Jump to content

Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Photo
* * - - - 3 votes

*Official* CBA Negotiations and Lockout Thread


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
6226 replies to this topic

#2941 poetica

poetica

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,352 posts
  • Joined: 09-June 11

Posted 20 November 2012 - 12:14 PM

Excellent link you provided poetica. According to this the PA share would be between 64.4% and 70.3% next year and it never gets to 50-50.


You're right, it was a good link as it had some very interesting information about the current bone of economic contention. However, a point you seem to have missed is that the NHL was using the PA's projections OF FULL SEASONS against their projections including a truncated lockout season to come up with those numbers. As a result, those numbers do not accurate represent the union's proposal as the NHL was comparing apples and oranges to come up with them.

As Bookie's message aptly quoted from the very story you quoted, the union has been very clear about wanting to get a deal done based on full seasons and only then working backwards to address a shortened season if there even was one to be addressed. Their next proposal may very well address a shortened season at the NHL's request, though it still seems like a silly waste of time to talk about how to deal with the lockout until you know how much hockey will have been lost for sure.
  • 0
Go, Canucks, Go!
Every single one of them.

Thanks for the memories, Luo! :'(

#2942 poetica

poetica

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,352 posts
  • Joined: 09-June 11

Posted 20 November 2012 - 12:19 PM

Ooh....Now the word opinion has meaning lol...


All words have meaning. That's the basis for language.
  • 0
Go, Canucks, Go!
Every single one of them.

Thanks for the memories, Luo! :'(

#2943 Darth Kane

Darth Kane

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,445 posts
  • Joined: 07-June 09

Posted 20 November 2012 - 03:00 PM

I don't really care anymore...just wake me up when they start playing again. This is my reaction to any CBA news:

Posted Image
  • 0

#2944 canucksnihilist

canucksnihilist

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,372 posts
  • Joined: 14-June 11

Posted 20 November 2012 - 03:25 PM

All words have meaning. That's the basis for language.


words don't mean anything intrinsically. they are symbols that are interpreted in many different ways depending on intellectual, cultural, and more to the point here - emotional context. depending on who says them, they will mean different things... and sometimes they actually do mean nothing (unless you count the absence of meaning to impart meaning...).

both of you are making the words mean what you want to support your points. Or maybe just one of you, I couldn't be bothered to read all the ad hominem to be honest... but I'm hoping this shuts you up.

Words only have meaning because we agree on what they mean, there is no true objective meaning. welcome back in time to the 20th century btw... circa Wittgenstein 1950 something...
  • 0

#2945 poetica

poetica

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,352 posts
  • Joined: 09-June 11

Posted 20 November 2012 - 03:42 PM

words don't mean anything intrinsically.
...
Words only have meaning because we agree on what they mean, there is no true objective meaning.


Right. Words have meaning because we agree they do, thus allowing us to use them to create language, like I said in response to the equally pointless comment that "now the word opinion has meaning." Thanks for uselessly expounding on the concept. Way to Google!

but I'm hoping this shuts you up.


Instead of making rude comments in an declared effort to shut people up, just grow up and ignore posts from people you don't want to read.
  • 0
Go, Canucks, Go!
Every single one of them.

Thanks for the memories, Luo! :'(

#2946 chisoxin12

chisoxin12

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,610 posts
  • Joined: 28-July 09

Posted 20 November 2012 - 03:58 PM

I like how you edited your post lol. Did you find something that needed correcting? lol!Really, DID YOU!?!?!Bet you did....so with that...take your own advice sir...{Points and laffs}

I was trying to spell idiot, points and laffs!

Edited by chisoxin12, 20 November 2012 - 03:59 PM.

  • 0

#2947 fwybwed

fwybwed

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,936 posts
  • Joined: 13-January 03

Posted 20 November 2012 - 04:25 PM

I was trying to spell idiot, points and laffs!


In that case you spelled "Laughs" wrong hahahaa Idiot and Points are correct.
  • 0

#2948 poetica

poetica

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,352 posts
  • Joined: 09-June 11

Posted 20 November 2012 - 04:32 PM

Darren Dreger@DarrenDreger
PA intends on continuing to strategize and work on its presentation tonight for tomorrows next round of CBA negotiations.



Darren Dreger@DarrenDreger
PA confirms meeting tomorrow morning. Roughly, 10 am start.


  • 0
Go, Canucks, Go!
Every single one of them.

Thanks for the memories, Luo! :'(

#2949 poetica

poetica

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,352 posts
  • Joined: 09-June 11

Posted 20 November 2012 - 05:28 PM

NHL lockout: NHLPA, league finding common ground

It looks like Canada Day will no longer be NHL free agency day.

While the NHLPA spent Tuesday pondering whether to make a fresh offer, details of what has been already been agreed to — and where the NHL has bent — are beginning to emerge.

The Star has learned that the day free agents are declared is on the move from July 1 to mid- to late June. It’s one of 13 NHLPA issues (out of 17) that NHL commissioner Gary Bettman has publicly acknowledged the league has “agreed” to.

“Agreed” may be too strong a word, though.

“Right now, nothing is agreed on because we won’t agree to anything until we get a deal on core economics,” said one insider familiar with the NHL’s positions. “But this is stuff where we said, ‘Okay, we’ll go there.’ ”

There’s no question the key issues — money (including revenue sharing), contract restraints and who pays for damage caused by the lockout — remain outstanding. Just how far the NHLPA moves, if it does indeed make a substantial new offer, will determine where talks are headed. But the sides have already found common ground in some areas and the NHL has moved off some hardline positions. Here’s where things stand heading into Wednesday’s pivotal meeting:

COMMON GROUND
The sides have more or less agreed to:

  • Change the free agent calendar, meaning the market would open on June 15 or 48 hours after the awarding of the Stanley Cup — the players want whichever is later — instead of July 1. Arbitration dates may change as well.
  • Allow cap space to be included in transactions, to encourage trades and get teams out from under heavy contracts.
  • A joint health committee.
  • Eliminate re-entry waivers.
  • A neutral, third-party arbitrator to deal with appeals for on- and off-ice discipline.
  • Minimum roster requirements to avoid situations where teams dress fewer than 18 players to save salary cap room.
GETTING CLOSER
The NHL has moved closer to the NHLPA position on:
  • Entry-level contracts. The league wants a two-year limit. The players want to leave it at three.
  • AHL salaries. The league is offering to count only those that exceed the NHL minimum ($525,000) against a team’s cap. The NHL had wanted the number closer to $95,000. The victory for the PA here is that AHL players won’t have their salaries count against the players’ share of hockey-related revenue. Accounting would be limited to players in the NHL.
  • Unrestricted free agency. The league is offering freedom after eight years of service or age 28, after asking for 10 years. This year, players could become free agents after seven years of service, or age 27.
  • Maintaining salary arbitration, but with eligibility pushed back to a player’s fifth season. The players are asking for arbitration after four years. The NHL initially wanted it abolished.
STICKING POINTS
50/50: Both sides have agreed, on the surface, to a 50-50 split of hockey-related revenue. The players want to get there eventually by guaranteeing certain dollar amounts — starting with the $1.88 billion they earned last season — will be paid over the first few years of a deal. In percentage of expected revenue, the players are closer to 56 per cent. The NHL wants a strict 50-50 split, with some provisions outside the cap to ensure players under contract get paid in full.

Revenue sharing: The players want a bigger pool of money — about $240 million — for the smaller teams. The NHL has increased the amount it would put into the pool to about $200 million.

Contract restraints: The NHL has wanted five-year limits on all deals with no more than a five per cent variation from year to year. The NHLPA seems ready to help teams find a way to discourage back-diving deals, but doesn’t like how strict the NHL’s proposals are.

Lockout damage: Who pays for the financial cost of the lockout? The league sees that as 50-50. The NHLPA wants the league to pay the lion’s share.

THE SKINNY
The NHLPA’s position is that none of the issues are settled — that they are all linked to the restraints the NHL wants. Both sides agree that anything can change, with nothing agreed to in writing.
“This is all minor stuff,” one insider said. “It’s great we have deals on these things, but they’re not changing the world.”

Source: http://www.thestar.c...posal-wednesday
  • 0
Go, Canucks, Go!
Every single one of them.

Thanks for the memories, Luo! :'(

#2950 The Bookie

The Bookie

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,663 posts
  • Joined: 10-May 10

Posted 20 November 2012 - 05:34 PM

What does it mean by 'Allow cap space to be included in transactions, to encourage trades and get teams out from under heavy contracts.'? Does that mean if, say, the Islanders have $10 million in unused cap space, they can trade $2 million to us for a player? If so, does it have to be tied to a player transaction, or could two teams trade cap space for draft picks etc?
  • 0

#2951 poetica

poetica

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,352 posts
  • Joined: 09-June 11

Posted 20 November 2012 - 05:37 PM

What does it mean by 'Allow cap space to be included in transactions, to encourage trades and get teams out from under heavy contracts.'? Does that mean if, say, the Islanders have $10 million in unused cap space, they can trade $2 million to us for a player? If so, does it have to be tied to a player transaction, or could two teams trade cap space for draft picks etc?


I'm wondering about that too. It could be a cap trade like you suggested, or it could be (being that it specifically noted "heavy contracts") that teams will have to trade some cap space with a player with a back-diving contract instead of keeping part of their contract against their cap as had previously been suggested.
  • 0
Go, Canucks, Go!
Every single one of them.

Thanks for the memories, Luo! :'(

#2952 thad

thad

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,908 posts
  • Joined: 09-February 09

Posted 20 November 2012 - 06:00 PM

i dont understand the NHL saying they consistantly move and the players have not moved at all? every single proposal from either side is taking away from the players from the last CBA. I understand the entire point of all this to take away from the players, but it sounds pretty stupid from a fans standpoint when the players arent going to win anything in this but just save from what is being taken away from their last cba.
  • 0

#2953 Blackberries

Blackberries

    Canucks Franchise Player

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,184 posts
  • Joined: 30-August 07

Posted 20 November 2012 - 07:05 PM

sounds like a bit of progress is being made. Assuming Versteeg and Ian White don't have that much of a say, im becoming cautiously optimistic.
  • 0
Posted Image
Movember Kassian

#2954 The Bookie

The Bookie

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,663 posts
  • Joined: 10-May 10

Posted 20 November 2012 - 07:26 PM

A closer look at the NHLPA's last offer – and what may be next
(edit - the formatting in the charts seemed to really mess up after copy/pasting, so I recommend clicking through to the original article. I'll leave this here though in case anyone has maxed out their Globe&Mail paywall allowance)


And so we wait.
As the lockout rolls into Month No. 3, the NHL has asked the players to serve up a full proposal, something the NHLPA is working on into the night in order to present it by 10 a.m. Wednesday morning.
Details as to what it may include are relatively thin, but what is available is the economic system the union put on the table about 10 days ago when negotiations broke down into a shouting match between players and owners.
Posted Image
ANALYSIS

Analysis: Why the NHL players’ 50-50 compromise may not matter

The players' proposal at that point was based on taking the $1.883-billion share they received last season and simply adding 1.75 per cent to it each season.
It was also reliant on the notion of NHL revenues continuing to grow from the $3.303-billion they hit last season. If hockey-related revenues increased by 5 per cent each season (including the current, locked out one), the players' share would shrink from 57 per cent last season to 55.2, 53.5, 51.9, 50.3 and 48.7 over the next five years.
Sounds good, right? A players' share of less than 50 per cent?
Here's the obvious issue: NHL revenues are not going to increase 5 per cent this season. In fact, the league already estimates they'll drop some $400-million to the $2.9-billion range, and that's if the season starts on Dec. 1, which is looking less and less likely by the day.
That makes it virtually impossible to set a guaranteed share like the players have in their proposal, as no one truly knows where revenues will be for not only 2012-13, but every season after that.
Will yet another lockout pull revenues down for years?
Or will this be a temporary one-year blip?
The best way to illustrate all of this is to simply present the financials in chart form. One word of caution, though: I've organized this information as if NHL revenues were going to increase by 5 per cent a season, something that is a virtual impossibility now.
I'll explain why below (note: all dollar figures are in millions):

NHLPA offer


League revenues






Players share






Percentage


2011-12



$3,303.0






$1,883.0






57.0%





2012-13




$3,468.2






$1,916.0






55.2%


2013-14



$3,641.6






$1,949.5






53.5%


2014-15



$3,823.6






$1,983.6






51.9%


2015-16



$4,014.8






$2,018.3






50.3%


2016-17



$4,215.6






$2,053.6






48.7%





Total




$19,163.7


[
[size=3]As you can see, the differences between these two offers, if revenues grew at this rate, are pretty negligible: Just $128-million over five years, or less than 0.7 per cent of total HRR over this time frame.[/size]
[size=3]That's basically nothing, which is what makes the fact this wasn't on the table back in October, when a full season could be salvaged and revenue gains likely factored in, a little infuriating.[/size]
[size=3]Now, I had attempted to rework the projected revenue figures and present the NHLPA's offer in that light, but it's exceptionally difficult to do so. Even if you simply scale down this year's share to account for the lost games and revenue, what then do you do in Year 2 and beyond?[/size]
[size=3]It's too hard to accurately determine, and we'd be guessing if we came up with a 2013-14 or 2014-15 projection.[/size]
[size=3](It's important to note here that the NHLPA has said it wanted to lay out an economic system first and then adjust it for the effects of the lockout. My issue with that is how on earth do you project what those effects will be?)[/size]
[size=3]There are positives buried in these figures. For one, the two sides are closer together than they were in October, as the numbers here show a gap of roughly $500-million before the NHL agreed to pay $211-million toward the make whole and the PA put together these new numbers.[/size]
[size=3]No. 2, the PA's ask of a 1.75 per cent increase, under normal circumstances, isn't unreasonable.[/size]
[size=3]Problem is these are hardly normal circumstances.[/size]
[size=3]Where do they go from here?[/size]
[size=3]Looking at the figures above, the players could theoretically put an agreement on the table that started at 55.2 per cent in Year 1 before trailing down to 50 per cent by Year 4.[/size]
[size=3]If NHL revenues fall to $2.9-billion in a shortened season, however, the players' share would dip to $1.6-billion and the notion of the league "making whole" pre-existing deals would be altered significantly.[/size]
[size=3]I'm not sure there's a way around that. Regardless of who either side believes caused this mess, the so-called pain of the lockout is going to have to be shared by both sides here or they'll never get a deal done.[/size]
[size=3]Perhaps the best way to resolve the conflict is ultimately a variation of the make whole provision: Anything above 50 per cent owed to the players in Years 1 and 2 is deferred down the road.[/size]
[size=3]But even if the players decide to deal in percentages instead of guaranteed increases for the first time, don't expect huge movement on the contractual issues in any proposal.[/size]
[size=3]There's a willingness to help the league eliminate the "back-diving" deals like the one Ilya Kovalchuk signed a couple years ago – perhaps even with the adoption of a 5 per cent year-by-year variance limit on contracts – but there's not much room for movement beyond that.[/size]
[size=3]Both sides are entrenched on the other issues, meaning even if there's movement in the right direction on the economics, it likely won't be enough.[/size]
[size=3]In some senses, they've never been closer. But getting through these final series of hoops will be the most difficult part of all.[/size]

[

Edited by The Bookie, 20 November 2012 - 07:31 PM.

  • 0

#2955 poetica

poetica

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,352 posts
  • Joined: 09-June 11

Posted 20 November 2012 - 08:24 PM

NHLPA set to deliver new CBA proposal

League demands formal offer from players to move talks forward


All eyes are on the NHL Players' Association.

With the lockout hitting Day 67 on Wednesday, the chances of a 2012-13 season could hang in the balance as the NHL and the union will head back to the table in New York to try to find common ground for a collective bargaining agreement.

While neither side showed any willingness to budge during a 90-minute session Monday night, NHLPA executive director Donald Fehr spent Tuesday huddled with his closest advisors working a on a new proposal for the league.

The league has demanded a formal proposal -- without a 50-50 split tied to revenue projections -- from Fehr and the NHLPA if the process is going to move forward. The union is now considering its options but NHL deputy Bill Daly said in an email the league is expecting a new offer.

The two sides have agreed to resume negotiations at 10 a.m. Wednesday. Daly said he wasn't sure what to expect in the new proposal.

"(Special counsel) Steve (Fehr) and I spoke late (Monday) night, and he confirmed the union would spend the day working on something to present to us, hopefully as early as (Wednesday)," said Daly Tuesday morning.

Sources say the NHLPA is concerned about too many givebacks to the league at this juncture of the negotiations. Fehr and company don't believe this is the tipping point and the players aren't ready to cave as they prepare to lose their fourth paycheque next week.

Yes, the players want to get back to playing, but they also don't want to wave the white towel by offering up a proposal that the NHL is going to rush to accept. The players are willing to go to a 50-50 revenue split, but they want to make sure all contracts are honoured.

Even if the players do give up more on the core economic issues, including the 'Make Whole' for existing contracts, then the two sides still have to get past the contract issues which the league has maintained are non-negotiable because the two sides are past the point of give and take.

As reported Tuesday, Fehr has been getting pressure from some agents to get a deal done. Sportsnet's Nick Kypreos told his HockeyCentral at Noon audience "there are about a dozen" players -- some of them high profile -- putting pressure on the union to get a deal done.

It's no coincidence the likes of Tampa's Vinny Lecavalier and Martin St. Louis, along with former teammate Brad Richards of the Rangers, showed up at the negotiations this week. They want to see where the process is firsthand because all want to get back playing.

If there isn't a deal this week, or a sign that the two sides are at least making progress in discussions, the league will certainly pull the plug on two more weeks of the season -- all games through Dec. 15 plus the NHL all-star game in Columbus.

The question for the players is simple: Are these negotiations critical?

If they don't move a step closer to the NHL in this meeting, will the league slap a drop-dead date on Fehr and give the union a deadline to get a deal done so there's a meaningful season?

If the two sides can work out a deal in the next couple of weeks, they can still have a 50-to-60 game season. But there's still a huge gap to bridge if there's going to be an agreement and the players don't like the fact the league is demanding they put something on the table.

"It's our position we've made a couple comprehensive proposals in a row," said Daly. "We'd like to know where they are on all issues, and we asked them to put together a comprehensive proposal for us to consider."

The hockey world will wait with bated breath.

Source: http://www.torontosu...ew-cba-proposal
  • 0
Go, Canucks, Go!
Every single one of them.

Thanks for the memories, Luo! :'(

#2956 austy

austy

    Comets Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 355 posts
  • Joined: 07-December 08

Posted 20 November 2012 - 08:29 PM

...



The word "cancer" does not have to refer to the literal disease.




Stay in school, kid.

when versteeg said that bettman needed to be cut out I think he meant the disease, unless he doesn't like crabs?

Edited by austy, 20 November 2012 - 08:31 PM.

  • 0

please be gentle with my posts...I am Australian, hockey isnt my first language.

#2957 Alex Edler 23

Alex Edler 23

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 957 posts
  • Joined: 02-December 11

Posted 20 November 2012 - 10:35 PM

NHLPA expected to make new proposal Wednesday


By Chris Johnston, The Canadian Press November 20, 2012



NEW YORK, N.Y. - The NHL Players' Association expects to take at least one more day before responding to the league's request to see a full proposal in collective bargaining.
The union plans to work internally on Tuesday and could be ready to meet Wednesday, according to a spokesman.
The sides returned to the bargaining table for a 90-minute meeting on Monday night, where the league asked for a comprehensive offer on the split of revenue and player contract rights.
"We've never heard a full proposal from them," deputy commissioner Bill Daly said afterwards. "We've heard their proposal on economics, they're still suggesting that they're moving in our direction on economics. Until we know exactly where they stand on economics ... we think it's all tied together.
"We'd like to hear it all together."
Another issue the sides need to work out is how they pay for the damage caused by the lockout. In the NHLPA's most recent offer, which was tabled Nov. 7, the union asked for the players' share of revenues to jump in fixed increments of 1.75 per cent each season starting from the $1.883-billion they took in last year.
That proposal didn't include the mechanism that would be used to account for the reduced revenue generated during a shortened 2012-13 season.
The league and union must also find agreement on contract rules. The NHL would like to see entry-level contracts reduced to two years, unrestricted free agency pushed back to age 28 or eight years of service and all deals limited to five years maximum.
So far, the union has only shown a willingness to make system changes that would discourage teams from signing players to long-term, back-diving contracts.
Now into its 10th week, the lockout has already forced the cancellation of all regular-season games through Nov. 30 — and the league is expected to wipe more from the schedule in the coming days. The sides considered taking a break from negotiations last week, but the NHLPA urged the league to continue meeting.
"It's hard for me to see how you make an agreement if you aren't talking and so you talk," said NHLPA executive director Donald Fehr. "Sometimes it doesn't lead anywhere, perhaps very often it doesn't lead anywhere, but if you aren't talking it's 100 per cent sure it doesn't lead anywhere."

http://www.thescore.com/home/articles/383950-nhlpa-expected-to-make-new-proposal-wednesday
  • 0
Sig too big.

#2958 Drybone

Drybone

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,403 posts
  • Joined: 01-July 12

Posted 21 November 2012 - 12:05 AM

The NHLPA has now been ordered by Bettman to put together a deal. See how much power Fehr has?

When faced with this reality, he NOW claims they are putting together a 'new' proposal ? The owners have now completely painted Fehr into a corner where they HAVE to cave in completely.

The players must be SO PLEASED that they hired this guy. He is utterly useless.
  • 0
Posted Image

#2959 playboi19

playboi19

    Canucks All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 19,871 posts
  • Joined: 15-August 08

Posted 21 November 2012 - 12:13 AM

Free Agency before the draft. Dafuq
  • 0
Posted Image

#2960 Drybone

Drybone

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,403 posts
  • Joined: 01-July 12

Posted 21 November 2012 - 12:15 AM

Free Agency before the draft. Dafuq


I actually like it because the teams know where they stand before they draft.
  • 0
Posted Image

#2961 Lillooet_Hillbilly

Lillooet_Hillbilly

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 664 posts
  • Joined: 04-July 11

Posted 21 November 2012 - 12:22 AM

getting rid of the re-entry is the best thing in the world. Imagine all those guys that could play in the big leagues but can't because they would be claimed so they're left to suffer in the minors.
  • 0

#2962 oldnews

oldnews

    Canucks Franchise Player

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,151 posts
  • Joined: 30-March 11

Posted 21 November 2012 - 12:42 AM

The NHLPA has now been ordered by Bettman to put together a deal. See how much power Fehr has?

When faced with this reality, he NOW claims they are putting together a 'new' proposal ? The owners have now completely painted Fehr into a corner where they HAVE to cave in completely.

The players must be SO PLEASED that they hired this guy. He is utterly useless.


You seem absolutely committed to an outcome where there has been no negotiation, no compromise, no concessions.
That is the kind of thinking that gets nothing done.
One winner - the rightful holders of power, the owners. Absolute capitulation - the powerless little players.
Setting yourself up for disappointment? The NHL simply can't win with that approach.
The real world is nowhere near that simple - and the result will be nowhere near that simple.
Ideology is clouding your perception of reality.
There is a myth that there is a power that is held.
These parties were and will be partners again in the end - or both parties (and their clients) will (continue to) self-destruct - that is what it will take to make the NHL work again. Both sides will negotiate, both sides will compromise, both sides will come to a basis of partnership.
  • 4

#2963 Tangerines

Tangerines

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,936 posts
  • Joined: 18-January 12

Posted 21 November 2012 - 12:57 AM

You seem absolutely committed to an outcome where there has been no negotiation, no compromise, no concessions.
That is the kind of thinking that gets nothing done.
One winner - the rightful holders of power, the owners. Absolute capitulation - the powerless little players.
Setting yourself up for disappointment? The NHL simply can't win with that approach.
The real world is nowhere near that simple - and the result will be nowhere near that simple.
Ideology is clouding your perception of reality.
There is a myth that there is a power that is held.
These parties were and will be partners again in the end - or both parties (and their clients) will (continue to) self-destruct - that is what it will take to make the NHL work again. Both sides will negotiate, both sides will compromise, both sides will come to a basis of partnership.


^^^^^^^^^^^
You're so right IMO
  • 0

#2964 The Bookie

The Bookie

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,663 posts
  • Joined: 10-May 10

Posted 21 November 2012 - 01:31 AM

I actually like it because the teamsowners know where they stand before they draft.


ftfy
  • 0

#2965 Scoobydooby

Scoobydooby

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,388 posts
  • Joined: 17-January 08

Posted 21 November 2012 - 01:42 AM

The NHLPA has now been ordered by Bettman to put together a deal. See how much power Fehr has?

When faced with this reality, he NOW claims they are putting together a 'new' proposal ? The owners have now completely painted Fehr into a corner where they HAVE to cave in completely.

The players must be SO PLEASED that they hired this guy. He is utterly useless.


Soo many pages of this thread I have slogged through and you continue to banter on with this.. you can say the same bologne all you want it still won't make it true. Youre entitled to your opinion though no matter how foolish it makes you look.
It'd nice if you just saved us all the trouble of having to read your ramblings over and over again..
  • 1

Posted Image


#2966 -Vintage Canuck-

-Vintage Canuck-

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 64,581 posts
  • Joined: 24-May 10

Posted 21 November 2012 - 09:00 AM

NHLPA sends letter to Member of Parliament in Canada:

Exactly why the NHLPA sent an update on the CBA negotiations to a Member of Parliament in Canada isn’t clear – was it upon request? in hopes the federal government would step in and stop the lockout? – but ESPN’s Pierre LeBrun has published the entire letter, which is dated Monday.


The content of the missive is nothing new for those who have been following the NHL’s work stoppage – the union makes it clear that “the lockout was a unilateral decision taken by the owners” and that “negotiations could have continued while games were played.”


It’s also not clear if the letter was sent to one Member of Parliament or more (it’s simply addressed to “Member of Parliament”).


For PHT’s American readers who may not be familiar with federal politics up north, Canada is led by a majority Conservative Party government that doesn’t get a whole bunch of support from organized labor.


http://prohockeytalk..._medium=twitter
  • 0
Posted Image

#2967 Boudrias

Boudrias

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,636 posts
  • Joined: 14-January 04

Posted 21 November 2012 - 09:13 AM

You seem absolutely committed to an outcome where there has been no negotiation, no compromise, no concessions.
That is the kind of thinking that gets nothing done.
One winner - the rightful holders of power, the owners. Absolute capitulation - the powerless little players.
Setting yourself up for disappointment? The NHL simply can't win with that approach.
The real world is nowhere near that simple - and the result will be nowhere near that simple.
Ideology is clouding your perception of reality.
There is a myth that there is a power that is held.
These parties were and will be partners again in the end - or both parties (and their clients) will (continue to) self-destruct - that is what it will take to make the NHL work again. Both sides will negotiate, both sides will compromise, both sides will come to a basis of partnership.

I haven't read Drybone spouting any idealogy in this discussion. My take is he is questioning the fundamental negociating power of the NHLPA. His position might be considered extreme but does lie in the realm of possibility. 2004 was a capitulation by the union but the result, although very beneficial for the union, was not an industry solution. In a union vs ownership scenario I wonder if there ever will be a solution. Settlement yes, solution no.

This relationship should be a partnership but it will always be caste as the union being a junior partner. The NHL simply brings more to the table than players who will always be faced with the reality that their time is limited. This does not have to be a negative. The NHL has a history of players who move on to management positions and even some into ownership. This is something that should be matured into a strength in the relationship.
  • 0

#2968 Drybone

Drybone

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,403 posts
  • Joined: 01-July 12

Posted 21 November 2012 - 09:26 AM

Now Fehr has sent a letter to the canadian government whining and complaining . The union has made a horrible mistake in bringing Fehr on board.

The union has no hope of getting any kind of good deal, and they have lost a lot of money in salary they can never recover. The NHL will not give them even a fair deal as they blame the union for having them in this situation.

I would have offered the players 50/50 in return for 5 year max , higher UFA , easier ability to send players down to the minors, and other adjustments.

The union has not had a formal offer and now Bettman has them backed into a corner. All that is left is public perception. Bettman has played this one beautifully. He is forcing the union to put down a ridiculous offer on paper to discredit them, or an offer that is so modest the NHL accepts it and the union ends up with nothing.

Like him or not, there is a reason why he has been NHL commissioner for 20 years.

And in the end, I am on the fans side, and this idea that the union can just go get hired guns to BULLY the very league they play for has got to END.

From now on, let a panel of 3 federal judges hear the union and owners arguments.

Two from the US and one from Canada in an international court. Both sides have to agree to the ruling for 5 years.
  • 0
Posted Image

#2969 rotiman187

rotiman187

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,282 posts
  • Joined: 23-October 09

Posted 21 November 2012 - 09:42 AM

Renaud Lavoie ‏@RenLavoieRDS

Don Fehr:"NHL will respond to us around 1 PM."

Chris Johnston ‏@reporterchris

Donald Fehr says new proposal is "about as good we can do."

Please, just please let there be a breakthrough!

Edited by rotiman187, 21 November 2012 - 09:42 AM.

  • 0
Posted Image

#2970 Shift-4

Shift-4

    Canucks All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 19,452 posts
  • Joined: 11-August 06

Posted 21 November 2012 - 09:44 AM

Donald Fehr says new proposal is "about as good we can do."


When either side makes statements like this it isn't a good sign.

Optimism holding steady at nil.
  • 1
Hockey is the only sport, the rest are just games.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.