kanucks1 Posted September 29, 2012 Share Posted September 29, 2012 To Van:Pavelski,Clowe. To SJS:Edler,Hansen,Raymond,Schroeder,1st 2013. Then..... To Van: Babchuk To Cgy:Rodin,2nd 2013. Lineup Sedin-Sedin-Burrows Clowe-Kesler-Pavelski Booth-Malholtra-Kassian Higgins-Lapierre-Weise Volpatti-Ebbett Hamhuis-Bieksa Babchuk-Garisson Ballard-Tanev Alberts Schneider Luongo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darkstar Posted September 29, 2012 Share Posted September 29, 2012 San Jose doesn't need defense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted September 29, 2012 Share Posted September 29, 2012 San Jose isn't trading Pavelski. And if we're getting one of the best power forwards in the game, we aren't sticking him on the third line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanucksFanMike Posted September 29, 2012 Share Posted September 29, 2012 As much as i think Pavelski would be a terrific fit in our lineup, I wouldn't do the first deal. The second one i might consider if the 2nd round pick was a lower round... as it stands right now we are overpaying Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimLahey Posted September 29, 2012 Share Posted September 29, 2012 You're a sexy, young, intelligent young man, what kind of shampoo do you use OP? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tortorella's Rant Posted September 29, 2012 Share Posted September 29, 2012 The Calgary trade doesn't work because they actually think they can make the playoffs and be a threat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jägermeister Posted September 29, 2012 Share Posted September 29, 2012 Can't see San Jose making the deal. If they are truly going to revamp their offence I would imagine it being Thornton or Marleau on their way out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
logic Posted September 29, 2012 Share Posted September 29, 2012 Clowe is a waste of talent on the third Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kanucks1 Posted September 29, 2012 Author Share Posted September 29, 2012 I now put CLowe on the second line and Booth on the third. We can move around to see what fits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kanucks1 Posted September 29, 2012 Author Share Posted September 29, 2012 What do you guys think of the trade value wise??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kanucks1 Posted September 29, 2012 Author Share Posted September 29, 2012 I think it's fair but could use a little tweaking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alchemy Time Posted September 29, 2012 Share Posted September 29, 2012 Take out the Calgary trade completely. Instead of Clowe in the SJ trade, add Rodin to our side and put in Burns. Then this is our line-up. Top six: Sedin Sedin Burrows Booth Kesler Pavelski D pairings: Garrison-Burns Hamhuis-Bieksa Ballard-Tanev And San Jose's Top six: Marleau-Thorton-Clowe Havlat-Couture-Shepard D pairings: Edler-Boyle Murray-Demers Stuart-Vlasic Instant guaranteed Conference finalists. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kanucks1 Posted September 29, 2012 Author Share Posted September 29, 2012 Take out the Calgary trade completely. Instead of Clowe in the SJ trade, add Rodin to our side and put in Burns. Then this is our line-up. Top six: Sedin Sedin Burrows Booth Kesler Pavelski D pairings: Garrison-Burns Hamhuis-Bieksa Ballard-Tanev And San Jose's Top six: Marleau-Thorton-Clowe Havlat-Couture-Shepard D pairings: Edler-Boyle Murray-Demers Stuart-Vlasic Instant guaranteed Conference finalists. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwarrior Posted October 1, 2012 Share Posted October 1, 2012 no way san jose makes that deal, if they wouldnt move either of them for rick nash, why would they for that return? and no to the 2nd trade, im not a fan of inter division trades, nor am i a fan of any calgary dman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kanucks1 Posted October 2, 2012 Author Share Posted October 2, 2012 no way san jose makes that deal, if they wouldnt move either of them for rick nash, why would they for that return? and no to the 2nd trade, im not a fan of inter division trades, nor am i a fan of any calgary dman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted October 2, 2012 Share Posted October 2, 2012 ?.... Its for a pick and not that good of a propect! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.