Jump to content

Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Photo

Van- Anah- EPIC FIRST POST

Proposal

  • Please log in to reply
22 replies to this topic

#1 Rocket10

Rocket10

    K-Wing Prospect

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 7 posts
  • Joined: 14-January 13

Posted 15 January 2013 - 11:39 PM

I think the Canucks should go a different way for filling in the holes and going for the cup. I would say they go after Perry and Getzlaf.

To Van:
Perry
Getzlaf

To Anaheim:

Schroeder
Raymond
Booth
another(prospect or player from a leafs trade plus pick)
4 Conditional 1st round picks

Then our Lines would be

Sedin-Sedin-Kesler-
Burrows-Getzlaf-Perry
Higgins-Lappy-Hansen
Wiese-Manny-Kassian

Bieksa-Hamhuis
Edler-Tanev
Garrison-Ballard

Barker


Schneider
Backup


What do you guys think? Just something new.
  • 0

#2 AriGold

AriGold

    Hairy Old

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,156 posts
  • Joined: 09-June 12

Posted 15 January 2013 - 11:41 PM

I think the Canucks should go a different way for filling in the holes and going for the cup. I would say they go after Perry and Getzlaf.

To Van:
Perry
Getzlaf

To Anaheim:

Schroeder
Raymond
Booth
another(prospect or player from a leafs trade plus pick)
4 Conditional 1st round picks


I'm very interested in this deal as i think its well done. 1 question is the condition of the four 1st round picks.. Whats the condition ?

I especially like the prospect or player from the leafs in the phantom trade !!

Edit: Just realised Kesler plays the wing after this trade, Now i like it even more !!

Edited by AriGold, 15 January 2013 - 11:42 PM.

  • 0

Posted Image


#3 Danthecanucksfan

Danthecanucksfan

    Canucks Second-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,346 posts
  • Joined: 08-January 12

Posted 15 January 2013 - 11:42 PM

uhhh, you can't just give them 4 low first rounders, some subpar prospects/players we don't need in exchange for two stars, we would have to give up Edler and Jensen +

EDIT: I would be afraid that they would both decide not to sign with us, I like the idea of a trade that isn't with Toronto for once, but we would be taking a huge risk.

Edited by Danthecanucksfan, 15 January 2013 - 11:46 PM.

  • 2

#4 AriGold

AriGold

    Hairy Old

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,156 posts
  • Joined: 09-June 12

Posted 15 January 2013 - 11:44 PM

uhhh, you can't just give them 4 low first rounders, some subpar prospects/players we don't need in exchange for two stars, we would have to give up Edler and Jensen +++

Conditional picks sir, Which im assuming are on the condition that Perry and Getz re-sign.

Therefor you cant even include them in this trade lol...
  • 0

Posted Image


#5 Hamhuis2

Hamhuis2

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,881 posts
  • Joined: 07-July 11

Posted 15 January 2013 - 11:45 PM

I'm thinking this would work in NHL13...

Ignoring the obvious issues in that Anaheim gets a 2nd liner as the best player coming back, I'm pretty sure this would cause us to go over the cap limit.
  • 0
Chicago Blackhawks NHL 14 OCDC League 2013/2014

J. Schultz(81)-Toews(92)-Pacioretty(88)....Keith(90)-Phaneuf(87)................Crawford(86)
Burns(87)-Kadri(85)-Yakupov(83)..............Hjalmarson(85)-N. Schultz(84)....Khabby(76)
Clarkson(83)-Zibanejad(80)-Ennis(82).......Koska(78)-Murray(83)
Kobasew(78)-Hanszus(79)-Morin(76)

#6 Tanev

Tanev

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,122 posts
  • Joined: 19-December 05

Posted 15 January 2013 - 11:45 PM

I like the idea, but the trade would be more closer to:

To VAN:
Ryan Getzlaf
Corey Perry
Cam Fowler

To ANA:
Zack Kassian
Alex Edler
David Booth
Niklas Jensen
Chris Tanev
+ Conditional 1st if they each re-sign

Edited by Ḅatman, 15 January 2013 - 11:46 PM.

  • 0

#7 Nathan MacKinnon

Nathan MacKinnon

    Canucks Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,242 posts
  • Joined: 07-November 10

Posted 15 January 2013 - 11:46 PM

LOL, that's a rip off for Anaheim, they're not getting close to value for Perry and Getzlaf, two elite superstars, not just your everyday Joe.

but I guess it depends on what the conditions are.

this is a steal for us though, unless the conditional 4 1sts are basically guaranteed 4 1st round picks.
  • 0

+1 this post!

Posted Image

Credit to Intoewsables :wub: :wub: :wub:

Formerly known as UMADBRO?

Luongo Supporter. Does not deserve any of this BS


#8 SkeeterHansen

SkeeterHansen

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,142 posts
  • Joined: 24-May 11

Posted 15 January 2013 - 11:47 PM

I doubt Anaheim would do it but I like the concept! Different than all the "Benn for Edler", "Luongo for Kadri, Gardiner" crap.
  • 0

/=S=/


#9 Rocket10

Rocket10

    K-Wing Prospect

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 7 posts
  • Joined: 14-January 13

Posted 15 January 2013 - 11:47 PM

Lol the leafs trade would be for Luongo. And the Condition would be on them resigning. There both UFA's at the end of the year, so the Ducks might lose them anyways. Or the ducks trade them and get both back you never know, thats why there was a 4 conditional lol. maybe 2 conditional with 2 guaranteed
  • 0

#10 Pineapples

Pineapples

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,165 posts
  • Joined: 15-June 10

Posted 15 January 2013 - 11:48 PM

You're all forgetting the cap.
  • 0

Pineapple_jumps.gifPineapple_jumps.gif

 


#11 Danthecanucksfan

Danthecanucksfan

    Canucks Second-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,346 posts
  • Joined: 08-January 12

Posted 15 January 2013 - 11:50 PM

Conditional picks sir, Which im assuming are on the condition that Perry and Getz re-sign.

Therefor you cant even include them in this trade lol...


LOL

Shroeder
raymond
Booth
and a Toronto prospect and pick

for

Getzlaf and Perry

?!?!?!??!? And what if they both decided they were going to go play for another team. Vancouver loses Schroeder, Booth etc.
And more importantly Aneheim loses their two stars for sub-par prospects, a 2nd liner and a pick. So not worth the risk for either side.
  • 0

#12 Hamhuis2

Hamhuis2

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,881 posts
  • Joined: 07-July 11

Posted 15 January 2013 - 11:50 PM

Don't want Getzlaf if we have Hank and Kesler still here. Counter proposal just for Perry:

Booth+Tanev+Jensen(a lot to give up but that's what it would take IMO)

for

Perry

Canucks get a bonafide star, a top-line two-way forward who can score. Would easily hit 45+ goals with the Sedins.

Anaheim gets a good defensive dman prospect who can play in their top-6 right now. I'm thinking a Tanev-Fowler pairing would be good in the future. They also get a 2nd liner in Booth who in theory fills in for Perry right now. Jensen is another great forward prospect to help them in the near future with Selanne and Koivu aging.

If I were the Canucks, I'd try to offer Schroeder (or even Gaunce though I like him a lot) instead of Jensen, but if he is a deal breaker, we're trying to win the cup now, so I'd still probably do it.
  • 0
Chicago Blackhawks NHL 14 OCDC League 2013/2014

J. Schultz(81)-Toews(92)-Pacioretty(88)....Keith(90)-Phaneuf(87)................Crawford(86)
Burns(87)-Kadri(85)-Yakupov(83)..............Hjalmarson(85)-N. Schultz(84)....Khabby(76)
Clarkson(83)-Zibanejad(80)-Ennis(82).......Koska(78)-Murray(83)
Kobasew(78)-Hanszus(79)-Morin(76)

#13 Rocket10

Rocket10

    K-Wing Prospect

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 7 posts
  • Joined: 14-January 13

Posted 15 January 2013 - 11:51 PM

No i didn't forget the Cap, Raymond and booth r combined for 6.5 plus we would need to trade luongo and include whatever we get back from the leafs.
  • 0

#14 Rocket10

Rocket10

    K-Wing Prospect

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 7 posts
  • Joined: 14-January 13

Posted 15 January 2013 - 11:54 PM

I would give up 4 conditional picks if we got to resign both of them
  • 0

#15 thad

thad

    Canucks Second-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,213 posts
  • Joined: 09-February 09

Posted 15 January 2013 - 11:55 PM

Only if they throw in Jeff Deslauriers. He has to be part of the deal. If he's a no go, we take Daniel Winnik and they take 200k of his cap hit.
  • 0

#16 Rocket10

Rocket10

    K-Wing Prospect

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 7 posts
  • Joined: 14-January 13

Posted 16 January 2013 - 12:04 AM

I can see that happening.
  • 0

#17 Pears

Pears

    Canucks All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,479 posts
  • Joined: 14-November 11

Posted 16 January 2013 - 12:05 AM

You know what, I think I would do this. Although I don't think Anaheim would do this (albiet the 4 conditional 1sts), how about this revision/counter proposal?

To Vancouver: Erik Gudbranson

To Florida: Roberto Luongo, Mason Raymond, 2013 2nd, Yann Sauve

Probably not enough but I think it might go through

then

To Vancouver: Corey Perry, Ryan Getzlaf

To Anaheim: Alex Edler (new contract), David Booth, Chris Tanev or Keith Ballard (Anaheim's choice), Jannik Hansen, 2013 & 2014 1st

I think Anaheim would strongly consider that deal since they would almost solidify their defense by adding Edler.
  • 0

In my eyes drouin is overrated he can score in the qmjhl but did nothing in last two gold medal games that canada lost. Fox will be better pro than him talk to me in five yrs

Gaudreau has one NHL goal whereas all your "prized" prospects have none.

   ryan kesler is going to the chicago blackhawks ...       quote me on it


#18 Rocket10

Rocket10

    K-Wing Prospect

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 7 posts
  • Joined: 14-January 13

Posted 16 January 2013 - 12:13 AM

That would work but i would rather keep Edler especially with a new contract. Instead give ballard and tanev and schroder. Once they lose Getzlaf and Perry they will be in rebuilding mode.
  • 0

#19 Aladeen

Aladeen

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,472 posts
  • Joined: 22-September 07

Posted 16 January 2013 - 01:08 AM

I think the Canucks should go a different way for filling in the holes and going for the cup. I would say they go after Perry and Getzlaf.

To Van:
Perry
Getzlaf

To Anaheim:

Schroeder
Raymond
Booth
another(prospect or player from a leafs trade plus pick)
4 Conditional 1st round picks

Then our Lines would be

Sedin-Sedin-Kesler-
Burrows-Getzlaf-Perry
Higgins-Lappy-Hansen
Wiese-Manny-Kassian

Bieksa-Hamhuis
Edler-Tanev
Garrison-Ballard

Barker


Schneider
Backup


What do you guys think? Just something new.

Sweet I didn't realize under the new CBA the salary cap doesn't pertain to the Canucks!!!
  • 0
Posted Image

#20 Aladeen

Aladeen

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,472 posts
  • Joined: 22-September 07

Posted 16 January 2013 - 01:16 AM

Edit: nm could work I guess but I don't think Anaheim does it and the Canucks are screwed if they don't win the cup this year.


  • 0
Posted Image

#21 Rocket10

Rocket10

    K-Wing Prospect

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 7 posts
  • Joined: 14-January 13

Posted 16 January 2013 - 07:36 PM

Sweet I didn't realize under the new CBA the salary cap doesn't pertain to the Canucks!!!


Thats what the Luongo trade was for to the leafs
  • 0

#22 palindrom

palindrom

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,072 posts
  • Joined: 09-December 10

Posted 16 January 2013 - 10:41 PM

cap wise, i am not sure your proposal works
  • 0
Posted Image Was too much for me!

Instead im reading English grammar for advanced dummies





#23 Aladeen

Aladeen

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,472 posts
  • Joined: 22-September 07

Posted 16 January 2013 - 10:49 PM

cap wise, i am not sure your proposal works

Initially I thought that too but worked it out at capgeek and it would all fit under the cap, for this season.
  • 0
Posted Image





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.