canuktravella Posted December 4, 2012 Share Posted December 4, 2012 heres my proposal 1st trade- capitals dmitri orlov for janick hansen solid 2way 3rd pair dman 19 points last yr in 60 games due to call up due to injuries. have to give sonethng to get a good player. 2nd trade- stars jamie benn 2nd round pick for alex edler. edler will be a ufa next yr unless we resign him. plus he has a bad back. this ones risky does it seem like a fair trade or would we want more for him? the way i look at one of either ballard or edlers will be gone. we as a team have to many four million dmen ones gotta give bieska 4.6 hamhuis 4.5 ballard 4.2 garrison 4.6 edler could get 7 mill in offseason or more specially with wings and flyers drooling over any big name ufa dman. 3rd trade- bobby luo for tyler bozak karl gunnarson 2nd rounder do you think thats fair or would you want leafs first round pick instead of 2nd?? 4th trade raymond for a bag of bbq dorito chips or give him a one way ticket to siberia. sign a free agent 4th liner thats gritty any ideas let me know. new lines would look like this .... sedin sedin burrows - old steady line benn kesler booth - this line would be fast and score bunches kassian bozak higgins - hard working 3rd manny lapps freeagent - shutdown line bieska hamhuis solid first pair ballard garrison scores and defensive orlov gunnarson cheaper third pair responsible alberts tanev connauton corrado fight for spots next yr schneider backup plug or lack good or bad ?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
73 Percent Posted December 4, 2012 Share Posted December 4, 2012 I like orlov for Hansen. slight underpayment on our part I think. the only way I'd ever trade edger was if we got a grade a defensive prospect back like orlov so that works. stop trying to trade for benn. he is untouchable. Dallas is building around him. love the raymond trade. the lu trade is fair...just not a fan of gunnarson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
73 Percent Posted December 4, 2012 Share Posted December 4, 2012 definitely not the worst proposal I've seen. Lu trade is realistic. hansen trade is close. Raymond trade is spot on. and it's OK to have a hard on for benn. I do along with half if CDC. we should start a support group. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuktravella Posted December 4, 2012 Author Share Posted December 4, 2012 thanks guys first proposal no ones trolled me haha i only would trade edler if he isnt gonna sign long term but if he does then ballard would need to go but since av has killed his worth its not worth trading him i sure hope gillis fixes this. Oh ya orlovs awesome wishful thinking in three yrs hamhuis corrado garrison connauton orlov sauve would be good i hope this yr sauve gets a shot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted December 4, 2012 Share Posted December 4, 2012 Not bad, but not great either. Getting better though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuktravella Posted December 4, 2012 Author Share Posted December 4, 2012 ok if its ok lets hear u make 4 trades that are better. not unrealistic and moves that shake the core up a bit getting younger id love to hear if you come up with anything better Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aladeen Posted December 4, 2012 Share Posted December 4, 2012 Logged in just to respond to this crap 1. We will NEVER get back in return for trading Hansen the value and work ethic he brings to the table. 2. You are dreaming to think that the Stars would ever Trade Benn. If they were to Kesler would be a starting point. 3. If leafs don't pony up a 1st ++ I don't think MG should do it --> that is just my opinion though. 4. Hmm let Raymond go for nothing or take a zero risk (consider the canucks already have him) potential high reward (should he have a bounce back year) - As unlikely as it is for him to become a solid top-6 player, some chance is better than just cutting him and ending up with a cap hit anyways. If this is your first proposal I hope it is your last. Very weak use some common sense! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil_314 Posted December 4, 2012 Share Posted December 4, 2012 From Vancouver's perspective it's not bad and I would do these trades; I'm not sure Hansen has the value to get Orlov, plus the back end might not have enough scoring for my liking Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
73 Percent Posted December 4, 2012 Share Posted December 4, 2012 Logged in just to respond to this crap 1. We will NEVER get back in return for trading Hansen the value and work ethic he brings to the table. 2. You are dreaming to think that the Stars would ever Trade Benn. If they were to Kesler would be a starting point. 3. If leafs don't pony up a 1st ++ I don't think MG should do it --> that is just my opinion though. 4. Hmm let Raymond go for nothing or take a zero risk (consider the canucks already have him) potential high reward (should he have a bounce back year) - As unlikely as it is for him to become a solid top-6 player, some chance is better than just cutting him and ending up with a cap hit anyways. If this is your first proposal I hope it is your last. Very weak use some common sense! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dogbyte Posted December 4, 2012 Share Posted December 4, 2012 Don't mind the first one. Benn is far more valuable then UFA Edler. Don't like Bozak as a return, barely, if a hockey player on a real NHL team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aladeen Posted December 4, 2012 Share Posted December 4, 2012 lay off man it's not terrible. far from the worst we've seen on cdc. and you know when you consider hansen an untouchable you overvalue our players. although he has truck loads of heart and work ethic he is far far from an offensive Juggernaut. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gretzky's Mullet Posted December 4, 2012 Share Posted December 4, 2012 With a trade proposal, you need a "why do it?" rationale (as opposed to just "why not?") and you need the trades to be realistic. As has been said, the only significant improvement amongst these moves is the acquisition of Benn, and Dallas isn't trading him, least of all for a UFA-to-be. The Lu trade is pretty unoriginal, and the other ones don't seem to have much of a point save for "shaking up the team", which I strongly doubt Gillis is seeking to do. Not a downright awful proposal, but not really exciting either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red-Haired_Shanks Posted December 4, 2012 Share Posted December 4, 2012 can you spell correctly please? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monty Posted December 4, 2012 Share Posted December 4, 2012 can you spell correctly please? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dancin'Droid Posted December 4, 2012 Share Posted December 4, 2012 Getting rid of Raymond for zero return unless cap space is truly needed DOES NOT make the Canucks better Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
73 Percent Posted December 4, 2012 Share Posted December 4, 2012 Raymond is getting a return, a bag of doritos Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
logic Posted December 4, 2012 Share Posted December 4, 2012 Just a tip, people will take you way more seriously if you use proper spelling, punctuation, and grammar. And the joke about Raymond wasn't funny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jägermeister Posted December 4, 2012 Share Posted December 4, 2012 The Caps would never go for it. They have a plethora of gritty wingers, and Orlov has the potential to be a solid top 4 D. Dallas would also not go for it. Benn is the future of their team. Not a fan of Bozak, so I wouldn't do the TO trade. I would want one of their high end prospects in return. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted December 4, 2012 Share Posted December 4, 2012 How does this sound hockey trade-wise? To Montreal: Jamie Benn To Dallas: PK Subban May not happen but I think its alright in value. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monty Posted December 4, 2012 Share Posted December 4, 2012 How does this sound hockey trade-wise? To Montreal: Jamie Benn To Dallas: PK Subban May not happen but I think its alright in value. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.