uber_pwnzor Posted November 8, 2012 Share Posted November 8, 2012 Yes that is exactly what I am saying. Gretzky owns most of the records in the NHL and what he doesn't own, Lemieux does, so ya there would be no Art Ross for Bure/ Mogilny or the Sedins or anyone else. I also don't think that the Sedin's would be as dominant if they played back when Gretzky and Lemieux played. The game was a lot rougher back then and intimidation and reprisal was a huge part of they game. The rules didn't allow for as much open ice as players enjoy in today's game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lowest common denominator Posted November 10, 2012 Share Posted November 10, 2012 Bure Mogilny without doubt. I just feel bad for people that never had a chance to see them play. Nazzy and Bert were more offensively dynamic, but Sedins are more consistent season-to-season, more longevity, and better in the playoffs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James van Riemsdyk Posted November 11, 2012 Share Posted November 11, 2012 Henrik Sedin and Daniel Sedin, twin magic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
susraiders Posted November 11, 2012 Share Posted November 11, 2012 Sedins. They are so unique with their vision and hands that they are by far one of the top 3 duos in the league and the best duo that the Canucks have ever had. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BurnabyJoe Posted November 11, 2012 Share Posted November 11, 2012 Naslund/Bertuzzi not getting enough love the 2 together we're un-****ing-believable Sedin like chemistry with more north/south speed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lowest common denominator Posted November 11, 2012 Share Posted November 11, 2012 So... you would take one 90-100 point player over two 90-100 players? Okay... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.