Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

Confident Lapierre hope to muscle into Canucks' third line


Live.&.Die.Nucks

Recommended Posts

Lappiere would be a really good 3rd liner, especially if he could cut down on the crap a little and focus on playing hockey 100% of the time (don't get me wrong, I love the guy, but I have no doubts he could still be an even more effective player).

Only issue I have with him being our 3rd liner, is the possibility of an injury to Kesler or Henrik (though he will never ever get injured), and Lappy having to be on the 2nd line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah. I've loved this acquisition. What a troll. You just want to punch that face lol...

To think, Bolduc was once our 4C [shudder]

I wouldn't get my hopes up too much, but it is possible he's got more to bring to the table.

Getting both him and Higgy at deadline was pretty amazingsauce'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On one hand I'm pretty satisfied with Lapierre. He is a great depth player and has hown at times he can move up the line up. I'm speaking more to him playing 3rd line centre in the 2011 play off's against Chicago, Nashville and San Jose than getting some goals with Henrik a few games this year.

But, and its a BIG but...

Imagine if we started without Kesler, and then Hank got injured? :blink:

Would you want to play with a starting lineup of

Danny/Schroeder/Burrows

Higgins/Lapierre/Booth

Raymond/Malhotra/Hansen

Volpatti/Gaunce/Kassian (although this looks a big fast 4th line!)

??? :sadno: Too weak down the middle if an eventual injury finally happens to ironman Hank!

I'm still for signing Arnott; regardless of how pumped I am about Lapierre!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...