Smashian Kassian Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 Cox is an idiot. I consider his opinion at par with Pierre Mcguire's'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smashian Kassian Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 Usually disagree with Botchford, but these 4 tweets of his (Aswell as his argument with Cox) Were right on the money. Jason Botchford @botchford So, the Canucks should wheel Luongo over in a wheelbarrow, drop him off at the ACC, grab a 3rd rnd pick and go home? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 The Toronto media have been trying for awhile to boost up the value of Kadri. The truth is the Leafs gave up on him being a star player a long time ago. Now they're trying to salvage what they can for him. He adds less value to a trade at this point since he is 22 years old and still pretty unproven. Would I be happy to get him though? Sure, but not as the center piece of the trade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legend Killer Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 Kadri apparently feels prisoned by the Leafs, that's according to a friend of his i know. He's got skill, but the Leafs have to get rid of him. He wants out, so his value is down for them in a trade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nox Posted January 17, 2013 Share Posted January 17, 2013 On rumour board it mentions Mike Gillis saying he's spoken to 4 or 5 teams about Luongo trade this week. Sounds like MG is trying to push someone to move one step closer to close a trade. Likely Nonis or Tallon. I read this as a trade is going to happen one way or the other by Saturday. No way Canucks want Luongo staying with them at this point unless there's absolutely no alternative. Com'on let's get this trade done and see some hot new names in the lineup come Saturday. Make it worth my time to line up an hour for a $1 hot dog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Onions Posted January 17, 2013 Share Posted January 17, 2013 I don't think TO is in the position to offer us a whole lot. I mean, look at who we would want and what that would do to their current team. Sure they can offer prospects and picks but that just hurts them in the future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted January 17, 2013 Share Posted January 17, 2013 If the Canucks don't make a trade in the next couple days, look for us to sign Arnott or Gomez. I think that will signal that Luongo is staying here for the season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nox Posted January 17, 2013 Share Posted January 17, 2013 I don't think TO is in the position to offer us a whole lot. I mean, look at who we would want and what that would do to their current team. Sure they can offer prospects and picks but that just hurts them in the future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canuck Surfer Posted January 17, 2013 Share Posted January 17, 2013 Well Burke got fired two days in or so didn't he? Before the trade moratorium was off... if Luongo to Florida was as good as done- why has it not happened? John Shannon and half the hockey world predicted that Luongo to Toronto would happen within 48 hours of the lockout ending. How about 48 days? 48 weeks? John Shannon really F'ed his reputation with his guarantee of Luongo to Toronto- oh wait, he has no reputation, because nobody cares what he says anyway, because we all know that he is a useless human being. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Millerdraft Posted January 17, 2013 Share Posted January 17, 2013 If the Canucks don't make a trade in the next couple days, look for us to sign Arnott or Gomez. I think that will signal that Luongo is staying here for the season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted January 17, 2013 Share Posted January 17, 2013 Remember two big media companies run the show in Toronto now. Win or lose adding a big name like Luongo might help the bottomline of both companies. The bosses there are no longer just hockey people growing a franchise from the grassroots. What do they say in showbiz, there's no such thing as bad publicity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Niklas Jensen Posted January 17, 2013 Share Posted January 17, 2013 Luongo to Florida please, love to see the Leafs end up with nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theminister Posted January 17, 2013 Share Posted January 17, 2013 I've got a creeping feeling that this deal keeps getting bigger and bigger. I'm officially expecting the unexpected at this point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted January 17, 2013 Share Posted January 17, 2013 I've got a creeping feeling that this deal keeps getting bigger and bigger. I'm officially expecting the unexpected at this point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theminister Posted January 17, 2013 Share Posted January 17, 2013 Yea me too. I could see players like Raymond and even Tanev being included as part of a bigger package for Bozak, Gardiner, and Kadri. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elvis15 Posted January 17, 2013 Share Posted January 17, 2013 I'm thinking even bigger. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted January 17, 2013 Share Posted January 17, 2013 Luongo to Florida please, love to see the Leafs end up with nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted January 17, 2013 Share Posted January 17, 2013 I've got a creeping feeling that this deal keeps getting bigger and bigger. I'm officially expecting the unexpected at this point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WHL rocks Posted January 17, 2013 Share Posted January 17, 2013 I'm thinking even bigger. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldnews Posted January 17, 2013 Share Posted January 17, 2013 Of course, you're only telling the part of the story that serves your argument. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.