DunCanuck Posted January 7, 2013 Share Posted January 7, 2013 Well I'll be sure not to be surprised now that you have brought it to my attention. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noheart Posted January 7, 2013 Share Posted January 7, 2013 That is great and all and I hope I am wrong. I just don't see how people can be happy with an undersized forward with his point production. Intangibles are great but they only go so far especially when your small. He has to score goals. If he is as smart and skilled as you all say he us then he should make the players around him better. Blaming a coach for lack of success is also hard to accept. Don't forget who Arniel has developed. He didn't just wake up one day and became a bad coach. He like most any coach needs talent to work with and we can all safely say that there is a lack of that in Chicago. He had something to work with when he coached the moose. Is Mac T a bad coach too? Cause he didn't have any luck either. It just doesn't make any sense to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lockhart Posted January 7, 2013 Share Posted January 7, 2013 I don't see Schroeder ever being an impact player in the NHL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bodee Posted January 7, 2013 Share Posted January 7, 2013 Having said that, I would be fine with giving Schroeder a shot too. I just don't think AV is built that way to be honest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sergei Shirokov Posted January 7, 2013 Share Posted January 7, 2013 I'd prefer JS as a 2nd or 3rd line RW instead of centre. I think it could be pretty effective against smaller teams with Booth and Kesler....who like to shoot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldnews Posted January 7, 2013 Share Posted January 7, 2013 "@dowbboy: Mike Shanahan has proclaimed Ryan Kesler "ready to go"." No to worry people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WolfxHaley Posted January 7, 2013 Share Posted January 7, 2013 Here is the record of those that believe Jordan will make the club and where he will play. Allow me to tally this record and update and revise it until the NUCKS go with their main line-up after five regular season games or so: crazy 4 nazzy 2nd line,pimp c 2nd line ,old news 3rd line,RustyShackleford 2nd line,canuck_trevor16 2nd line,DeNiro 4th line,SodaPop 2nd line,spectacular 2nd line,moonshinef 4th line,JimLahey 2nd line,zoolander 2/3rd line,Garrison 2nd/3rd line,bossram 2nd line,playboi third line,Smasshian Kassian 3rd line Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SamJamIam Posted January 7, 2013 Share Posted January 7, 2013 What a disaster that would be. Seriously? you would have all 3 of these guys in the one line? There is not a defensively astute player amongst them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Dasein Posted January 7, 2013 Share Posted January 7, 2013 Why does it even matter? What are you trying to prove? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nuck nit Posted January 8, 2013 Share Posted January 8, 2013 Why does it even matter? What are you trying to prove? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nuck nit Posted January 8, 2013 Share Posted January 8, 2013 It doesn't. That he's a troll. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bodee Posted January 8, 2013 Share Posted January 8, 2013 I think you should check the stats of Canucks' puck possession while Booth is on the ice. His control of the play is second only to the Burrows-Sedin cycle game. If you see how Kesler and Raymond rate comparatively, it's pretty clear that Booth kept that line from being a total disaster. Booth isn't the hardest backchecker but his defensive ability was brought about by his ability to get the puck out of the zone and create chances. Booth won a lot of battles along the boards, carried the puck and didn't give it up until it was out of play. This is far better defense than eagerly backchecking because you lost the puck in the first place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nuck nit Posted January 8, 2013 Share Posted January 8, 2013 But realistically, I don't like the prospect of Schroeder on the second line, but I'd like to see him on the third in the right circumstances.. On the third line, Schroeder would be between Higgins If they could make Hodgson (who was a slow 185lbs last year) work, they can manage with the faster, grittier Schroeder (180 lbs), who as far as I'm concerned, has every bit as much to work with. I think Schroeder will make as good a role player as Hodgson did, and would give the third line some scoring punch when needed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smashian Kassian Posted January 8, 2013 Share Posted January 8, 2013 I don't see Schroeder ever being an impact player in the NHL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smashian Kassian Posted January 8, 2013 Share Posted January 8, 2013 Yeah,it matters,because at the end of the day the opinions will be seen to be what they are. If it does not matter,why post what you believe? If you are giving your opinion are you trying to prove something or are you a fan? If you are a fan then it comes back to opinions.Opinions are not facts and your opinions are noted to be presented at a later date. Enjoy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smashian Kassian Posted January 8, 2013 Share Posted January 8, 2013 Realistically,Schroeder is going back to Chicago. Bashing Hodgson to make Schroeder look better is not going to secure him a position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nuck nit Posted January 8, 2013 Share Posted January 8, 2013 Lol look in the mirror with these statements. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nuck nit Posted January 8, 2013 Share Posted January 8, 2013 Presenting facts to support his opinion isn't bashing Hodgson. The fact of the matter is Schroeder is faster, weights almost just as much for being a smaller player, and is better defensively. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smashian Kassian Posted January 8, 2013 Share Posted January 8, 2013 I was thinking of you and some of your homer buddies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nuck nit Posted January 8, 2013 Share Posted January 8, 2013 Comparing Shroeder to Hodgson means nothing as the kid is twenty pounds lighter ,probably four inches smaller and has not played an NHL game despite four years of AHL play. Your facts are not consistent with reality. I have had enough of your `` Cody love`` immature remarks so try to make some rational statements or just stop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.