Jump to content

Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Photo
- - - - -

NHL 13 - CDC Sim Connected [PS3 SIM LEAGUE] pt 3


  • Please log in to reply
2948 replies to this topic

Poll: Poll Regarding Player Rental Trades (16 member(s) have cast votes)

Do you want to allow trades for renting players?

  1. Yes. (5 votes [31.25%])

    Percentage of vote: 31.25%

  2. No. (11 votes [68.75%])

    Percentage of vote: 68.75%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#631 Tangelos

Tangelos

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,042 posts
  • Joined: 16-April 12

Posted 05 November 2012 - 11:44 PM

Brendan Gallagher for sale 74 OVR already 87 Def Awareness. Going to break out in a year or 2. Looking for 83 OVR d-man (at least) on good contract (less than 5M)

Edited by Doug The Thug Glatt, 05 November 2012 - 11:45 PM.

  • 0
Posted Image

Previously:
6OH!4, Doug The Thug Glatt

#632 mpt

mpt

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,448 posts
  • Joined: 08-November 03

Posted 05 November 2012 - 11:46 PM

Juuso Ikonen is the property of the Rangers, whomever wins his contract must trade him or someone equivalent to the Rangers (if the contract is ridiculous). Please be forewarned.
  • 0

#633 Danthecanucksfan

Danthecanucksfan

    Canucks Second-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,306 posts
  • Joined: 08-January 12

Posted 05 November 2012 - 11:53 PM

Brendan Gallagher for sale 74 OVR already 87 Def Awareness. Going to break out in a year or 2. Looking for 83 OVR d-man (at least) on good contract (less than 5M)


What's his potential
  • 0

#634 Tangelos

Tangelos

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,042 posts
  • Joined: 16-April 12

Posted 05 November 2012 - 11:55 PM

What's his potential


3.5 Gold.

Also Gallagher may just be part of the deal depending on the d-man. Other pieces can be added. It's all negotiable.

Edited by Doug The Thug Glatt, 05 November 2012 - 11:59 PM.

  • 0
Posted Image

Previously:
6OH!4, Doug The Thug Glatt

#635 Tangelos

Tangelos

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,042 posts
  • Joined: 16-April 12

Posted 06 November 2012 - 12:26 AM

Hey quick question did we implement the rule I suggested that players asking for a 2 way contract cannot be offered a 1 way contract. This is to avoid what happened with Edmonton and how they spent 9M on that one Swedish dude.
  • 0
Posted Image

Previously:
6OH!4, Doug The Thug Glatt

#636 mpt

mpt

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,448 posts
  • Joined: 08-November 03

Posted 06 November 2012 - 12:34 AM

Im not sure, did we?

The not being able to offer 4 star and higher players or over 82 overall 1 year deals fixed that Edmonton fiasco too.

What did we decide about 2-way contracts. I'm sure someone already offered a 2-way player a 1-way deal.

I would think if we all offered the 2-way player a 2-way contract, it would be interesting to see how the player picks what team
  • 0

#637 Tangelos

Tangelos

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,042 posts
  • Joined: 16-April 12

Posted 06 November 2012 - 12:42 AM

Well if a player is initially asking for a 2 way deal you can't give him more money than .925M. If you change the deal to a 1 way you can give him as much as you want. I think if every team can only offer say .925M for 3 yrs to a UFA prospect for example then we'll get to see the prospect pick the best fit since everyone's offering the same thing.

The reason this is better than your rule is because someone can offer a 4 star prospect 2 years at say 5M and won't have to give him up.
  • 0
Posted Image

Previously:
6OH!4, Doug The Thug Glatt

#638 mpt

mpt

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,448 posts
  • Joined: 08-November 03

Posted 06 November 2012 - 12:47 AM

Yea exactly I just don't know if we made that rule. It does make sense, but with people already bidding I'm sure someone already offered a one way deal. We will consider it for next year, but its probably too late for this season.

Edited by mpt, 06 November 2012 - 12:48 AM.

  • 0

#639 Tangelos

Tangelos

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,042 posts
  • Joined: 16-April 12

Posted 06 November 2012 - 12:49 AM

Cause I suggested that right after that edmonton signing. Guess no one listened. Anyway I played fair. Offered the 2 top UFA prospects the max I could given a 2-way contract.
  • 0
Posted Image

Previously:
6OH!4, Doug The Thug Glatt

#640 mpt

mpt

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,448 posts
  • Joined: 08-November 03

Posted 06 November 2012 - 12:55 AM

We all did discuss it but I don't think it was given enough thought. I don't know if we should make it two way has to be two way, but maybe we could put a cap for two way players of 2 million on a one way, so that some strategy is still involved.

I'm just throwing out an idea.
  • 0

#641 DollarAndADream

DollarAndADream

    Canucks Franchise Player

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,838 posts
  • Joined: 27-March 07

Posted 06 November 2012 - 05:39 AM

I think we're better off making a cap limit for offering 1 way contracts to players asking for 2 way. 2 Million sounds like a good idea. 2 or 3 million?



Also, as the acting WPG GM I've offered trades to GM's as requested by the actual WPG GM.
  • 0

Posted Image
RIP LB/RR - Signature credit to JimLahey


#642 Durl Dixsun

Durl Dixsun

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,243 posts
  • Joined: 02-November 10

Posted 06 November 2012 - 05:52 AM

Was there even a sim? I dont have my 16 mil free agents yet
  • 0

Posted Image


#643 mpt

mpt

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,448 posts
  • Joined: 08-November 03

Posted 06 November 2012 - 10:13 AM

The sim for the end of Day 1 UFA is tonight at 4 am
  • 0

#644 mpt

mpt

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,448 posts
  • Joined: 08-November 03

Posted 06 November 2012 - 10:26 AM

Dallas has dropped out of the league
  • 0

#645 Pure GM

Pure GM

    K-Wing Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 75 posts
  • Joined: 06-September 12

Posted 06 November 2012 - 11:03 AM

Two concerns regarding 2way and 1way contract proposal for Free Agency.

1. Does that not take away from the purpose of free agency - an open market

2. How will new members unlike us GM's who are highly active keep up with this rule if it passes? Though it is fairly simple to grasp, to many moving parts in the league may become somewhat of a deterrent if they feel they are working under th rules of the NHL, but continuously receiving PM's of another side non NHL rule that they didn't know about.

Just my two cents.

Stan H Bowman
PS. I have not tried to sign an FA looking for a 2way to a crazy 1 way. lol
  • 0

#646 Tangelos

Tangelos

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,042 posts
  • Joined: 16-April 12

Posted 06 November 2012 - 11:20 AM

We're trying to keep things realistic. In the real NHL prospects don't have gold stars stamped on their forehead representing their potential. No GM would ever give 9M to an unproven prospect.
  • 0
Posted Image

Previously:
6OH!4, Doug The Thug Glatt

#647 mpt

mpt

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,448 posts
  • Joined: 08-November 03

Posted 06 November 2012 - 11:29 AM

Right but no top prospect would ever be an UFA at 20 years old. So I wouldn't know what real GMs would do to acquire a players rights.

Edited by mpt, 06 November 2012 - 11:30 AM.

  • 0

#648 mpt

mpt

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,448 posts
  • Joined: 08-November 03

Posted 06 November 2012 - 11:31 AM

I think the two way deal rule is a decent one. I don't know if its necessary. Pure GM does have a point about attracting new players. We are having a hard time filling those 4 spots

Edited by mpt, 06 November 2012 - 11:33 AM.

  • 0

#649 Tangelos

Tangelos

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,042 posts
  • Joined: 16-April 12

Posted 06 November 2012 - 11:39 AM

why did Dallas leave?
  • 0
Posted Image

Previously:
6OH!4, Doug The Thug Glatt

#650 mpt

mpt

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,448 posts
  • Joined: 08-November 03

Posted 06 November 2012 - 11:50 AM

Said he is too busy.

Also he resigned no one hence why lots of players in UFA are his
  • 0

#651 phoenixlipinski

phoenixlipinski

    Comets Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 369 posts
  • Joined: 14-September 11

Posted 06 November 2012 - 12:11 PM

The sim for the end of Day 1 UFA is tonight at 4 am

I thought it was at 8pm again tonight. Or does everyone really need over a day to bid on the top free agents?
  • 0

~ NHL 13 BE A GM Connected ~

~ CDC Sim Connected - Detroit Red Wings ~

Posted Image


#652 n00bxQb

n00bxQb

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,917 posts
  • Joined: 05-July 09

Posted 06 November 2012 - 12:12 PM

Said he is too busy.

Also he resigned no one hence why lots of players in UFA are his

How nice of him.

So he cheats his way to a cup by stowing players in the minors and keeping Jamie Benn 2/3 of the season then bails at the worst possible time without notice completely screwing over whoever takes Dallas next.
  • 4

#653 WillyFox

WillyFox

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,144 posts
  • Joined: 19-March 11

Posted 06 November 2012 - 12:36 PM

Lots of interest for Hamilton I'm going to say this right now it's going to take major overpayment to land him.
  • 0
GO Canucks GO

#654 Tangelos

Tangelos

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,042 posts
  • Joined: 16-April 12

Posted 06 November 2012 - 12:56 PM

How nice of him.

So he cheats his way to a cup by stowing players in the minors and keeping Jamie Benn 2/3 of the season then bails at the worst possible time without notice completely screwing over whoever takes Dallas next.


Well I'm pretty sure part of the reason why he had Benn was because Montreal didn't have the game. Not much you can do there. And even if he didn't have Benn he would have had Plekanec who at the time was the same OVR as Benn, so I'd say he had the best team in the league and at the end of the day he won the cup without Benn so I really have no problem with it.
  • 0
Posted Image

Previously:
6OH!4, Doug The Thug Glatt

#655 dchan2579

dchan2579

    Comets Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 109 posts
  • Joined: 05-August 12

Posted 06 November 2012 - 01:27 PM

Well I'm pretty sure part of the reason why he had Benn was because Montreal didn't have the game. Not much you can do there. And even if he didn't have Benn he would have had Plekanec who at the time was the same OVR as Benn, so I'd say he had the best team in the league and at the end of the day he won the cup without Benn so I really have no problem with it.


Actually, I purposely went over to my friend's house to complete my trades even before I got the game; Dallas just didn't accept the trade. So technically, he could've traded Benn (who was top 5 in scoring at the time) much earlier in the season.

Either way, he won the playoffs without Benn.
  • 0

#656 Sup CROW

Sup CROW

    K-Wing Regular

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 48 posts
  • Joined: 09-October 12

Posted 06 November 2012 - 01:31 PM

.
  • 0

#657 Sup CROW

Sup CROW

    K-Wing Regular

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 48 posts
  • Joined: 09-October 12

Posted 06 November 2012 - 01:35 PM

/
  • 0

#658 mpt

mpt

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,448 posts
  • Joined: 08-November 03

Posted 06 November 2012 - 01:37 PM

?
  • 0

#659 Sup CROW

Sup CROW

    K-Wing Regular

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 48 posts
  • Joined: 09-October 12

Posted 06 November 2012 - 01:38 PM

.
  • 0

#660 mpt

mpt

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,448 posts
  • Joined: 08-November 03

Posted 06 November 2012 - 02:29 PM

Why are you trolling?
  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.