 15-June 10

Posted 16 September 2012 - 08:53 PM

Massive overpayment by us. Take out the picks if you want it to be more fair. Though I still wouldn't do it, but others might like it.
  • 0

Pineapple_jumps.gifPineapple_jumps.gif

 


#6 elvis15

elvis15

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 20,857 posts
  • Joined: 27-February 07

Posted 16 September 2012 - 08:53 PM

"Hey Blues, here's a bunch of stuff you probably don't need, but is more in quantity than what we want back. Interested?"
  • 2

c3c9e9.pnganimalhousesig.jpg

Tanev is going to EDM. I can put my life savings down on it

 


#7 wallstreetamigo

wallstreetamigo

    Canucks Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,460 posts
  • Joined: 01-April 07

Posted 16 September 2012 - 10:20 PM

That is a huge overpayment by Vancouver.

They should consider trading Ballard to St Louis actually. Ballard would be a guy that St Louis might actually want as they desperately need a natural left side dman to play with Pietrangelo.
  • 0

#8 Prngr44

Prngr44

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,488 posts
  • Joined: 26-March 03

Posted 17 September 2012 - 09:03 AM

That is a huge overpayment by Vancouver.

They should consider trading Ballard to St Louis actually. Ballard would be a guy that St Louis might actually want as they desperately need a natural left side dman to play with Pietrangelo.


True. We also lack a bad contract and that would fill that hole as well.
  • 0
I hate the Canucks so much they're my second favorite team.
Posted Image

#9 kanucks1

kanucks1

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,428 posts
  • Joined: 14-July 12

Posted 17 September 2012 - 03:07 PM

Sobotka, although a great agitator, still isn't worth much

And Rattie <<<<<<<Than Schroeder and a 1st
If anything Rattie for Schroeder straght up but I'd have trouble even pulling the trigger on that.


How???? Rattie has way more potential than Schroeder but we overpay because of the 1st and two seconds. Take out the firrst and it's even.
  • 1
Posted Image


CDC Fantasy League GM Chicago Blackhawks

#10 Alex Burrows 14

Alex Burrows 14

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,394 posts
  • Joined: 03-August 12

Posted 17 September 2012 - 07:44 PM

Sobotka, although a great agitator, still isn't worth much

And Rattie <<<<<<<Than Schroeder and a 1st
If anything Rattie for Schroeder straght up but I'd have trouble even pulling the trigger on that.


rattie is going to be better then schroeder, he is an amazing prospect

take out the picks and it is more fair.... but even then I wouldn't do it


why? sobotka is an upgrade on raymond and rattie is an upgrade on schroeder
  • 0
Posted Image

#11 kanucks1

kanucks1

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,428 posts
  • Joined: 14-July 12

Posted 17 September 2012 - 07:54 PM

rattie is going to be better then schroeder, he is an amazing prospect



why? sobotka is an upgrade on raymond and rattie is an upgrade on schroeder



agreed.
  • 0
Posted Image


CDC Fantasy League GM Chicago Blackhawks

#12 Jägermeister

Jägermeister

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,667 posts
  • Joined: 24-May 12

Posted 17 September 2012 - 08:07 PM

Get rid of one of the 2nds and I'd do it.
Still wouldn't be a bad deal with both though.
  • 0
Posted Image

#13 Raymond Ballard and a 1st

Raymond Ballard and a 1st

    Comets Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 152 posts
  • Joined: 30-August 12

Posted 17 September 2012 - 09:15 PM

take out the picks and it is more fair.... but even then I wouldn't do it

Technically we have to give atleast one 2nd, because we all now Raymond has negative value..
  • 0

#14 gwarrior

gwarrior

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,101 posts
  • Joined: 06-September 11

Posted 19 September 2012 - 10:53 AM

i find it odd how so many people just throw schroeder in to their proposals with out really knowing what we have in him.
  • 0

#15 Alex Burrows 14

Alex Burrows 14

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,394 posts
  • Joined: 03-August 12

Posted 19 September 2012 - 07:21 PM

i find it odd how so many people just throw schroeder in to their proposals with out really knowing what we have in him.


i didnt just throw him in there. i know he could very well become a good player but i think rattie is going to be better






  • 0
Posted Image




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.