Jump to content

Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Photo

(Value of) Edler to Vancouver (deadline 2014)


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
15 replies to this topic

#1 palindrom

palindrom

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,072 posts
  • Joined: 09-December 10

Posted 06 January 2013 - 08:58 PM

lets say Edler sign as a UFA, a 5 years deal summer 2013 with another team. (a 5 000 000$/ season deal)

This team is out of playoff next season and Vancouver explore to possibility to bring back Edler.

what should we give to bring him back?

Edited by palindrom, 06 January 2013 - 09:03 PM.

Posted Image Was too much for me!

Instead im reading English grammar for advanced dummies





#2 AriGold

AriGold

    Hairy Old

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,028 posts
  • Joined: 09-June 12

Posted 06 January 2013 - 09:02 PM

ummmm :blink:

 mr-selfridge-jeremy-piven-interview-slic


#3 ConnorFutureGM

ConnorFutureGM

    Comets Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 327 posts
  • Joined: 05-March 11

Posted 06 January 2013 - 09:12 PM

The scenario you mention is very specific and only a possibility of many.

#4 Pears

Pears

    Canucks All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,612 posts
  • Joined: 14-November 11

Posted 06 January 2013 - 09:14 PM

If Edler goes, he's gone. No bringing him back.

In my eyes drouin is overrated he can score in the qmjhl but did nothing in last two gold medal games that canada lost. Fox will be better pro than him talk to me in five yrs


   ryan kesler is going to the chicago blackhawks ...       quote me on it


#5 Mr.DirtyDangles

Mr.DirtyDangles

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,840 posts
  • Joined: 04-April 10

Posted 06 January 2013 - 09:19 PM

Wow ! Oh this is going to be pure comedy for the next few weeks. In what realm does VAN NOT resign EDLER ?

Edited by vanfan73, 06 January 2013 - 09:19 PM.

giphy.gif


#6 Strawberries

Strawberries

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,563 posts
  • Joined: 24-February 09

Posted 06 January 2013 - 09:20 PM

he won't be back if he leaves in the first place
Posted Image

#7 c00kies

c00kies

    Cookie Monster

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,968 posts
  • Joined: 06-January 07

Posted 06 January 2013 - 09:24 PM

Let's hope Buffalo signs him, then we trade Bieksa and Hamhuis for Edler and Ehrhoff ;)
Posted Image
Thanks to Blueberries for the sig :)

#8 WHL rocks

WHL rocks

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,618 posts
  • Joined: 09-May 10

Posted 06 January 2013 - 09:29 PM

Edler has a NTC and NMC with this "other" team he signed with.

#9 Grape

Grape

    Fruit

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,443 posts
  • Joined: 29-December 11

Posted 06 January 2013 - 09:41 PM

Let's hope Buffalo signs him, then we trade Bieksa and Hamhuis for Edler and Ehrhoff ;)

So Bieksa and Hamhuis for Ehrhoff basically? No thanks.

mj761l.jpg0007.gif0007.gif0007.gif0007.gif  
Signature Credit to Vintage Canuck!


#10 Zoolander

Zoolander

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,199 posts
  • Joined: 29-February 12

Posted 06 January 2013 - 09:46 PM

Let's hope Buffalo signs him, then we trade Bieksa and Hamhuis for Edler and Ehrhoff ;)


So we trade 2 35pt defencemen who play at both ends of the rink, for 2 50pt d-men who are inconsistent in their own end? Ehrhoff especially.
My 2014 Draft wishlist: 1st rd: Draisaitl, Virtanen, Scherbak. 2nd rd: Brendan Lemieux, Thatcher Demko (Goalie)
Posted Image
Future Canucks top 6:
Shinkaruk-Draisaitl-Scherbak
Virtanen-Horvat-Jensen

#11 c00kies

c00kies

    Cookie Monster

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,968 posts
  • Joined: 06-January 07

Posted 06 January 2013 - 09:48 PM

So we trade 2 35pt defencemen who play at both ends of the rink, for 2 50pt d-men who are inconsistent in their own end? Ehrhoff especially.


lol I wasn't being serious. I would never trade Hamhuis seeing as he is our best (defensive) d-man.
Posted Image
Thanks to Blueberries for the sig :)

#12 palindrom

palindrom

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,072 posts
  • Joined: 09-December 10

Posted 07 January 2013 - 01:07 AM

he won't be back if he leaves in the first place


But if he sign with us, why would he be traded as soon as we sign him, as many proposal suggest?
Posted Image Was too much for me!

Instead im reading English grammar for advanced dummies





#13 Phil_314

Phil_314

    Canucks Second-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,573 posts
  • Joined: 07-November 09

Posted 07 January 2013 - 02:04 AM

lol I wasn't being serious. I would never trade Hamhuis seeing as he is our best (defensive) d-man.


thank goodness :P

@ OP: hopefully the price is right and he'd stay around and re-sign long-term!

John 3:16
For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. 17 For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.


Jesus LOVES YOU!
2012, meet Matthew 24:36-47!

14 I press on toward the goal to win the prize for which God has called me heavenward in Christ Jesus.


#14 Hunter.S-Kerouac

Hunter.S-Kerouac

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,099 posts
  • Joined: 20-October 11

Posted 07 January 2013 - 12:36 PM

if he signed elsewhere for 5 mill I can't see any reason the canucks wouldn't match that and he would remain a canuck. only way he goes is if another team offers 6mill plus and if that happened no way would I trade to bring him back he would be gone.

#15 G-52

G-52

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 694 posts
  • Joined: 29-April 12

Posted 07 January 2013 - 12:54 PM

Wow ! Oh this is going to be pure comedy for the next few weeks. In what realm does VAN NOT resign EDLER ?


The realm in which Edler doesn't want to sign in Vancouver? But then of course we would never trade to get him back either.. Pointless thread is pointless

Posted Image


#16 zombieksa

zombieksa

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,363 posts
  • Joined: 03-February 11

Posted 07 January 2013 - 03:48 PM

The answer is an obvious no. Not to mention if he wanted 5yr 5M chances are he would get it here. He signs somewhere else we'd still have the cap space assets to find a (RH) D man.

I also am kind of take it or leave it with Edler. Bieksa can basically do everything he can. Bieksa with Edler's PP time would have had over 50pts last season. Plus he can fight and hit, log big minutes and play tough competition. Garrison is essentially the same player as Hamhuis (just less proven), so I think finding a comparable RHD to Bieksa would be more ideal than signing Edler for over half a decade....

So can I be the first of the season to say Edler, Booth, Ballard, Raymond, 1st for Weber? :bigblush:
"All religion, my friend, is simply evolved out of fraud, fear, greed, imagination, and poetry."
-Edgar Allen Poe




Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.