kanucks1 Posted September 22, 2012 Share Posted September 22, 2012 To Van- Drew Stafford,Marcus Foligno, Andrej Sekera. To Buf- Edler, Raymond. Again,only if we can't get edler signed. I'm against trading Hansen but I think this is a good deal. To Van- Shaw and a 2012 1st,Hayes To Chi- Luongo,3rd 2013 Lineup Sedin-Sedin-Burrows Booth-Kesler-Stafford Foligno-Lapierre-Hansen Higgins-Malholtra-Kassian Shaw-Weise Hamhuis-Bieksa Sekera-Garrison Ballard-Tanev Schneider Lack This is getting younger with still keeping all our core. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wheels22 Posted September 22, 2012 Share Posted September 22, 2012 We get pretty bone'd in the second deal.. And I wouldn't trade Hansen in the first deal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanucksFanMike Posted September 22, 2012 Share Posted September 22, 2012 no, just no Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted September 22, 2012 Share Posted September 22, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kanucks1 Posted September 22, 2012 Author Share Posted September 22, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted September 22, 2012 Share Posted September 22, 2012 Whats wrong with it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zoolander Posted September 22, 2012 Share Posted September 22, 2012 I wouldn't do the 1st trade, and for the second, I'd take out Emery, and Hayes and add a 1st rd pick on their side. Shaw looks really promising. And to the Mods, PLEASE GET RID OF THE FACEPALM ICON!!!!! I'M BEGGING YOU! IT'S REDICULOUS TO THINK SOMEONE CAN'T COME UP WITH A WELL-THOUGHT OUT RESPONSE SO THEY JUST ADD AN EMOTICON EVERY FRIGGIN' TIME THEY DON'T LIKE A POST. Really guys....be creative, and don't be a doucher Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kanucks1 Posted September 22, 2012 Author Share Posted September 22, 2012 I wouldn't do the 1st trade, and for the second, I'd take out Emery, and Hayes and add a 1st rd pick on their side. Shaw looks really promising. And to the Mods, PLEASE GET RID OF THE FACEPALM ICON!!!!! I'M BEGGING YOU! IT'S REDICULOUS TO THINK SOMEONE CAN'T COME UP WITH A WELL-THOUGHT OUT RESPONSE SO THEY JUST ADD AN EMOTICON EVERY FRIGGIN' TIME THEY DON'T LIKE A POST. Really guys....be creative, and don't be a doucher Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted September 22, 2012 Share Posted September 22, 2012 I wouldn't do the 1st trade, and for the second, I'd take out Emery, and Hayes and add a 1st rd pick on their side. Shaw looks really promising. And to the Mods, PLEASE GET RID OF THE FACEPALM ICON!!!!! I'M BEGGING YOU! IT'S REDICULOUS TO THINK SOMEONE CAN'T COME UP WITH A WELL-THOUGHT OUT RESPONSE SO THEY JUST ADD AN EMOTICON EVERY FRIGGIN' TIME THEY DON'T LIKE A POST. Really guys....be creative, and don't be a doucher Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darkstar Posted September 22, 2012 Share Posted September 22, 2012 Buffalo doesn't do the first trade. Sekera was arguably the best d-man for the Sabres last year. Sabres need offense as well so trading Stafford away is unlikely unless another top six forward would be coming back. Edler also probably wouldn't re-sign in Buffalo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kanucks1 Posted September 22, 2012 Author Share Posted September 22, 2012 With Shaw we could be getting a future 50-60 point guy. and Hayes is tough, big at 6-6 and skilled for a guy that size which will help in the playoffs. Foligno got 13 points in 14 games last year and stafford would be amazing with Kesler and Booth,He is already a 50 point guy and Sekera is a good defenceman on both ends of the ice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanucksFanMike Posted September 22, 2012 Share Posted September 22, 2012 I think if Luongo's going to Chicago, the Hawks would have to give us at least one of their core pieces in return as with Luongo we may be handing them another Cup. Maybe Shaw and Bolland for Luongo and a 2nd? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wheels22 Posted September 22, 2012 Share Posted September 22, 2012 I wish he didn't edit most of his proposal. Now our comments aren't going to make any sense to the next readers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jägermeister Posted September 22, 2012 Share Posted September 22, 2012 I would make both of these trades and be very happy. Not too sure if they would do them, but the value is pretty fair. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kanucks1 Posted September 22, 2012 Author Share Posted September 22, 2012 Buffalo doesn't do the first trade. Sekera was arguably the best d-man for the Sabres last year. Sabres need offense as well so trading Stafford away is unlikely unless another top six forward would be coming back. Edler also probably wouldn't re-sign in Buffalo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kanucks1 Posted September 22, 2012 Author Share Posted September 22, 2012 I wish he didn't edit most of his proposal. Now our comments aren't going to make any sense to the next readers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanucksFanMike Posted September 22, 2012 Share Posted September 22, 2012 Whats wrong with it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kanucks1 Posted September 22, 2012 Author Share Posted September 22, 2012 And sorry for the facepalm, but the Canucks get robbed in both deals.... Edler alone could get that from Buffalo and the same is true with Luono in the Chicago deal. Evennthen, i still wouldn't do either of them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kanucks1 Posted September 22, 2012 Author Share Posted September 22, 2012 I would only do these trades if Edler would cost too much for us or doesn't want to resign. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zoolander Posted September 22, 2012 Share Posted September 22, 2012 I think if Luongo's going to Chicago, the Hawks would have to give us at least one of their core pieces in return as with Luongo we may be handing them another Cup. Maybe Shaw and Bolland for Luongo and a 2nd? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.