Jump to content

Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Photo

Colo. theater shooting kin reject movie invitation


  • Please log in to reply
13 replies to this topic

#1 dudeone

dudeone

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 807 posts
  • Joined: 17-February 04

Posted 03 January 2013 - 07:48 PM

Colo. theater shooting kin reject movie invitation

Relatives of 9 killed in Colorado movie theater reject 'disgusting' invitation to reopening

By Dan Elliott and Colleen Slevin, Associated Press | Associated Press – 10 hrs ago

http://news.yahoo.co...-160917231.html

DENVER (AP) -- Relatives of those killed at a Colorado movie theater rejected an invitation Wednesday to attend its planned reopening, calling it a "disgusting offer" that came at a terrible time — right after the first Christmas without their loved ones.

The parents, grandparents, cousins and widow of nine of the 12 people killed in the July shooting said they were asked to attend an "evening of remembrance" followed by a movie when the Aurora theater reopens on Jan. 17. They released a letter sent to the theater's owner, Cinemark Holdings Inc., in which they criticized the Plano, Texas-based company for not previously reaching out to them to offer condolences and refusing to meet with them without lawyers.

"Our family members will never be on this earth with us again and a movie ticket and some token words from people who didn't care enough to reach out to us, nor respond when we reached out to them to talk, is appalling," the letter said.

Cinemark had no immediate comment.

The company announced last month that it would reopen the theater on Jan. 17 and invite people affected by the attack and other guests, a move that Aurora officials said has strong support in the community. Gov. John Hickenlooper plans to attend.

The Aurora Sentinel reported that plans filed with the city call for turning the theater into one of the company's "extreme digital cinema" sites that feature massive screens. It's not clear from the plans whether there will be a memorial to the victims.

The invitation was emailed to families by the Colorado Organization for Victim Assistance, which said the offer was being sent on behalf of Cinemark.

It arrived two days after Christmas as Sandy and Lonnie Phillips, the mother and stepfather of Jessica Ghawi, one of the 12 people killed, were housesitting in Denver.

They had left their home in San Antonio, Texas, on the advice of their grief counselor to avoid being where they typically would have celebrated Christmas with Jessica. Sandy Phillips said they picked Denver on purpose because her daughter, a 24-year-old aspiring sportscaster, had been happy there.

The Phillipses said the invitation could be a public relations ploy to help show the public that some victims or their families are willing to attend the theater reopening.

"It was a killing field. It was a place of carnage and they've not once told us what their plans are for the theater other than that they're reopening it," said Sandy Phillips. She would like the theater where her daughter was killed to be demolished, though she acknowledged that it was unrealistic to expect Cinemark to give up the rest of the building.

The families of some victims have sued Cinemark. The father of the youngest person killed in the shooting, 6-year-old Veronica Moser-Sullivan, is among them. He didn't sign the letter but the girl's grandparents did. The Phillipses have not decided whether they will sue.

Also Wednesday, prosecutors and defense lawyers said they are ready for a crucial hearing next week in which prosecutors will outline their case against James Holmes, who is charged with killing 12 people and wounding 70 during the midnight showing of the Batman movie "The Dark Knight Rises" on July 20.

It starts Monday and is scheduled to run all week. At its conclusion, state District Judge William B. Sylvester will decide if the evidence is sufficient to put Holmes on trial.

The defense could waive the hearing but legal analysts said defense lawyers sometimes go ahead with the hearing to get an idea of how strong the prosecution's case is.

Laurie Levenson, a professor at Loyola Law School in Los Angeles and a former federal prosecutor, said preliminary hearings sometimes set the stage for a plea agreement as each side gets to assess the strength of the other.

Holmes is charged with multiple counts of first-degree murder and attempted murder and hasn't been asked to enter a plea yet. His lawyers have said he suffers from mental illness.

Next week's hearing will give the public its first officially sanctioned look at much of the evidence against Holmes.

A judge imposed a gag order shortly after Holmes' arrest barring attorneys and investigators from speaking publicly about the case, and many documents have been sealed.

The University of Colorado, where Holmes was enrolled in a Ph. D. neuroscience program, has also been tight-lipped about the case. Investigators said he began stockpiling firearms and ammunition while taking classes in the spring.

In June, he made threats to a professor and on June 10 filed withdrawal papers after failing a year-end exam, prosecutors said. The next day he saw his school psychiatrist who tried to report him to a campus security committee, according to Holmes' lawyers.

Edited by dudeone, 03 January 2013 - 07:50 PM.

  • 0

#2 Armada

Armada

    Canucks Franchise Player

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,987 posts
  • Joined: 03-February 08

Posted 03 January 2013 - 08:04 PM

I applaud the genius who thought of that idea :picard:
  • 0
Posted Image
______________Eat, Sleep,Posted ImageRave, Repeat

#3 :D

:D

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 20,738 posts
  • Joined: 14-August 03

Posted 03 January 2013 - 08:30 PM

If I ran the cinema or was a part of Cinemark Holdings, I wouldn't be meeting with this group without lawyers either.
  • 0

#4 SterlingArcher

SterlingArcher

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 945 posts
  • Joined: 03-August 11

Posted 03 January 2013 - 09:24 PM

I would of taken the free movie. Not the theaters fault some dude showed up with a gun.
  • 0
Posted Image
Posted Image-Mod note: Inappropriate

#5 Jägermeister

Jägermeister

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,667 posts
  • Joined: 24-May 12

Posted 03 January 2013 - 09:26 PM

Somebodies going to get fired... and deservedly so.
  • 0
Posted Image

#6 cadillaccts

cadillaccts

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,557 posts
  • Joined: 10-October 07

Posted 03 January 2013 - 09:41 PM

I can see both sides.

It may give people some form of closure, a reminder that life goes on. It may obviously disturb others. I'm sure the intentions were good here.
  • 0

#7 Dittohead

Dittohead

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,190 posts
  • Joined: 13-August 04

Posted 04 January 2013 - 08:17 AM

Some people who were there are going but that's not interesting news. Some people who lost someone there are going to try and get rich off it. that's disgusting.

Edited by Dittohead, 04 January 2013 - 08:18 AM.

  • 0

#8 TOMapleLaughs

TOMapleLaughs

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 31,940 posts
  • Joined: 19-September 05

Posted 04 January 2013 - 09:27 AM

Only thing worse is if the drug companies offer them a supply of free Vicodin for their pain and suffering.
  • 0
Posted Image

#9 hsedin33

hsedin33

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,662 posts
  • Joined: 14-February 10

Posted 04 January 2013 - 09:35 AM

Although its lame they refused to meet without lawyers, there really wasnt much Cinemark could have done asides from putting armed guards at each one of their exit doors. I wouldn't want to sit in a theatre where there was a mass murder, it would just feel wrong.
  • 0

#10 Mr. Ambien

Mr. Ambien

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,536 posts
  • Joined: 07-April 03

Posted 04 January 2013 - 10:15 AM

^ Indeed, due to the high chances of litigation against them, there was no way they could extend this hand without possibly screwing themselves. The excessively sensitive people, including those who received the letters, whining about this need to get a grip.

Edited by zaibatsu, 04 January 2013 - 10:16 AM.

  • 0

#11 Lockhart

Lockhart

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,310 posts
  • Joined: 30-July 09

Posted 04 January 2013 - 11:37 AM

Hey your son/daughter/mother/father got shot but here's some free movie tickets to make up for it.
  • 0

#12 SterlingArcher

SterlingArcher

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 945 posts
  • Joined: 03-August 11

Posted 04 January 2013 - 08:36 PM

Hey your son/daughter/mother/father got shot but here's some free movie tickets to make up for it.


Better than nothing
  • 0
Posted Image
Posted Image-Mod note: Inappropriate

#13 Mr. Ambien

Mr. Ambien

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,536 posts
  • Joined: 07-April 03

Posted 04 January 2013 - 08:50 PM

Better than nothing

But not better than "here let me open my mouth and wallet so that it can be used in court against me to syphon cash from my bank account as financial liability for some nutcase's rampage".
  • 0

#14 butters

butters

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,369 posts
  • Joined: 23-July 04

Posted 07 January 2013 - 12:28 AM

ya, still pales in comparison to suing the theater as far as stupid decisions go.
  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.