Jump to content

Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Photo

Kids removed from UK couple over support for 'independence' from EU


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
6 replies to this topic

#1 key2thecup

key2thecup

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,115 posts
  • Joined: 28-November 07

Posted 24 November 2012 - 03:27 PM

Kids removed from UK couple over support for 'independence' from Europe



LONDON -- Three children were removed from the care of an English couple because their support for the U.K. Independence Party meant they were unsuitable to provide foster care, an official said Saturday.

Local government body Rotherham Council said that the three children were not “indigenous white British” and that social workers had raised concerns about the UKIP political party’s stance on immigration, ITV News reported.

Joyce Thacker, the director for children and young people's services at Rotherham Council, told BBC News that the children were placed with the couple on an emergency basis and were not due to remain with them permanently. She confirmed they had been removed from the couple's care.

“If the party [UKIP] mantra … is ending the active promotion of multiculturalism, I have to think about that,” she added. “I think they [UKIP] have very clear views on immigration.”
She told the BBC that the decision had not been “easy” and she did not think UKIP was a “racist party.”

'Ruled by this regime'
UKIP campaigns for Britain to withdraw from the European Union, saying "we do not have to be ruled by this regime" in order to trade with European countries.

On immigration, it says "the tide of mass EU immigration has pushed down wages and restricted job opportunities. Only by leaving the EU can we regain control of our borders." The party is calling for a permanent immigration freeze for 5 years and says immigrants "must be fluent in English, have minimum education levels and show they can financially support themselves."

UKIP party leader Nigel Farage said in messages on Twitter that the authorities “clearly have no understanding of UKIP and by their actions, clearly no desire to know.”

He said the council was “partially backtracking” by saying the couple would still be allowed “to adopt. But by the sounds of it, only white children. New Apardheid? [sic]”

The British Education Secretary Michael Gove, a member of the center-right Conservative Party, also attacked the decision, ITV News reported.

“Rotherham's reasons for denying this family the chance to foster are indefensible. The ideology behind their decision is actively harmful to children,” he said.

“We should not allow considerations of ethnic or cultural background to prevent children being placed with loving and stable families. We need more parents to foster, and many more to adopt,” he added.

The center-left Labour Party said in a message on Twitter that “Membership of UKIP shouldn't block parents from adopting children. There needs to be an urgent investigation by Rotherham Council into this.”

http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/11/24/15407064-kids-removed-from-uk-couple-over-support-for-independence-from-europe#.ULDPkJ3QLgY.facebook


Dr. Ron Paul 2016!


#2 key2thecup

key2thecup

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,115 posts
  • Joined: 28-November 07

Posted 24 November 2012 - 03:39 PM


Dr. Ron Paul 2016!


#3 Harbinger

Harbinger

    Canucks Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,198 posts
  • Joined: 12-October 05

Posted 24 November 2012 - 04:04 PM

Not really a bad idea when the children are from elsewhere and their political beliefs are against such children.

Posted Image


#4 key2thecup

key2thecup

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,115 posts
  • Joined: 28-November 07

Posted 24 November 2012 - 04:54 PM

Not really a bad idea when the children are from elsewhere and their political beliefs are against such children.


Not supporting the EU doesn't mean they are racist and against immigration.

Dr. Ron Paul 2016!


#5 Harbinger

Harbinger

    Canucks Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,198 posts
  • Joined: 12-October 05

Posted 24 November 2012 - 05:01 PM

Not supporting the EU doesn't mean they are racist and against immigration.


You can't look at the not supporting the EU part and leave it at that. You have to look at the bigger picture which the lady did. In the same breath it also has to be said that the home was not to be a permanent abode. It was temporary. Since that is the case. Then even more precautions should be taken to be sure the children are in an acceptable environment. Who and what you support are extremely important in understanding what you believe and how you would treat people. Better safe then sorry must always be the mantra for protecting children.

“If the party [UKIP] mantra … is ending the active promotion of multiculturalism, I have to think about that,” she added. “I think they [UKIP] have very clear views on immigration.”

Posted Image


#6 Lancaster

Lancaster

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,955 posts
  • Joined: 03-September 12

Posted 24 November 2012 - 05:35 PM

They're not the KKK trying to adopt kids here. It's pretty much the UK version of the PQ.
Easily disagreeable, but still within the realm of discussion in an open democracy.

This is just another example of the state trampling over the rights of the people.

#7 VICanucksfan5551

VICanucksfan5551

    Canucks Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,583 posts
  • Joined: 11-August 04

Posted 24 November 2012 - 06:44 PM

The title is disingenuous. The issue isn't that the party opposes the EU, it's that the party is xenophobic.

Edited by VICanucksfan5551, 24 November 2012 - 06:44 PM.

Posted Image
Posted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted Image




Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.