Sup CROW Posted October 12, 2012 Share Posted October 12, 2012 So here it is CDC To Vancouver: Magnus Paraavi To Edmonton: Chris Tanev What do you guys think? Go easy on me it's my first proposal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex Burrows 14 Posted October 12, 2012 Share Posted October 12, 2012 Not bad but i dont want to trade tanev. I think paarvii can be had fairly easily so hwbout sauve and a second? I would love paarvii tho, just not for tanev. But the trade makes a lot of sense for both teams. Fair value also Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King of the ES Posted October 12, 2012 Share Posted October 12, 2012 So here it is CDC To Vancouver: Magnus Paraavi To Edmonton: Chris Tanev What do you guys think? Go easy on me it's my first proposal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goalie13 Posted October 12, 2012 Share Posted October 12, 2012 What do you guys think? Go easy on me it's my first proposal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red-Haired_Shanks Posted October 12, 2012 Share Posted October 12, 2012 So here it is CDC To Vancouver: Magnus Paraavi To Edmonton: Chris Tanev What do you guys think? Go easy on me it's my first proposal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billabong Posted October 12, 2012 Share Posted October 12, 2012 fair but come on why waste your time on a deal between two teams who you know arent gonna trade Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanucksFanMike Posted October 12, 2012 Share Posted October 12, 2012 I wouldn't do it..... I think Tanev is a really solid prospect with huge potential Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
c00kies Posted October 12, 2012 Share Posted October 12, 2012 fair but come on why waste your time on a deal between two teams who you know arent gonna trade Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elvis15 Posted October 12, 2012 Share Posted October 12, 2012 More reasonable than many on this board, so kudos for not trying to do a 3 pieces per team 3 way trade in your first proposal. Paajarvi is on the outside looking in with Edmonton, and they could use defence, but for us to move Tanev it would leave a gap in the D-men we have that can play the right side well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Bissonnette Posted October 12, 2012 Share Posted October 12, 2012 You copied this from hfboards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King of the ES Posted October 13, 2012 Share Posted October 13, 2012 More reasonable than many on this board, so kudos for not trying to do a 3 pieces per team 3 way trade in your first proposal. Paajarvi is on the outside looking in with Edmonton, and they could use defence, but for us to move Tanev it would leave a gap in the D-men we have that can play the right side well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted October 13, 2012 Share Posted October 13, 2012 Maybe, but that's like arguing over who the tallest midget is. There is NO FREAKING WAY that Edmonton would even consider trading the 10th overall pick from 2009, for a guy who is older, undrafted, and less proven at the NHL level. Seriously, think about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King of the ES Posted October 13, 2012 Share Posted October 13, 2012 You're over-rating Paajarvi and under-rating Tanev. If you care to research, Paajarvi couldn't even crack the Oilers line up most of the year and spent time with the Barons, while Tanev is looking to be a very steady, calm D man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elvis15 Posted October 13, 2012 Share Posted October 13, 2012 You're over-rating Paajarvi and under-rating Tanev. If you care to research, Paajarvi couldn't even crack the Oilers line up most of the year and spent time with the Barons, while Tanev is looking to be a very steady, calm D man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smashian Kassian Posted October 13, 2012 Share Posted October 13, 2012 Paajarvi spent more time with Edmonton last year than Tanev did with Vancouver. Paajarvi is also 2 years younger, and has 42 points in 121 NHL games. Slightly better than Tanev's record of 3 points in 54 games. Yes, he's a defenceman. But it's not hard for defencemen like Tanev to just sort of "blend in" and not really be noticed, which translates into a serious over-valuing by the local fans. Yann Sauve didn't look too out of place, did he? And do you remember Evan Oberg? He was the Chris Tanev before Chris Tanev arrived. And then he got traded. Hasn't done much since. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ConnorFutureGM Posted October 13, 2012 Share Posted October 13, 2012 Paajarvi is playing on the left wing with RNH and Eberle on the Barons this upcoming AHL season. Oilers still think there is a player in Paajarvi so they aren't going to give him up unless he's in a package for a superstar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elvis15 Posted October 13, 2012 Share Posted October 13, 2012 Paajarvi is playing on the left wing with RNH and Eberle on the Barons this upcoming AHL season. Oilers still think there is a player in Paajarvi so they aren't going to give him up unless he's in a package for a superstar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billabong Posted October 13, 2012 Share Posted October 13, 2012 Both of the players involved appear to be solid depth players, but not superstars or core players. This deal's magnitude could easily be a reason for these two teams being able to make this trade. Although Paarjarvi seems to have a better possible ceiling (maybe 2nd line winger), both seems to be support players, and Edmonton does need young d-men. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dion Phaneuf Posted October 13, 2012 Share Posted October 13, 2012 I would take that deal and run. Tanev is a decent defencemen but he'll never be more than a defensive specialist. He has next to no offence in his game although he has an excellent breakout pass. Realisticay, I believe that Tanev will be a serviceable defencemen whose comparable to Mike Weaver. Paajarvi has loads of potential still and generally speaking Euros take longer to develop than North Americans. Paajarvi could be a good 2nd/3rd line forward or he could simply bust. I'd take the risk... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ConnorFutureGM Posted October 13, 2012 Share Posted October 13, 2012 The thing is Paajarvi is so sound defensively with physical assets he will always have a job in the NHL. He cheats to play defence (he played as a defenceman until he was a teenager). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.