Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

The Truth of the 9/11 Pentagon Attack


Tystick

Recommended Posts

I don't think anyone doubts that Bush was Machiavellian enough to pull it off but it doesn't necessarily make it true. I think it was tower 9 in New York which crumbled on it's own with no relation to either World Trade tower. I found that more convincing than what was clearly a projectile of some sort with a definite hit on the side on the Pentagon.

Bush may well be a war criminal but I highly doubt any of this was self inflicted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are we still doing this? Wow.

You conspiracists are giving the US government WAY too much credit. The logistics needed to pull off such a huge conspiracy is basically impossible. No government or agency in the world could pull that off and would be stupid to risk it. Makes 0 sense.

There is no way to be sure how buildings react to jet liners crashing into them. It doesn't happen often and even if it did, every crash will have new factors not being able to take into consideration.

Bottom line is theorists are just filling in the blanks with what they want. We could sit here and do that all day, assuming its fact when it's not. This conspiracy makes 0 sense to attempt and would be impossible to pull off.

The government and the agencies connected to it simply don't have the ability to successfully mount such an operation. As well again it makes absolutely 0 sense. Same government thought there were WMD in Iraq and couldn't even get that intel right. And you think they could pull this off?

Keep dreaming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice find Heretic! I think people don't understand speed and the physics of impact. This is why people get killed on highways because they underestimate the risks and don't get the concept the faster you go, the longer it takes to stop, and the handling is more touchy. Modern aircraft with its amazing engineering the primary component of the structure is aluminum. So in essence you're sitting in a flying beer can, with fuel and engines in the wings.

Back in 1979 American Airlines Flight 191 had an engine fall off shortly after take off, damaging the wing, and some of the electrical and hydraulic systems. The result is the aircraft stalled and impacted the ground at about 300 km/h. The impact site was clearly seen, but the plane looked like it was vaporized. The Pentagon was lucky, if the aircraft attacked at a high angle and a higher speed there might have been a lot more severe damage.

Here's pictures of Flight 191. You can read about it on Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AA_191

Aa191_ohare_zps30122037.jpg

AA191-crash-site_zpse76fdc8b.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice find Heretic! I think people don't understand speed and the physics of impact. This is why people get killed on highways because they underestimate the risks and don't get the concept the faster you go, the longer it takes to stop, and the handling is more touchy. Modern aircraft with its amazing engineering the primary component of the structure is aluminum. So in essence you're sitting in a flying beer can, with fuel and engines in the wings.

Back in 1979 American Airlines Flight 191 had an engine fall off shortly after take off, damaging the wing, and some of the electrical and hydraulic systems. The result is the aircraft stalled and impacted the ground at about 300 km/h. The impact site was clearly seen, but the plane looked like it was vaporized. The Pentagon was lucky, if the aircraft attacked at a high angle and a higher speed there might have been a lot more severe damage.

Here's pictures of Flight 191. You can read about it on Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AA_191

Aa191_ohare_zps30122037.jpg

AA191-crash-site_zpse76fdc8b.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are we still doing this? Wow.

You conspiracists are giving the US government WAY too much credit. The logistics needed to pull off such a huge conspiracy is basically impossible. No government or agency in the world could pull that off and would be stupid to risk it. Makes 0 sense.

There is no way to be sure how buildings react to jet liners crashing into them. It doesn't happen often and even if it did, every crash will have new factors not being able to take into consideration.

Bottom line is theorists are just filling in the blanks with what they want. We could sit here and do that all day, assuming its fact when it's not. This conspiracy makes 0 sense to attempt and would be impossible to pull off.

The government and the agencies connected to it simply don't have the ability to successfully mount such an operation. As well again it makes absolutely 0 sense. Same government thought there were WMD in Iraq and couldn't even get that intel right. And you think they could pull this off?

Keep dreaming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...