Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

dudeone

Unhinged Tactical Response CEO threatens to ‘start killing people’ over Obama’s gun control

131 posts in this topic

Well that escalated quickly. So Obama is Hitler now? Is that what you're trying to get at. <_<

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When was the last time a tyrannical government was in control of the united states?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What's to PHYSICALLY stop one from taking over if the citizenry were disarmed? Many other countries seem to have no problem falling into one.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you guys just dont get it.

if the gov't stormed into your house and shipped you and your entire family off to a death camp, what are you going to do? call the police?

the 2nd amendment is in place to stop a tyrannical gov't, enemies foreign and domestic.

ask the jews how much they would have loved an assault rifle to protect their lives during hitler's reign.

ask the 3 million cambodians massacred by the khmer rouge how much they would have loved an assault rifle.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Read up on "assault rifles". Personally, I don't see how the intent of an assault rifle is for (1) hunting purposes or (2) protection.

They are an incredibly powerful weapon with no other purpose than to shoot and kill and kill and kill over again.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But no-one is trying to take guns away .. they are trying to limit the fire power .. where do you draw the line? .. why can you not then have bazooka's and surface to surface missiles? .. there MUST be limit's!!! .. that is the point the ignorant keep missing, or intentionally avoiding .. :picard:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is what i was talking about. It's one thing to put in a gun control law, but it's a completely different matter to try and take these weapons away from some of the gun nut 'clubs' that have them. And there are millions of gun nuts in the US.

Civil war indeed.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Read up on "assault rifles". Personally, I don't see how the intent of an assault rifle is for (1) hunting purposes or (2) protection.

They are an incredibly powerful weapon with no other purpose than to shoot and kill and kill and kill over again.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes they are, of course they won't take away the Fudd's politically correct guns until they've gotten rid of all the "evil" guns, so you're good for now.

As far as "limits" go, the 2nd Amendment doesn't specify any, didn't Obama say he wanted to see a "Civilian National Security Force" that would be "just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded as the U.S. Military".

Sounds like the U.S. Militia needs an upgrade!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jesus Christ, after so many threads I don't even know why anyone entertains these posts anymore. Yes, the big bad liberal government is coming for your guns and Obama's death panels will kill grandma. They already took yer machine guns!

negev_2.jpg

I'm sure you think Billy Bob should be able to get one at Wal-Mart or a gun show without a background check, huh? And left with the full belt on the porch, never know when the government will just roll up and try to take your tax money. Children are more reasonable than gun proponents.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You're right, the 2nd Amendment should be limited to obsolete weaponry just as the 1st Amendment should protect only those using obsolete forms of communication!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When was the last time a tyrannical government was in control of the united states?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You're right, the 2nd Amendment should be limited to obsolete weaponry just as the 1st Amendment should protect only those using obsolete forms of communication!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The most amazing thing about all these American gun nuts is just how little noise they make for their rights that have been infringed over the last decade, starting with Dubya and continuing under Obama. Americans wouldn't know tyranny if it hit them in the face, imprisoned their brother, and sent their children to war for the rulers' benefit. Waaaaaaaait a minute! TO ARMS! F'king morons.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, you're right, the 2nd should permit all types of firearms without any regulation. Otherwise it's tyranny.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If the US Constitution stated one must only crap in an outhouse or the woods, and keep away from their main dwelling, I have a feeling any attempts at sanitation would also be met with cries of tyranny. "It's a god-given right to not have a toilet!" they would say.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The elite attacking the United States Constitution and furthering their own ends at the expense of the citizenry, is tyranny...

Guns are only part of the picture here, in light of the ongoing attempts to control rights in other areas such as the Patriot Act.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So you agree, Billy Bob should be able to go to Wal-Mart and buy an M249? And if not, it is tyranny? What if I wanted something a little more... firepowery? Say... a flamethrower. Should those be in isle 7? With rocket propelled grenades lining the corners of the isles? Don't want to be outmatched and outclassed by the US Military machine. I guess tanks and heavy artillery should be just out back.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The most amazing thing about all these American gun nuts is just how little noise they make for their rights that have been infringed over the last decade, starting with Dubya and continuing under Obama. Americans wouldn't know tyranny if it hit them in the face, imprisoned their brother, and sent their children to war for the rulers' benefit. Waaaaaaaait a minute! TO ARMS! F'king morons.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If the US Constitution stated one must only crap in an outhouse or the woods, and keep away from their main dwelling, I have a feeling any attempts at sanitation would also be met with cries of tyranny. "It's a god-given right to not have a toilet!" they would say.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.