Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

kanucks1

(Proposal) Van-Buf Van Chi

54 posts in this topic

To Van- Drew Stafford,Marcus Foligno, Andrej Sekera.

To Buf- Edler, Raymond.

Again,only if we can't get edler signed. I'm against trading Hansen but I think this is a good deal.

To Van- Shaw and a 2012 1st,Hayes

To Chi- Luongo,3rd 2013

Lineup

Sedin-Sedin-Burrows

Booth-Kesler-Stafford

Foligno-Lapierre-Hansen

Higgins-Malholtra-Kassian

Shaw-Weise

Hamhuis-Bieksa

Sekera-Garrison

Ballard-Tanev

Schneider

Lack

This is getting younger with still keeping all our core.

Thanks.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We get pretty bone'd in the second deal.. And I wouldn't trade Hansen in the first deal

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't do the 1st trade, and for the second, I'd take out Emery, and Hayes and add a 1st rd pick on their side. Shaw looks really promising.

And to the Mods, PLEASE GET RID OF THE FACEPALM ICON!!!!! I'M BEGGING YOU! IT'S REDICULOUS TO THINK SOMEONE CAN'T COME UP WITH A WELL-THOUGHT OUT RESPONSE SO THEY JUST ADD AN EMOTICON EVERY FRIGGIN' TIME THEY DON'T LIKE A POST.

Really guys....be creative, and don't be a doucher

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't do the 1st trade, and for the second, I'd take out Emery, and Hayes and add a 1st rd pick on their side. Shaw looks really promising.

And to the Mods, PLEASE GET RID OF THE FACEPALM ICON!!!!! I'M BEGGING YOU! IT'S REDICULOUS TO THINK SOMEONE CAN'T COME UP WITH A WELL-THOUGHT OUT RESPONSE SO THEY JUST ADD AN EMOTICON EVERY FRIGGIN' TIME THEY DON'T LIKE A POST.

Really guys....be creative, and don't be a doucher

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't do the 1st trade, and for the second, I'd take out Emery, and Hayes and add a 1st rd pick on their side. Shaw looks really promising.

And to the Mods, PLEASE GET RID OF THE FACEPALM ICON!!!!! I'M BEGGING YOU! IT'S REDICULOUS TO THINK SOMEONE CAN'T COME UP WITH A WELL-THOUGHT OUT RESPONSE SO THEY JUST ADD AN EMOTICON EVERY FRIGGIN' TIME THEY DON'T LIKE A POST.

Really guys....be creative, and don't be a doucher

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Buffalo doesn't do the first trade. Sekera was arguably the best d-man for the Sabres last year. Sabres need offense as well so trading Stafford away is unlikely unless another top six forward would be coming back. Edler also probably wouldn't re-sign in Buffalo

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With Shaw we could be getting a future 50-60 point guy. and Hayes is tough, big at 6-6 and skilled for a guy that size which will help in the playoffs. Foligno got 13 points in 14 games last year and stafford would be amazing with Kesler and Booth,He is already a 50 point guy and Sekera is a good defenceman on both ends of the ice.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think if Luongo's going to Chicago, the Hawks would have to give us at least one of their core pieces in return as with Luongo we may be handing them another Cup. Maybe Shaw and Bolland for Luongo and a 2nd?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wish he didn't edit most of his proposal. Now our comments aren't going to make any sense to the next readers

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would make both of these trades and be very happy.

Not too sure if they would do them, but the value is pretty fair.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Buffalo doesn't do the first trade. Sekera was arguably the best d-man for the Sabres last year. Sabres need offense as well so trading Stafford away is unlikely unless another top six forward would be coming back. Edler also probably wouldn't re-sign in Buffalo

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wish he didn't edit most of his proposal. Now our comments aren't going to make any sense to the next readers

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And sorry for the facepalm, but the Canucks get robbed in both deals.... Edler alone could get that from Buffalo and the same is true with Luono in the Chicago deal. Evennthen, i still wouldn't do either of them

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would only do these trades if Edler would cost too much for us or doesn't want to resign.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think if Luongo's going to Chicago, the Hawks would have to give us at least one of their core pieces in return as with Luongo we may be handing them another Cup. Maybe Shaw and Bolland for Luongo and a 2nd?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.