Lockhart Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 He was going to get sent back soon anyway. If Ebbett was put on waivers somebody would have probably claimed him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wshdrvvn Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 I've run the gambit of emotions on this but instead of crying on the forums i did some reading. as a hockey fan this decision seems like it should only be about hockey. and if that were the case (meaning contracts weren't a thing) barker gets sent down 10 times out of 10. We all know contracts are indeed real soo what we're left with is something of a head scrathcer at the moment. So if you've already hit the panic button (which reading through, most have) try to realize booth and kesler's salaries are still against our cap. jordan can't get plucked off waivers, its not worth risking a healthy versatile ebbett or anyone else just to have JS in the season opener. kes and maybe booth will be put on LTIR there will be cap space. he will be back and he will play some games. come back from that ledge my friends. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dilly Canuck Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 Ebbett or Schroeder... Hmmm... Can i pick option 3? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Provost Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 As one poster astutely said, this may just be cap management, where Booth and Kes are put on LTIR tomorrow and he's 'brought back up' ...when he really didn't even go to Chi.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canuck Surfer Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 Yes, and so much so that they had a surplus of great young players whom they did not have room on the roster for. So rather than rot them; they turned two superb players into an even more useful veteran Richards. (and they did not trade them for prospects who would not help them for a year or two...) You realize that the vast majority of their roster was developed from within right? Brown,bernier, Clifford, Doughty, Kopitar, Lewis, Loktionov, Martinez, Nolan, Parse, Quick, and Voynov were all drafted and developed by L.A. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elvis15 Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 AFAIK, Canucks will have Kesler and Booth on their roster to start the season, and THEN put them on LTIR. This maximizes the amount of cap relief they will get. So as soon as the paperwork for that is done, it would not surprise me to see Schroeder back on the team immediately. He may have not even leave Vancouver. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DIBdaQUIB Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 Whomever didn't see that coming is blind. As much as I want Schroeder with the big club I knew AV would go with Ebbett. What a blow to the kids confidence though. AV is making a mistake Imo.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BananaMash Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 Schroeder's going to be back up as soon as the team places Booth on LTIR in my opinion. There's no way Gillis would allow AV to play Ebbett over him in that role after seeing their play in camp. This is all strategic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 If we wanted to bring Schroeder right back up after, we'd either have to put someone else on IR or send them down to get them off the roster. IF anyone wants to explain how it would work differently, I'm happy to listen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEAN HARNETT Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 Stupid move. He was awesome in the inter squad games. He deserves atleast a look, sheesh! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattJVD Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 Didn't Ebbett play on a line with Perry and Getzlaf at one point? maybe this is just for the anahiem game? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wshdrvvn Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 Didn't Ebbett play on a line with Perry and Getzlaf at one point? maybe this is just for the anahiem game? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Vintage Canuck- Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 Damn, I wanted to see Ray-Schroe-Kass line to start off the season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeanBeef Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 Given his vet status, he would have been subject to re-entry waivers if we were to call him up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eretz canucks Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 It's the Corrado situation all over again. What's the point of inviting the guy to camp if no matter what he does he can't make the team? **** me. What a joke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheCammer Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 we have 24 roster player and one needed to be send down until someone on LTIR...typical cdc panic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peaches Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 Wow. Schroeder seems to have excellent chemistry with Kas and MayRay. Can't believe they did this. So stupid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elvis15 Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 Exactly. I see Barker, Vandermeer, or Volpatti being put on waivers so that they can go to the Wolves. The likihood of them getting claimed after teams rosters are set goes way down. It has never been this teams practice to carry 9 D-men though. That's kind of overkill. If we were to have an injury up front now, we would have to put a D-man on waivers, wait for him to clear, and then call up a forward. It seems more logical to just carry an extra forward and two extra D. Unless of course Vandermeer is our fourth line option. That seems less than ideal though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canuck Surfer Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 Kesler looked pretty good baggin groceries in N Van! ... means one of two things... kesler will be back soon or a second line center is coming to van soon via trade or signing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Provost Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 The likihood of them getting claimed after teams rosters are set goes way down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.