Jump to content

Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Photo
- - - - -

NHL.com's Five Questions: Gillis talks Bure, life as agent, GM


  • Please log in to reply
15 replies to this topic

#1 Strombone1

Strombone1

    GDT Master

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,445 posts
  • Joined: 06-November 11

Posted 11 November 2012 - 08:15 PM

NHL.com will periodically be doing a series called "Five Questions With …," a Q&A with some of the key movers and shakers in the game today aimed to gain some insight into their lives and careers.
This edition features Vancouver Canucks general manager Mike Gillis:

Instead of going to Toronto for the Hockey Hall of Fame celebration Monday night, Mike Gillis will be in Trinidad watching his daughter, Kate, play for the Canadian national women's field hockey team.
It's a trip any father wouldn't miss provided he could afford to get there, so there's no way anybody can argue with Gillis for choosing to go along for the ride with his athletic daughter.

However, Gillis knows better than most how important this Hall of Fame weekend and the inductions Monday night are to at least one of the inductees.
In Gillis' former life as a player agent, Pavel Bure was one of his most high-profile clients.
Gillis represented Bure from 1997 through the end of his injury-shortened career. He helped Bure through the ups and downs of a 51-goal season in Vancouver, a holdout that led to his trade to Florida and the knee injuries that derailed his career once he got to New York.
Bure finished with 437 goals and 779 points in 702 career NHL games.
"My thoughts about him going into the Hall are he absolutely deserves to be in the Hall of Fame," Gillis told NHL.com. "I thought he was probably the most exciting, best goal scorer in the years he played in the NHL. He's a terrific guy, was a great client and he was a pleasure to work with. We had a lot of fun together."
Now Gillis is four years into his new life as the general manager in Vancouver -- and he is having just as much fun as he used to have as an agent.

Gillis put together training tactics that helped the Canucks have the best road record in the Western Conference last season. He's kept a core of stars in tact by signing several to long-term, lucrative contracts. The Canucks reached Game 7 of the Stanley Cup Final in 2011 only to lose at home to Boston. They've won the Presidents' Trophy in each of the last two seasons.
Read on for some of Gillis' thoughts on Bure, his transition from agent to GM and his future.
Here are Five Questions With… Mike Gillis:

With Pavel Bure going into the Hall of Fame, are the Canucks planning to honor him in anyway, be it a jersey retirement or something else?

"I can't reveal anything, but there are three jerseys that are in the rafters at Rogers Arena and there is a committee that we have that is completely independent of the team that makes the decisions about that and the Ring of Honor. There is obviously plenty of discussion about Pavel and how to effectively honor him within that context. It's ongoing. I can't reveal anything more on that, but he deserves to be honored in some form. It's just a question of what and that will be left up to the committee."

When you left being an agent to become a GM, what was the most difficult challenge you faced in leaving one field to go to the other?

"It was a difficult decision all around. I had really good clients, guys that I was friends with for a long time and represented for a long time that I had to leave and assist them in getting representation from others. I think that was the most difficult thing. I represented Markus Naslund for a long time and went into a situation in Vancouver when he was contemplating the end of his career and there were some very difficult decisions that had to be made on both sides. I found that very challenging."

When negotiating a deal now, as a former agent accustomed to what the other side thinks and does, do you have an advantage or simply just a way of understanding the other side that is different than most?

"Yeah, I think we have an opportunity to look at things a little differently. The way I've set up the organization is one that allows us to capitalize on my experience as an agent to understand what the player is trying to get to and why they're trying to get there. It also allows me the opportunity to realize that if a player is in Vancouver for the wrong reasons we can make that evaluation and adjust accordingly, but if the player is there for all the right reasons we have the chance to reward him and make sure that he's well taken care of. It gives a little bit of a different perspective, which is helpful."

You've put a lot of things in place, various techniques for players with psychologists, therapists, diets, etc., but the thing that jumps out at me is the sleep doctors/experts that you use. Can you explain the philosophy on why you chose to use them and how it all came about, because now it seems like it is getting some traction around the League, too?

"When I took this job we did a real thorough review of everything -- travel, the geography, how we traveled, how to get players rested. We looked at the number of man-games lost and we put together a plan. Sleep therapy and analysis is just one element of the plan that would try and keep our players as fresh as possible and reduce our man-games lost to injuries and hopefully prolong their careers. We've taken a number of steps further in that direction in a number of different areas. I'm not going to go into detail because I think it does give us a competitive advantage and allows us to level the playing field a little bit because of the travel, but I'm firmly convinced that as an organization we can be leaders in human performance as long as we have players that are amenable and want to get better all the time.

"We have a unique opportunity because our owners are completely supportive both financially and emotionally in these kinds of initiatives, so we're very fortunate. We have owners prepared to support it, players prepared to support it and we're actively out there developing personnel for the team that will carry through.

"It's a lot of fun for me. I've thought about it a lot over the years and I think we have an opportunity to really do some strong and aggressive things with respect to human performance that maybe haven't been thought of yet. The players bought into it and we've had the best road record in the National Hockey League in the last year. They are seeing results and when they get results they're happy. They fall into line pretty quickly when you can show them it's effective."

Of course, lockout or no lockout, fans want to know about your unique goaltending situation. How do you view what is in front of you -- is it an opportunity for the organization or strictly business?

"Well, I look at it in multiple ways. I really like Roberto [Luongo]. I like him as a person. I like him as a goaltender. He's a phenomenal guy, a phenomenally hard-working player, zero maintenance. He is the kind of guy that any team would like to have. If we're going to make a transaction, do anything, it's going to be done so we can improve our team in other ways.

"When you take an All-Star player off your team, you have to do that with a lot of faith that you're improving in different areas. And, you know, I don't see that big of an issue if Roberto is with us. I don't see that as an issue at all. I think he's a true professional and I know he and Cory [Schneider] have a great relationship. You know, that may end up being the plan depending on when we get started. I think they would both be fine with it. We're going to do what is best for our hockey team. We're going to make sure we're in the best position to win the Stanley Cup and that may be with both goaltenders."

http://www.nhl.com/i...vid=DL|NHL|home

Edited by Strombone1, 11 November 2012 - 08:24 PM.

  • 0

 Commissioner of 2014-2015 Shapheat Fantasy Hockey League

Player of the Game - Wall of Fame
2014-15 GDT Registrations


#2 Strombone1

Strombone1

    GDT Master

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,445 posts
  • Joined: 06-November 11

Posted 11 November 2012 - 08:22 PM

I found this comment interesting:

It also allows me the opportunity to realize that if a player is in Vancouver for the wrong reasons we can make that evaluation and adjust accordingly, but if the player is there for all the right reasons we have the chance to reward him and make sure that he's well taken care of.


makes you wonder about all the players that weren't signed or traded the past couple of seasons. Rome, Raffi, CoHo, Ehrhoff, SALO?!?
  • 0

 Commissioner of 2014-2015 Shapheat Fantasy Hockey League

Player of the Game - Wall of Fame
2014-15 GDT Registrations


#3 DeNiro

DeNiro

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,756 posts
  • Joined: 22-April 08

Posted 11 November 2012 - 08:32 PM

If Gillis wasn't a GM I think he would make a good politician. Lots of canned answers from him.

So there's a committee that decides whether jersey's are retired or not? I wonder who's on it. I would assume it would be alumni players, probably Linden and Smyl. Maybe even Naslund now.
  • 0

Posted Image


"Dream until the dream come true"


#4 CanucksSayEh

CanucksSayEh

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,325 posts
  • Joined: 07-March 12

Posted 11 November 2012 - 09:02 PM

I found this comment interesting:



makes you wonder about all the players that weren't signed or traded the past couple of seasons. Rome, Raffi, CoHo, Ehrhoff, SALO?!?


On the other hand it can sound like a cop out, diverting blame towards the players when he makes the wrong personnel decisions.
  • 0

#5 ccc44

ccc44

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,423 posts
  • Joined: 29-April 09

Posted 11 November 2012 - 09:04 PM

If Gillis wasn't a GM I think he would make a good politician. Lots of canned answers from him.

So there's a committee that decides whether jersey's are retired or not? I wonder who's on it. I would assume it would be alumni players, probably Linden and Smyl. Maybe even Naslund now.

Sounds more like he might just be passing the buck instead of the potential backlash he might receive for not honouring Bure
  • 0
Posted Image
SHOTS ! SHOTS ! SHOTS !

#6 winacup

winacup

    Comets Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 241 posts
  • Joined: 14-July 12

Posted 11 November 2012 - 09:16 PM

our claim to fame, reaching game 7 and losing at home to Boston
  • 0
Posted Image

#7 Opmac

Opmac

    Canucks Franchise Player

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,524 posts
  • Joined: 09-December 07

Posted 11 November 2012 - 10:47 PM

If Gillis wasn't a GM I think he would make a good politician. Lots of canned answers from him.

So there's a committee that decides whether jersey's are retired or not? I wonder who's on it. I would assume it would be alumni players, probably Linden and Smyl. Maybe even Naslund now.

Three confirmed names: Stan Smyl, Jim Robosn, and Norm Jewison.

Ring of Honour candidates are selected by an advisory committee including former player and current Senior Advisor to the General Manager, Stan Smyl, Hockey Hall of Fame broadcaster, Jim Robson and former Canucks staff member of over 30 years, Norm Jewison.


http://canucks.nhl.c...s.htm?id=548423
  • 0

Posted Image


#8 DeNiro

DeNiro

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,756 posts
  • Joined: 22-April 08

Posted 11 November 2012 - 10:49 PM

Three confirmed names: Stan Smyl, Jim Robosn, and Norm Jewison.



http://canucks.nhl.c...s.htm?id=548423


Robson and Smyl loved Bure. Robson especially.

If those three are in charge of the selection, Bure's number is getting retired for sure.
  • 0

Posted Image


"Dream until the dream come true"


#9 elvis15

elvis15

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 20,552 posts
  • Joined: 27-February 07

Posted 11 November 2012 - 11:12 PM

I found this comment interesting:

makes you wonder about all the players that weren't signed or traded the past couple of seasons. Rome, Raffi, CoHo, Ehrhoff, SALO?!?

Raffi and Hodgson, I'd say yes. Ehrhoff and Salo were contract related which does have it's part in that statement but I don't think their's was so much a character issue. Rome is just a depth guy who is coming up to being ready to be replaced by our prospects so it was a battle between Ballard, Alberts and he for the last few spots, and Rome was the one whose contract was up.

On the other hand it can sound like a cop out, diverting blame towards the players when he makes the wrong personnel decisions.

Sounds more like he might just be passing the buck instead of the potential backlash he might receive for not honouring Bure

Wow, glad to see you both are glass-is-more-like-7/8ths-empty-rather-than-half-full kind of people.
  • 1

c3c9e9.pnganimalhousesig.jpg

Tanev is going to EDM. I can put my life savings down on it

 


#10 playboi19

playboi19

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 20,333 posts
  • Joined: 15-August 08

Posted 11 November 2012 - 11:29 PM

I found this comment interesting:



makes you wonder about all the players that weren't signed or traded the past couple of seasons. Rome, Raffi, CoHo, Ehrhoff, SALO?!?

Woah! Hold on a second.

Don't you dare lump Aaron Rome in with that group. Aaron was nothing short of a class act. Furthermore, Aaron is an exceptional individual who was let go for one singular reason.

Spread your wings Aaron, fly like an eagle.

Rome4Norris.
  • 1

Subbancopy.jpg


#11 thehamburglar

thehamburglar

    Canucks Second-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,282 posts
  • Joined: 21-April 10

Posted 12 November 2012 - 12:11 AM

Nothing really revealed. Luongo should stay.
  • 0
Posted Image

#12 Burrdin

Burrdin

    K-Wing Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 54 posts
  • Joined: 30-June 11

Posted 12 November 2012 - 08:00 AM

I found this comment interesting:



makes you wonder about all the players that weren't signed or traded the past couple of seasons. Rome, Raffi, CoHo, Ehrhoff, SALO?!?


I'm in agreement with others here that said Ehrhoff and Salo were looking for too much(probably total dollars for Ehrhoff and total years for Salo), Rome was not too expensive, but probably a little too much for the 7/8th defenseman, and they would most likely want to start playing some prospects a bit more.

I think its entirely possible both Hodgson and Torres fit in the other category of not being totally committed to the team. It didn't seem (to me anyways) that Torres really fit in here. He gave the team something it needed, but it didn't feel like he became someone the dressing room respected.

I think everyone knows the Hodgson story by now. I don't really have anything new to say about it.
  • 0

#13 Boudrias

Boudrias

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,113 posts
  • Joined: 14-January 04

Posted 12 November 2012 - 08:03 AM

Raffi and Hodgson, I'd say yes. Ehrhoff and Salo were contract related which does have it's part in that statement but I don't think their's was so much a character issue. Rome is just a depth guy who is coming up to being ready to be replaced by our prospects so it was a battle between Ballard, Alberts and he for the last few spots, and Rome was the one whose contract was up.



Wow, glad to see you both are glass-is-more-like-7/8ths-empty-rather-than-half-full kind of people.

Salo: Wanted a multi-year and his age worked against him.
Rome & Torres : Again both wanted a multi-year and was already being paid more than warranted by ice time.
CoHo & Ehrhoff: Who really knows about CoHo but MG's comments suggest personality conflicts; Ehrhoff it seems to me was more into the money than the team. The Canuck's offence off the d-core did not suffer with his leaving but one could argue their breakouts did suffer to date. I also thought Van's defensive coverage in tough physical games suffered with Ehrhoff. I am talking about playoff hockey not regular season.
  • 0

#14 TOMapleLaughs

TOMapleLaughs

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 31,744 posts
  • Joined: 19-September 05

Posted 12 November 2012 - 11:59 AM

If Gillis was a poster on Cdc, i think he'd have a pre-prepped wall of text ready to be posted on every topic under the sun. Including rebuttals. Just in case.

If Gillis wasn't a GM I think he would make a good politician. Lots of canned answers from him.

So there's a committee that decides whether jersey's are retired or not? I wonder who's on it. I would assume it would be alumni players, probably Linden and Smyl. Maybe even Naslund now.


  • 0
Posted Image

#15 nuckin_futz

nuckin_futz

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,226 posts
  • Joined: 09-January 12

Posted 12 November 2012 - 02:53 PM

our claim to fame, reaching game 7 and losing at home to Boston


You're grumpy and miserable, we get it. It's one thing playing Devil's advocate or trying to provide balance to the board but you're like a broken record. "The Canucks suck, wont ever win a thing, soft euro core, celebrate losing".

If that's your opinion, fine but you really need some new material.

Edited by nuckin_futz, 12 November 2012 - 02:56 PM.

  • 0

#16 Kesler's Nose

Kesler's Nose

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 757 posts
  • Joined: 21-February 11

Posted 12 November 2012 - 06:18 PM

MG is like an elf, don't expect to get any straight forward advice out of him. (Yes, I made a Lord of the Rings reference) :bigblush:
  • 0

"It's an opportunity, we don't look at it as a last chance... We look at it as an opportunity to do something great. We are going to take it period by period, shift by shift. You just have to be better than the guy across from you... Every guy in this locker room I can say believes we can do this." - Ryan Kesler

Posted Image





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.