• Announcements

    • StealthNuck

      Forum-specific Rules   07/11/2017

      These are board specific rules for the Trades and Rumors forum designed to provide organization and a better experience for everyone. Please review these rules before posting new threads. 
        THREAD ETIQUETTE   1. Please search for an existing thread before posting. This forum can be very fast moving, so it's understandable if redundant threads are inadvertently posted. In such a case, please use the report feature to request removal of redundant threads.    2. Provide a clearly identifiable topic title so that users can readily understand the content. The title should include any and all teams involved, as well as player names or other personnel involved as appropriate.   3. All trades, signings, rumors and other news MUST include a linkable source. Simply posting the name of the source is not enough. Effort should also be made to copy and paste the full article, or at the very least the relevant portion of text from the source to the first post of the thread. Moderators may remove low-quality threads in favour of high-quality threads. 

      Affixed to the front of your title should be a label that identifies the type of transaction that is taking place. For all trades use [TRADE]. For all signings use [SIGNING]. For all waiver-wire transactions use [WAIVERS]. For all rumours use [RUMOUR].
      For articles or news items that don't fit into the above categories, affix an appropriate label of your choice such as [NEWS], [ARTICLE] or [MISC].   4. When the status of a thread changes a new thread can be created. The new thread should reflect the change and help focus the discussion on current events. e.g. Someone may create a new thread when a rumor becomes a trades. The old thread will be locked by the moderating team.    5. Do not misrepresent the contents of your thread or post false trades or rumors. Trolling will result in a permanent suspension. 

      SOURCES   The following source types are considered INVALID. Any links to posts or threads on other message boards Any links to personal blogs Any news heard on the radio that does not have a link to an audio vault or podcast Any news seen on television that does not have a link to online video Any news spread by word of mouth
      Additionally, certain sources may be be blacklisted due to poor credentials, clear traffic-mongering etc. Blacklisted sources will be posted here. 
      Thank you for your co-operation and please PM the Administrator or Moderators if you have any questions, concerns or suggestions regarding this forum.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Templeton Peck

[Discussion] Roberto Luongo Trade Thread 4.0

Recommended Posts

adater ‏@adater

Quote:

Just heard what everyone else heard: Flyers are now players in Luongo hunt. #gameon

james duthie‏@tsnjamesduthie

Despite some denials, the tweet earlier from @EnricoCiccone is accurate. The Flyers are interested in Roberto Luongo.

That makes Toronto, Tampa, Florida, Edmonton, Chicago, Boston (if you believe Eklund) and now Philly as all in for Luongo. Courtier and Coburn for Luongo!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Who do you guys think we could get from Philly? Obviously Couturier would be sick but I doubt Philly would move him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

:lol: Haha and you have proven your intelligence by using your post to insult me rather than actually address my points with more of your terrible logic.

Nice one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

james duthie@tsnjamesduthie

Doesn't mean they are going to get him. Doesn't necessarily mean they'll make an offer. But they've inquired. Could buy out Bryz in June.

Makes the glasses seem more less half full now, if they buyout Bryz in june then let's look at it long and hard and see what they are willing to give, but right now I don't see it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One thing I like about Philly being involved is that Paul Holmgren doesn't screw around. If he wants to get Luongo, he will get Luongo.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would take the Kadri deal over the Bozak deal.

Kadri can play on the 2nd until Kes returns, and Bozak isn't really much of an improvement on Lappierre in my opinon, it's not worth taking him over the great value and future value Kadri brings.

Personally if we are going for a Rental from the leafs I would much rather McArthur than Bozak (Yes Clarke can play RW), We have a few guys capable of playing in the third line role (Lappy, Manny, maybe even JS), but no one is proven that they can fill the 2nd RW spot aside from maybe Higgins who fits alot better on the 3rd.

Just for this example I'll use Lappy in the 3C spot.

I Would much rather:

Booth - Kesler - McArthur

Higgins - Lappierre - Hansen

Than:

Booth - Kesler - Higgins

Raymond - Bozak - Hansen

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You guys think Bozak and Gardiner would be better than Kadri and Gardiner for the present?

We aren't getting a 1st on top of either of those 2 proposals so stop with the + 1st stuff, please.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

YOU ARE THE DUMBEST HUMAN BEING ALIVE - WHERE DID I SAY HE COULD BE THERE NUMBER 1? PLEASE PROVIDE THE QUOTE

IDIOT

I SHOWED YOU HOW FLAWED YOUR LOGIC IS AND YOU RESPOND LIKE A RETARDED 5 YR OLD MONKEY WITH TERETS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have provided you with constant logic and you are so in love with your man crush/bromance with Kadri you can't even understand it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If Philly gets interested-which is BEAUTIFUL to hear-dominoes falling may lead to Pittsburgh inquiring. Fleury was simply brutal last spring.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One thing I like about Philly being involved is that Paul Holmgren doesn't screw around. If he wants to get Luongo, he will get Luongo.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If Philly gets interested-which is BEAUTIFUL to hear-dominoes falling may lead to Pittsburgh inquiring. Fleury was simply brutal last spring.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

adater ‏@adater

Quote:

Just heard what everyone else heard: Flyers are now players in Luongo hunt. #gameon

james duthie‏@tsnjamesduthie

Despite some denials, the tweet earlier from @EnricoCiccone is accurate. The Flyers are interested in Roberto Luongo.

That makes Toronto, Tampa, Florida, Edmonton, Chicago, Boston (if you believe Eklund) and now Philly as all in for Luongo. Courtier and Coburn for Luongo!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow a bit of a shock to me, I still think it is unlikely though, the target would be something they don't want to part and I'm not interested in Talbot+ prospect/1st (If they even have any interesting prospects other than Laughton)

Not even all that interested in Talbot we have the same thing in Lappy and aside from that they won't give us Simmonds, Voracek, Couturier, Schenn exc. Then a buyout is much nicer said than done.

It adds some optimism that maybe there is a greater market with more possbilities but I don't see much of a fit myself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

YOU ARE THE DUMBEST HUMAN BEING ALIVE - WHERE DID I SAY HE COULD BE THERE NUMBER 1? PLEASE PROVIDE THE QUOTE

IDIOT

I SHOWED YOU HOW FLAWED YOUR LOGIC IS AND YOU RESPOND LIKE A RETARDED 5 YR OLD MONKEY WITH TERETS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.