Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

*VaNcOuVeRCaNuCkS*

CDC STHS Hockey League (Season 2)

5,993 posts in this topic

Yeah, looking back on that its pretty well the worst trade we've seen.

If the Suter trade was vetoed this should be too, easily.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lol not at all...?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, looking back on that its pretty well the worst trade we've seen.

If the Suter trade was vetoed this should be too, easily.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Look at his stats. He had a good year for me.

Im comparing them in STHS not IRL

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

True enough, I mean even though Gally was giving up insane players he was getting back an elite player.....this Goligoski trade, swee is getting nothing for that elite player

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

wouldnt call goligoski an elite player, though, swee did get nothing in return for him. Not sure how this one got by the review board.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

wouldnt call goligoski an elite player, though, swee did get nothing in return for him. Not sure how this one got by the review board.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The goligoski trade needs to be veto'd.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

True enough, I mean even though Gally was giving up insane players he was getting back an elite player.....this Goligoski trade, swee is getting nothing for that elite player

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

High potentials but shjtty everything else :lol:

Plus, don't the re-rates consider real-life performances as well? I doubt either of them will get a bigger re-rate than Goligoski himself

Just sayin'

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

High potentials but shjtty everything else :lol:

Plus, don't the re-rates consider real-life performances as well? I doubt either of them will get a bigger re-rate than Goligoski himself

Just sayin'

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it's unfair to say "swee did get nothing in return".

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like how sweefish has yet to come and justify this move.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking to make some move's, looking to upgrade on D especially.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I may not be positive, but I think that "Elite Player" Nathan MacKinnon is talking about is Ryan Suter in his old vetoed trade.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree that the Suter deal is not in the same league, the Suter deal was very lopsided however I feel this Goligoski one is too...sure he's gettign 1st rounders but they were from a while ago and it's not that fair IMO

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not even, sundstrom was a late 2nd rounder, Kuhnhackl a 4th

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.