• Announcements

    • StealthNuck

      All Threads Must Contain Tags!   07/25/2017

      ALL THREADS MUST CONTAIN TAGS   All threads in this forum must contain tags prefixed to topic titles. The purpose of the tags is to eliminate confusion in recent threads lists, and to create an organized and consistent environment. Moderators may immediately lock and thread that does not contain tags.    Tags must be placed at the start of your thread title, following this exact formatting:    [Tag] Thread Title   Here are some of the most used popular tags:    [Proposal]
      A trade, or trades, for next season, or even the off-season.
      [Off-Season]
      FA signings, off-season trades for RFA's, UFA's rights etc...
      [Value Of]
      (A question regarding a players worth, whether from another team, or the Canucks)
      [Speculation] Posting a rumor (with a source of course), but providing why it could be possible for the Canucks to land that player.   [Discussion]
      Thoughts on team trading strategy and composition.   Please feel free to create your own tag if none of these suit your thread.   

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Pears

(Proposal) Leafs-Flyers

14 posts in this topic

Thought I would try and change the proposals section up a bit without a goalie trade. So here it is

To Toronto: Sean Couturier

To Philadelphia: Jake Gardiner, 2013 2nd

Both teams may be interested in doing this since it fits needs quite nicely. Toronto gets a true top six center and Philly gets a desperately needed D man.

Thoughts?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't do it if I was Philly. I think they are higher on him than schenn.

I think they could get a better dman than Gardiner for couturier.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

MAYBE Philly accepts if you take that 2nd away, but even then they probably wouldn't

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fun idea and fair value but neither team does it because of the possible reprucussions of dealing away a prized prospect for another and you end up trading away the better player in the end...it would be a story line for years and years

It's safer to keep your own prospect and see how he turns out

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Philly already traded Offence for Defence with the JVR and Schenn trade, don't see why they would do it again, especially with Courturier.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure teams will be in a rush to trade for Gardiner with his current concussion symptoms unless A. he gets better finally, or B. they underpay.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think if Philly got the second along with Gardnier, it would be more fair. Other than that you have the thoughts all there!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Philly would do it, but they already did something similar to this. Luke Schenn- JVR. That's why I think this won't work. Why not just trade all of Toronto's defense for all of Philly's prospects?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Philly already traded Offence for Defence with the JVR and Schenn trade, don't see why they would do it again, especially with Courturier.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.