Provost Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 Ottawa is desperate for defence right now (Cowen and Lundin injured). We are desperate for a top 6 forward. Seems like a decent trading partner. We could either do a real impact trade, or a more fringe trade. Eg. To Van - Michalek To Ott - Edler or To Van - one of Neil/Latendresse/O/Brien To Ott - Ballard Depending on the players involved you might need to add fringe elements to deal on either side. Neil and Latendresse just signed so are less likely to be traded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I Got A Boy Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 the thing is.. van wont give up defense for offense once they filll their offense by giving up defense they'd need a top 6 D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spitfire_Spiky Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 Don't agree with the first trade but the second works for me with any of those players coming back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I Got A Boy Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 second is more fair but the general structures of both fail Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Provost Posted January 11, 2013 Author Share Posted January 11, 2013 second is more fair but the general structures of both fail Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlyLow_ Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 Unless Zabinajihad is coming our way, no thanks to shipping Eddy to Ottawa. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Provost Posted January 11, 2013 Author Share Posted January 11, 2013 DP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
allkill326 Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thad Posted January 12, 2013 Share Posted January 12, 2013 Ottawa is gonna have to do better than that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smashian Kassian Posted January 12, 2013 Share Posted January 12, 2013 I kind of agree with I Got a Boy. Edler is much more important for us than Michalek would be, no one would replace Edler's importance on the blueline, and unless we get a pretty decent defensmen I wouldn't move Ballard for more 3rd line guy's, maybe Smith because he is a center, but I doubt they trade any of those players for Ballard myself, and Ballard is great with Tanev and that makes our defense alot better. I don't see either working out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dayman Posted January 12, 2013 Share Posted January 12, 2013 Second one is okay, just that I'm not sure OTT agrees Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zombieksa Posted January 12, 2013 Share Posted January 12, 2013 I am okay with the second trade as long as Franson comes back in a Lu trade. We NEED RH D. I am one of those few people that think Franson would flourish in Vancouver. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrsasaki Posted January 12, 2013 Share Posted January 12, 2013 Ottawa takes that first deal and runs. Second one is probably alright. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bossram Posted January 12, 2013 Share Posted January 12, 2013 I'd do Ballard for Condra honestly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.