Jump to content

Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Photo

Unhinged Tactical Response CEO threatens to ‘start killing people’ over Obama’s gun control


  • Please log in to reply
130 replies to this topic

#1 dudeone

dudeone

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 807 posts
  • Joined: 17-February 04

Posted 10 January 2013 - 07:57 PM

Unhinged Tactical Response CEO threatens to ‘start killing people’ over Obama’s gun control

By David Edwards

Thursday, January 10, 2013 9:57 EST

http://www.rawstory....as-gun-control/

The CEO of a Tennessee company that specializes weapons and tactical training is threatening to “start killing people” if President Barack Obama moves forward with gun control measures.

In a video posted to YouTube and Facebook on Wednesday, Tactical Response CEO James Yeager went ballistic over reports that the president could take executive action with minor gun control measures after the mass shooting of 20 school children in Connecticut last month.

After the Drudge Report likened Obama to Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin on Wednesday, pro-gun conservatives expressed outrage over the idea that the White House could act without Congress.

“Vice President [Joe] Biden is asking the president to bypass Congress and use executive privilege, executive order to ban assault rifles and to impose stricter gun control,” Yeager explained in his video message. “frack that.”

“I’m telling you that if that happens, it’s going to spark a civil war, and I’ll be glad to fire the first shot. I’m not putting up with it. You shouldn’t put up with it. And I need all you patriots to start thinking about what you’re going to do, load your damn mags, make sure your rifle’s clean, pack a backpack with some food in it and get ready to fight.”

The CEO concluded: “I’m not ???? putting up with this. I’m not letting my country be ruled by a dictator. I’m not letting anybody take my guns! If it goes one inch further, I’m going to start killing people.”

As The Atlantic small steps like modernizing the background check system and limiting importation of assault rifles.

By Thursday morning, the video promising violence in response to gun control measures had beenremoved from Yeager’s YouTube page, but the link had not been removed from Facebook.

Calls to Yeager and Tactical Response were not returned by the time of publication.

Watch this video, uploaded to YouTube on Jan. 9, 2013.

Edited by dudeone, 10 January 2013 - 07:58 PM.

  • 0

#2 Tearloch7

Tearloch7

    Canucks Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,694 posts
  • Joined: 15-July 10

Posted 10 January 2013 - 08:00 PM

*
POPULAR

He should be under arrest as we speak .. hopefully he resists arrest when they go for him ..
  • 5

"To Thine Own Self Be True"

 

"Always tell the Truth. That way, you don’t have to remember what you said"  ~ Mark Twain ~
 


#3 DeNiro

DeNiro

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,860 posts
  • Joined: 22-April 08

Posted 10 January 2013 - 08:02 PM

*
POPULAR

Enjoy your visit with the FBI, jerkoff.

It's really scary how much people like this love guns. How can you love an object who's only purpose is to kill?
  • 5

Posted Image


"Dream until the dream come true"


#4 Stefan

Stefan

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,401 posts
  • Joined: 18-September 03

Posted 10 January 2013 - 08:03 PM

Sounds like a reasonable course of action.
  • 1

gallery_9059_470_12899.jpg


(1 Peter 2:18)

Slaves, be subject to your masters with all reverence, not only to those who are good and equitable but also to those who are perverse.



 

#5 surtur

surtur

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,767 posts
  • Joined: 19-March 10

Posted 10 January 2013 - 08:09 PM

Honestly if i lived in the USA I to would like to keep my guns esp since all the new laws being passed in the last 10 years destroying there freedoms. how else can you fight back...
  • 3
Release The KraKassian
Posted Image

#6 Where's Wellwood

Where's Wellwood

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,146 posts
  • Joined: 12-May 10

Posted 10 January 2013 - 08:10 PM

He's only furthering the cause by acting like that.
  • 1
Posted Image
Credit to khalifawiz501 for the sig.
My old sig: http://tinypic.com/v...=5#.UlSrrlAWJ7U

#7 Dazzle

Dazzle

    Canucks Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,913 posts
  • Joined: 27-June 06

Posted 10 January 2013 - 08:16 PM

Comes to show you that being a CEO doesn't necessarily mean you have the brains.

I've found that people are stupid in general, especially with a little bit of liquor in them.

Scary thing is that he's calling the President a dictator, but when he's saying that "if it goes any further, then..." this is equivalent to blackmail - and he is no better than this Dictator that he speaks of.

He should be forced to resign if not more.

Edited by Dazzle, 10 January 2013 - 08:17 PM.

  • 0
Posted Image --> THANKS EGATTI.

I have to say Dazzle's was the coolest. ROTFLOL


#8 MoneypuckOverlord

MoneypuckOverlord

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,385 posts
  • Joined: 24-September 09

Posted 10 January 2013 - 11:38 PM

He needs to be arrested for saying something like that.
  • 0

Players Nikolaj Ehlers have been compared too by the fan base of the Vancouver Canucks.

 

1 Pavel Bure

2 Markus Naslund

3 Nathan Mackkinon

4 Jonathan Drouin.

5 Jonathan Tavares

 

http://bleacherrepor...d-top-prospects

combine results.  Ehlers 5'11 162 lbs of solid rock.  


#9 :D

:D

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 20,769 posts
  • Joined: 14-August 03

Posted 11 January 2013 - 12:41 AM

He seems like a mentally stable, well-adjusted guy.

I'm glad he has guns in case the King of England came back and started getting into people's faces. This is AMERICA and if you don't like it, you can GIT OUT
  • 0

#10 ynot-llat

ynot-llat

    Comets Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 465 posts
  • Joined: 22-May 08

Posted 11 January 2013 - 01:42 AM

Enjoy your visit with the FBI, jerkoff.

It's really scary how much people like this love guns. How can you love an object who's only purpose is to kill?


you guys just dont get it.
if the gov't stormed into your house and shipped you and your entire family off to a death camp, what are you going to do? call the police?
the 2nd amendment is in place to stop a tyrannical gov't, enemies foreign and domestic.

ask the jews how much they would have loved an assault rifle to protect their lives during hitler's reign.
ask the 3 million cambodians massacred by the khmer rouge how much they would have loved an assault rifle.
  • 0

#11 Wetcoaster

Wetcoaster

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 40,454 posts
  • Joined: 26-April 04

Posted 11 January 2013 - 01:44 AM

He needs to be arrested for saying something like that.

He was just exercising his First Amendment rights to ensure that his Second Amendment rights were not being trampled, eh?
  • 0
To err is human - but to really screw up you need a computer.

Always listen to experts. They'll tell you what can't be done and why. Then do it.

Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati

Illegitimi non carborundum.

Never try to teach a pig to sing - it wastes your time and annoys the pig.

#12 DeNiro

DeNiro

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,860 posts
  • Joined: 22-April 08

Posted 11 January 2013 - 01:51 AM

you guys just dont get it.
if the gov't stormed into your house and shipped you and your entire family off to a death camp, what are you going to do? call the police?
the 2nd amendment is in place to stop a tyrannical gov't, enemies foreign and domestic.

ask the jews how much they would have loved an assault rifle to protect their lives during hitler's reign.
ask the 3 million cambodians massacred by the khmer rouge how much they would have loved an assault rifle.


Well that escalated quickly. So Obama is Hitler now? Is that what you're trying to get at. <_<

Sorry, but it doesn't matter how many weapons a whack job like this has, the government and the military will always have bigger and better weapons. If they really wanted to come take this guys guns away, his little assault weapon wouldn't be able to stop them.

Edited by DeNiro, 11 January 2013 - 01:52 AM.

  • 0

Posted Image


"Dream until the dream come true"


#13 trek

trek

    Canucks Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,137 posts
  • Joined: 19-April 04

Posted 11 January 2013 - 01:57 AM

the 2nd amendment is in place to stop a tyrannical gov't, enemies foreign and domestic.


assault rifle vs. F-15. mmmmk.

Edited by trek, 11 January 2013 - 01:58 AM.

  • 0

#14 SkeeterHansen

SkeeterHansen

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,140 posts
  • Joined: 24-May 11

Posted 11 January 2013 - 02:22 AM

RUN, CARRIE UNDERWOOD. RUN FOR YOUR BEAUTIFUL LIFE!!
  • 0

/=S=/


#15 SkeeterHansen

SkeeterHansen

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,140 posts
  • Joined: 24-May 11

Posted 11 January 2013 - 02:24 AM

you guys just dont get it.
if the gov't stormed into your house and shipped you and your entire family off to a death camp, what are you going to do? call the police?
the 2nd amendment is in place to stop a tyrannical gov't, enemies foreign and domestic.

ask the jews how much they would have loved an assault rifle to protect their lives during hitler's reign.
ask the 3 million cambodians massacred by the khmer rouge how much they would have loved an assault rifle.


I can't, they're dead.


That was heartless, Yappy...
  • 0

/=S=/


#16 ynot-llat

ynot-llat

    Comets Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 465 posts
  • Joined: 22-May 08

Posted 11 January 2013 - 02:27 AM

assault rifle vs. F-15. mmmmk.


yea and also water is wet.
if they dropped a bomb from an f15 on a civilian neighbourhood, it would just further strengthen and fuel the patriots to dig in and fight.

just because an idiot uses a tool to harm people, doesn't make it right for the gov't to take away the right's of others.
  • 0

#17 DeNiro

DeNiro

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,860 posts
  • Joined: 22-April 08

Posted 11 January 2013 - 02:44 AM

*
POPULAR

yea and also water is wet.
if they dropped a bomb from an f15 on a civilian neighbourhood, it would just further strengthen and fuel the patriots to dig in and fight.

just because an idiot uses a tool to harm people, doesn't make it right for the gov't to take away the right's of others.


Well assualt rifles are going to get banned. So you're just gonna have to get used to the idea of not being able to fire 100's of rounds into crowds of people.

The idea that it would ever come down to american civilians fighting their own government, is the kind of irrational thinking that makes me worried that these people have these weapons. From every one of these pro gun people I've listened to, they all seem to have the same unstable, irrational thought patterns that makes it impossible to have an intelligent conversation.

Edited by DeNiro, 11 January 2013 - 02:45 AM.

  • 5

Posted Image


"Dream until the dream come true"


#18 Dellins

Dellins

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,708 posts
  • Joined: 14-April 09

Posted 11 January 2013 - 03:10 AM

you guys just dont get it.
if the gov't stormed into your house and shipped you and your entire family off to a death camp, what are you going to do? call the police?
the 2nd amendment is in place to stop a tyrannical gov't, enemies foreign and domestic.

ask the jews how much they would have loved an assault rifle to protect their lives during hitler's reign.
ask the 3 million cambodians massacred by the khmer rouge how much they would have loved an assault rifle.


What the hell?
  • 0

#19 Violator

Violator

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,030 posts
  • Joined: 01-February 07

Posted 11 January 2013 - 04:03 AM

you guys just dont get it.
if the gov't stormed into your house and shipped you and your entire family off to a death camp, what are you going to do? call the police?
the 2nd amendment is in place to stop a tyrannical gov't, enemies foreign and domestic.

ask the jews how much they would have loved an assault rifle to protect their lives during hitler's reign.
ask the 3 million cambodians massacred by the khmer rouge how much they would have loved an assault rifle.


When was the last time a tyrannical government was in control of the united states?
  • 0

#20 Wolfman Jack

Wolfman Jack

    Canucks Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,500 posts
  • Joined: 27-April 07

Posted 11 January 2013 - 06:06 AM

you guys just dont get it.
if the gov't stormed into your house and shipped you and your entire family off to a death camp, what are you going to do? call the police?
the 2nd amendment is in place to stop a tyrannical gov't, enemies foreign and domestic.

ask the jews how much they would have loved an assault rifle to protect their lives during hitler's reign.
ask the 3 million cambodians massacred by the khmer rouge how much they would have loved an assault rifle.

Your the one who doesn't get it, stop beating people over the head with the second amendment and try actually READING IT.

As passed by the Congress:


A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.


Nowhere does it say anything about opposing a tyrannical government, or anything about the TYPE of arms allowed, funny how you pro-gun people seem to keep missing the words WELL REGULATED MILITIA. This was written when the country had no standing army, and was still in danger of attack by the British, Spanish, and Indian Nations, also at the time Rifles were still quite a rarity, all guns were muzzle loaded single shot, and not very accurate beyond about 40 yards, a professional soldier under ideal conditions MIGHT get off 4 shots in a minute. No way they writers of this could foresee the advances in weaponry that have taken place or the creation of the US military. They seemed to have had the model used by the Swiss in mind.

http://en.wikipedia...._in_Switzerland
  • 2
Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from religious conviction.
Blaise Pascal

#21 Buggernut

Buggernut

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 32,526 posts
  • Joined: 15-March 03

Posted 11 January 2013 - 06:21 AM

Well that escalated quickly. So Obama is Hitler now? Is that what you're trying to get at. <_<


Who's to say somebody who's not quite so nice as Obama won't be president 20, 30, 40 years down the road when the citizens are disarmed according to plan?

What if you happened to have a gun and shot an intruder in your home who was attacking you or your family, and owed you or your life to it? Should you go to jail for it? Should you be a sacrificial lamb for the "greater good of society" of having a disarmed populace and fewer people getting killed overall?

Edited by Buggernut, 11 January 2013 - 07:05 AM.

  • 0

#22 Buggernut

Buggernut

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 32,526 posts
  • Joined: 15-March 03

Posted 11 January 2013 - 06:23 AM

When was the last time a tyrannical government was in control of the united states?


What's to PHYSICALLY stop one from taking over if the citizenry were disarmed? Many other countries seem to have no problem falling into one.
  • 0

#23 Tearloch7

Tearloch7

    Canucks Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,694 posts
  • Joined: 15-July 10

Posted 11 January 2013 - 07:49 AM

What's to PHYSICALLY stop one from taking over if the citizenry were disarmed? Many other countries seem to have no problem falling into one.


But no-one is trying to take guns away .. they are trying to limit the fire power .. where do you draw the line? .. why can you not then have bazooka's and surface to surface missiles? .. there MUST be limit's!!! .. that is the point the ignorant keep missing, or intentionally avoiding .. :picard:
  • 1

"To Thine Own Self Be True"

 

"Always tell the Truth. That way, you don’t have to remember what you said"  ~ Mark Twain ~
 


#24 Bertuzzi Babe

Bertuzzi Babe

    Canucks Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,239 posts
  • Joined: 03-May 03

Posted 11 January 2013 - 07:54 AM

you guys just dont get it.
if the gov't stormed into your house and shipped you and your entire family off to a death camp, what are you going to do? call the police?
the 2nd amendment is in place to stop a tyrannical gov't, enemies foreign and domestic.

ask the jews how much they would have loved an assault rifle to protect their lives during hitler's reign.
ask the 3 million cambodians massacred by the khmer rouge how much they would have loved an assault rifle.


Congratulations........ only 10 posts to Godwin the thread.....must be some sort of record, even for CDC. Well done, old chap. Pip, pip and all that........
  • 0

"Sursumredditio" non usquam in hac mea loquantur!



Ense petit placidam sub libertate quietem.....



#25 EX_Bert_Worshipper

EX_Bert_Worshipper

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,833 posts
  • Joined: 27-January 06

Posted 11 January 2013 - 07:59 AM

Read up on "assault rifles". Personally, I don't see how the intent of an assault rifle is for (1) hunting purposes or (2) protection.
They are an incredibly powerful weapon with no other purpose than to shoot and kill and kill and kill over again.
  • 0
Posted Image

#26 Electro Rock

Electro Rock

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,633 posts
  • Joined: 17-March 04

Posted 11 January 2013 - 09:16 AM

But no-one is trying to take guns away .. they are trying to limit the fire power .. where do you draw the line? .. why can you not then have bazooka's and surface to surface missiles? .. there MUST be limit's!!! .. that is the point the ignorant keep missing, or intentionally avoiding .. :picard:


Yes they are, of course they won't take away the Fudd's politically correct guns until they've gotten rid of all the "evil" guns, so you're good for now.

As far as "limits" go, the 2nd Amendment doesn't specify any, didn't Obama say he wanted to see a "Civilian National Security Force" that would be "just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded as the U.S. Military".

Sounds like the U.S. Militia needs an upgrade!

Edited by Electro Rock, 11 January 2013 - 09:17 AM.

  • 0
"The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the name of 'liberalism' they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation, without knowing how it happened."

Norman Thomas

#27 TOMapleLaughs

TOMapleLaughs

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 31,967 posts
  • Joined: 19-September 05

Posted 11 January 2013 - 09:25 AM

This is what i was talking about. It's one thing to put in a gun control law, but it's a completely different matter to try and take these weapons away from some of the gun nut 'clubs' that have them. And there are millions of gun nuts in the US.

Civil war indeed.
  • 0
Posted Image

#28 Electro Rock

Electro Rock

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,633 posts
  • Joined: 17-March 04

Posted 11 January 2013 - 09:30 AM

Read up on "assault rifles". Personally, I don't see how the intent of an assault rifle is for (1) hunting purposes or (2) protection.
They are an incredibly powerful weapon with no other purpose than to shoot and kill and kill and kill over again.


Real assault rifles are heavily restricted, if you mean semiautomatic variants, then those are actually ideal for both hunting and self defence.
  • 0
"The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the name of 'liberalism' they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation, without knowing how it happened."

Norman Thomas

#29 Lockout Casualty

Lockout Casualty

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,005 posts
  • Joined: 06-December 12

Posted 11 January 2013 - 09:35 AM

Yes they are, of course they won't take away the Fudd's politically correct guns until they've gotten rid of all the "evil" guns, so you're good for now.

As far as "limits" go, the 2nd Amendment doesn't specify any, didn't Obama say he wanted to see a "Civilian National Security Force" that would be "just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded as the U.S. Military".

Sounds like the U.S. Militia needs an upgrade!


Jesus Christ, after so many threads I don't even know why anyone entertains these posts anymore. Yes, the big bad liberal government is coming for your guns and Obama's death panels will kill grandma. They already took yer machine guns!

Posted Image

I'm sure you think Billy Bob should be able to get one at Wal-Mart or a gun show without a background check, huh? And left with the full belt on the porch, never know when the government will just roll up and try to take your tax money. Children are more reasonable than gun proponents.
  • 0
“Hi Nigel, just a quick note to say that I am always ready to do exactly what is asked but it would have been a great help to know in advance what the strategy was.”

- Carolyn Stewart Olsen, Conservative Senator.

#30 Electro Rock

Electro Rock

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,633 posts
  • Joined: 17-March 04

Posted 11 January 2013 - 09:40 AM

Jesus Christ, after so many threads I don't even know why anyone entertains these posts anymore. Yes, the big bad liberal government is coming for your guns and Obama's death panels will kill grandma. They already took yer machine guns!

Posted Image

I'm sure you think Billy Bob should be able to get one at Wal-Mart or a gun show without a background check, huh? And left with the full belt on the porch, never know when the government will just roll up and try to take your tax money. Children are more reasonable than gun proponents.


You're right, the 2nd Amendment should be limited to obsolete weaponry just as the 1st Amendment should protect only those using obsolete forms of communication!
  • 1
"The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the name of 'liberalism' they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation, without knowing how it happened."

Norman Thomas




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.