• Announcements

    • StealthNuck

      Forum-specific Rules   07/11/2017

      These are board specific rules for the Trades and Rumors forum designed to provide organization and a better experience for everyone. Please review these rules before posting new threads. 
        THREAD ETIQUETTE   1. Please search for an existing thread before posting. This forum can be very fast moving, so it's understandable if redundant threads are inadvertently posted. In such a case, please use the report feature to request removal of redundant threads.    2. Provide a clearly identifiable topic title so that users can readily understand the content. The title should include any and all teams involved, as well as player names or other personnel involved as appropriate.   3. All trades, signings, rumors and other news MUST include a linkable source. Simply posting the name of the source is not enough. Effort should also be made to copy and paste the full article, or at the very least the relevant portion of text from the source to the first post of the thread. Moderators may remove low-quality threads in favour of high-quality threads. 

      Affixed to the front of your title should be a label that identifies the type of transaction that is taking place. For all trades use [TRADE]. For all signings use [SIGNING]. For all waiver-wire transactions use [WAIVERS]. For all rumours use [RUMOUR].
      For articles or news items that don't fit into the above categories, affix an appropriate label of your choice such as [NEWS], [ARTICLE] or [MISC].   4. When the status of a thread changes a new thread can be created. The new thread should reflect the change and help focus the discussion on current events. e.g. Someone may create a new thread when a rumor becomes a trades. The old thread will be locked by the moderating team.    5. Do not misrepresent the contents of your thread or post false trades or rumors. Trolling will result in a permanent suspension. 

      SOURCES   The following source types are considered INVALID. Any links to posts or threads on other message boards Any links to personal blogs Any news heard on the radio that does not have a link to an audio vault or podcast Any news seen on television that does not have a link to online video Any news spread by word of mouth
      Additionally, certain sources may be be blacklisted due to poor credentials, clear traffic-mongering etc. Blacklisted sources will be posted here. 
      Thank you for your co-operation and please PM the Administrator or Moderators if you have any questions, concerns or suggestions regarding this forum.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Avicii

[PTO] Cam Barker with Canucks?

Recommended Posts

That would be a good one. Barker was so highly touted after being on the WJHC gold medal winning teams

Seems like he deserves a chance to prove himself

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hockeyville, you shouldve locked mine! You beat me

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why? The guy couldn't even make it on the Texas Stars of the AHL, they let him walk after a 25 game tryout this year. If I remember correctly, he's also had a couple of ankle injuries that have pretty much all but destroyed his lateral movement. Maybe for the 6-8th spot on the wolves, but that's about it, IMO

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why? The guy couldn't even make it on the Texas Stars of the AHL, they let him walk after a 25 game tryout. If I remember correctly, he's also had a couple of ankle injuries that have pretty much all but destroyed his lateral movement. Maybe for the 6-8th spot on the wolves, but that's about it, IMO

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

More competition is a good thing. He has the talent to play at the NHL level, just never put it all together. Low risk, medium reward.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't mind him here. It adds more depth to our defence since we have been battling with injuries on the blueline for years now and with departure of Rome. He does have size and strength, but the problem is he is Inconsistent.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He may not be fantastic, but hes big bodied and has shown an ability to log big minutes, even +/- on the Oilers last season in 25 games.

Still.. I think I prefer Alberts as the big bodied plug D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolutely. I think it would be foolish to pass up on a guy like that if you can at least offer him a tryout.

A big dude @ 6'3 220. A few very solid seasons: 40pts in 68 games. 14 in 51. 18 in 45.

And he's by no means over the hill @ 26 years old. Half this board is older than the guy.... Well, maybe not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He was a super high pick...I'd be actually pretty happy if this were true.

Maybe he just needs a change of scenery. A city's atmosphere and a team that will accept you can do a lot for a player's confidence in the NHL. He's a big-bodied defenceman who could re-kindle his career and has no down-side since it's just a tryout.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing to be lost from giving him a tryout. If he performs well and impresses the staff, he's added on a cheap one-year deal. If he disappoints, we continue on as normal. Wouldn't mind seeing him on the lower end of the D chart in case of injuries (which could be devastating in such a short season).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cam Barker has the physical tools to become a big player in the NHL. Too bad, he's slow, has low hockey IQ, and lacks dedication. Fix 1/3 of those problems and he's back in the NHL. Fix 2/3 and he's in your top 4. Fix 3/3 of those problems. You got top defense man. Good luck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is absolutely no risk in inviting Barker to camp. If he performs, that is, plays physically, doesn't turn the puck over and shows some mobility, Barker could be a great pick up.

Do it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

AFAIK he's had some very big struggles with D&A abuse. I like giving those guys a 2nd chance like we did last year w/ Todd Fedoruk.

Good luck, Cam.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

AFAIK he's had some very big struggles with D&A abuse. I like giving those guys a 2nd chance like we did last year w/ Todd Fedoruk.

Good luck, Cam.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't mind Barker at all. Him and Vandermeer would be solid for depth on D.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.