Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

kanucks1

(Proposal) Van-Tampa Van-Tor

14 posts in this topic

To Van: Purcell,Malone,Aulie,2nd 2013.

To Tampa: Edler,Booth,Hansen.

Then...

To Van: Gardiner,2nd 2013.

To Tor: Luongo.

Lineup.

Sedin-Sedin-Purcell

Malone-Kesler-Burrows

Raymond-Lapierre-Kassian

Higgins-Malholtra-Weise

Volpatti-Ebbett

Hamhuis-Bieksa

Gardiner-Garisson

Ballard-Tanev

Schneider

Lack.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To Van: Purcell,Malone,Aulie,2nd 2012.

To Tampa: Edler,Booth,Hansen.

Then...

To Van: Gardiner,2nd 2012.

To Tor: Luongo.

Lineup.

Sedin-Sedin-Purcell

Malone-Kesler-Burrows

Raymond-Lapierre-Kassian

Higgins-Malholtra-Weise

Volpatti-Ebbett

Hamhuis-Bieksa

Gardiner-Garisson

Ballard-Tanev

Schneider

Lack.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sooo would we get their prospects? Or are you just un-aware, that draft has already passed.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Zero cance Toronto does that deal, Burke has already stated that Gardiner is going nowhere and no thanks to the Tampa deal.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No to the first trade, Id rather keep Hansen and Booth then have Purcell and Malone, And Edler is worth waaaay more then Aulie + 2nd

Toronto says no to the second trade, even though I think Luongo is easily worth Gardiner + 2nd, Toronto believes Gardiner is their savior and wont trade him for anything that isnt an overpayment.

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Overpayment in the first deal, 2nd one seems fair but Burkie says no cause he wont trade Gardiner.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't give up booth, edler, hansen for Malone, Aulie and a 2nd - huge overpayment.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't give up booth, edler, hansen for Malone, Aulie and a 2nd - huge overpayment.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Overpayment in the Tampa deal.

Underpayment in the Toronto deal.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The first trade doesn't make any sense. You're essentially trading Edler for Aulie and a 2nd, Booth for Malone, and Hansen for Purcell. In short term, its like doing a trade for the sake of doing a trade.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Burke, he's loveable for this, is a windbag!

He also stated at one point that Schenn would not be traded, not for 5 (or was it ten) first round pick's? Then he summarily shopped him for a year and a half. Ultimately to get JVR a former top 5 pick, not a bad haul but only a single good prospect.

He also said he would have taken Morgan Reilly first overall. Maybe that means he's on the trade block? Anyway, I wouldn't assume Gardiner would not be traded. It's just Burke's Irish eye's twinkling for the best suitor he can find. If he talks his asset's up enough maybe he can steal a deal.

No to the first trade, Id rather keep Hansen and Booth then have Purcell and Malone, And Edler is worth waaaay more then Aulie + 2nd

Toronto says no to the second trade, even though I think Luongo is easily worth Gardiner + 2nd, Toronto believes Gardiner is their savior and wont trade him for anything that isnt an overpayment.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.