Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Tystick

The Truth of the 9/11 Pentagon Attack

106 posts in this topic

The title of that 2nd video...

No, the plane was a figment of everyones imagination :picard:

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think anyone doubts that Bush was Machiavellian enough to pull it off but it doesn't necessarily make it true. I think it was tower 9 in New York which crumbled on it's own with no relation to either World Trade tower. I found that more convincing than what was clearly a projectile of some sort with a definite hit on the side on the Pentagon.

Bush may well be a war criminal but I highly doubt any of this was self inflicted.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would be disgusted if it were fraudulent. And I keep telling myself that people wouldn't do that sort of thing to their own fellow citizens, but in today's world I wouldn't put it past them.

Anyway, I doubt we'll ever know.

4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First video makes sense as at 5:10, you can clearly see a bunker-buster/tomahawk. Anyone who says something that small is a 737 probably tips the wallet inspector as well :picard::lol:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First video makes sense as at 5:10, you can clearly see a bunker-buster/tomahawk. Anyone who says something that small is a 737 probably tips the wallet inspector as well :picard::lol:

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This video is much more informative by an ex-military general, as well as top military and commercial pilots.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice find Heretic! I think people don't understand speed and the physics of impact. This is why people get killed on highways because they underestimate the risks and don't get the concept the faster you go, the longer it takes to stop, and the handling is more touchy. Modern aircraft with its amazing engineering the primary component of the structure is aluminum. So in essence you're sitting in a flying beer can, with fuel and engines in the wings.

Back in 1979 American Airlines Flight 191 had an engine fall off shortly after take off, damaging the wing, and some of the electrical and hydraulic systems. The result is the aircraft stalled and impacted the ground at about 300 km/h. The impact site was clearly seen, but the plane looked like it was vaporized. The Pentagon was lucky, if the aircraft attacked at a high angle and a higher speed there might have been a lot more severe damage.

Here's pictures of Flight 191. You can read about it on Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AA_191

Aa191_ohare_zps30122037.jpg

AA191-crash-site_zpse76fdc8b.png

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice find Heretic! I think people don't understand speed and the physics of impact. This is why people get killed on highways because they underestimate the risks and don't get the concept the faster you go, the longer it takes to stop, and the handling is more touchy. Modern aircraft with its amazing engineering the primary component of the structure is aluminum. So in essence you're sitting in a flying beer can, with fuel and engines in the wings.

Back in 1979 American Airlines Flight 191 had an engine fall off shortly after take off, damaging the wing, and some of the electrical and hydraulic systems. The result is the aircraft stalled and impacted the ground at about 300 km/h. The impact site was clearly seen, but the plane looked like it was vaporized. The Pentagon was lucky, if the aircraft attacked at a high angle and a higher speed there might have been a lot more severe damage.

Here's pictures of Flight 191. You can read about it on Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AA_191

Aa191_ohare_zps30122037.jpg

AA191-crash-site_zpse76fdc8b.png

3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Are we still doing this? Wow.

You conspiracists are giving the US government WAY too much credit. The logistics needed to pull off such a huge conspiracy is basically impossible. No government or agency in the world could pull that off and would be stupid to risk it. Makes 0 sense.

There is no way to be sure how buildings react to jet liners crashing into them. It doesn't happen often and even if it did, every crash will have new factors not being able to take into consideration.

Bottom line is theorists are just filling in the blanks with what they want. We could sit here and do that all day, assuming its fact when it's not. This conspiracy makes 0 sense to attempt and would be impossible to pull off.

The government and the agencies connected to it simply don't have the ability to successfully mount such an operation. As well again it makes absolutely 0 sense. Same government thought there were WMD in Iraq and couldn't even get that intel right. And you think they could pull this off?

Keep dreaming.

4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.