• Announcements

    • StealthNuck

      All Threads Must Contain Tags!   07/25/2017

      ALL THREADS MUST CONTAIN TAGS   All threads in this forum must contain tags prefixed to topic titles. The purpose of the tags is to eliminate confusion in recent threads lists, and to create an organized and consistent environment. Moderators may immediately lock and thread that does not contain tags.    Tags must be placed at the start of your thread title, following this exact formatting:    [Tag] Thread Title   Here are some of the most used popular tags:    [Proposal]
      A trade, or trades, for next season, or even the off-season.
      [Off-Season]
      FA signings, off-season trades for RFA's, UFA's rights etc...
      [Value Of]
      (A question regarding a players worth, whether from another team, or the Canucks)
      [Speculation] Posting a rumor (with a source of course), but providing why it could be possible for the Canucks to land that player.   [Discussion]
      Thoughts on team trading strategy and composition.   Please feel free to create your own tag if none of these suit your thread.   

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

VAN_FAN_MATT

[Proposal] VAN - TOR (yes another freaking VAN + TOR proposal)

20 posts in this topic

Ok so there are tons of Luongo trade rumors and speculation swamping the internet these days, no breaking news here on CDC; but a few Leafs players most mentioned recently in those rumors are Lupul and Kadri. Personally, I don't want Kadri, and Lupul, I'm very doubtful the Leafs would even entertain the idea of trading him, considering he was the teams top scorer last season.

Here is the Luongo trade return I would be satisfied with. Anything less than this and I wont be a happy camper.

To VAN

C. MacArthur

T. Bozak

C. Franson (or Gunnarsson but preferably Franson)

2013 2nd round pick

To TOR

R. Luongo

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

why preferably franson? i feel gunnarson is easily the better option

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would do it but I have a feeling the TML organization might want a little more in return

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok so there are tons of Luongo trade rumors and speculation swamping the internet these days, no breaking news here on CDC; but a few Leafs players most mentioned recently in those rumors are Lupul and Kadri. Personally, I don't want Kadri, and Lupul, I'm very doubtful the Leafs would even entertain the idea of trading him, considering he was the teams top scorer last season.

Here is the Luongo trade return I would be satisfied with. Anything less than this and I wont be a happy camper.

To VAN

C. MacArthur

T. Bozak

C. Franson (or Gunnarsson but preferably Franson)

2013 2nd round pick

To TOR

R. Luongo

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

C. MacArthur Plug

T. Bozak Plug

C. Franson (or Gunnarsson but preferably Franson) 6th defencemen on this team

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

C. MacArthur Plug

T. Bozak Plug

C. Franson (or Gunnarsson but preferably Franson) 6th defencemen on this team

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lol?

MacArthur = perfect second/third line playmaker

Bozak = Perfect second line fill-in Role

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Luongo=Perfect starter

ok so lets say Kesler and Booth comes back. would you slot macarthur over hansen? raymond?

sedin-sedin-burrows

booth-kesler-higgins

Hansen-Bozak-Raymond

McCarthur-Malholtra-Weise

Ok, I'd pay 3.25 mil for a 4th liner

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First Luongo trade that I would accept with the leafs that I've seen yet. Although I think Luo is worth even more than that I think the Leafs say no.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I feel like no deal that comes out of Toronto is going to be sufficient for Luongo.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

sedin-sedin-burrows

booth-kesler-higgins

Hansen-Bozak-Raymond

McCarthur-Malholtra-Weise

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like this deal, but im not sure if its good fit here in Vancouver. We already have good forward depth but by adding two more top 9 forwards i dont know where certain players will fit.

Without doing any trade with Toronto our lines could be like this. (with Kesler)

Sedin - Sedin - Burrows

Booth - Kesler - Kassian

Hansen - Lappy - Higgins

Raymiond - Maholtra - Weise

Now by adding MacArthur and Bozak it will give us tremendous depth, but someone would have to go, also Vancouver would like Kassian to play on the best line possible for his development.

If this trade happens here's lines without Injuries.

Sedin-Sedin-Burrows

Booth-Kesler-Kassian

Hansen-Bozak-MacArthur

Higgins-Lappy-Raymond/Weise

Manny Malholtra would be the oddman out with everyone healthy and i would this Raymond would also be dealt.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Luongo=Perfect starter

ok so lets say Kesler and Booth comes back. would you slot macarthur over hansen? raymond?

sedin-sedin-burrows

booth-kesler-higgins

Hansen-Bozak-Raymond

McCarthur-Malholtra-Weise

Ok, I'd pay 3.25 mil for a 4th liner

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First Luongo trade that I would accept with the leafs that I've seen yet. Although I think Luo is worth even more than that I think the Leafs say no.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is insane... MacArthur is not a 4th liner, and no Lappy or Kassian? With those pickups, raymond really doesnt have a spot.

I'd lean towards this...

Sedin-Sedin-Kassian

McCarthur-Kesler-Burrows

Booth-Bozak-Higgins

Hansen-Malholtra-Lapierre

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like those lines, although I would make a slight adjustment.

Sedin-Sedin-Burrows

McCarthur-Kesler-Kassian

Booth-Bozak-Higgins

Malholtra-Lapierre-Hansen

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

MacArthur is capable of scoring more goals on the second line than eirther of Booth or Raymond. He has scored 20 goals in each of the previous 2 seasons with the Leafs.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

VFM:

I think you've picked out pretty much the best options the Leafs have available without including Grabovski - whose cap hit is simply too high.

I personally would substitute Frattin for MacArthur for a couple of reasons - none of which have to do with thinking he's a "plug" lol - not many "plugs" have 100 points in the past two seasons and are among the best (relative corsi) players on their team. MacArthur is undoubtedly the player with the higher value at this point, but...

Frattin is a right wing - MacArthur a left wing - we are much deeper on the left side and already have to move both Burrows and Raymond to their off wings. Hansen is the only natural RW in the top 9 - hence drafting Jensen and acquiring Kassian. The Canucks could still use another roster RW.

MacArthur is a 3.2 million cap hit, and a pending UFA like Bozak. Bozak is currently at 1.5 - you're gonna have a hard time not going to sign the two of them for their current 4.7 cap hit - very likely rentals who test the UFA market. Cap space will be tight with Edler, Higgins, Lapierre (and Raymond) all pending UFAs and the ceiling dropping to 64 million...

Frattin on the other hand is an RFA at 925k for another year, who I think could have as much upside as MacArthur. He'd also remain a Canuck for at least another year, and they'd still retain his rights thereafter.

Personally I'd rather see less volume and more of a high end young player in return - ie Couturier or Gudbranson, but if it's the Leafs, I think it has to be volume, and yours is a pretty good proposal imo.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.