Mr. Ambien Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 If we do make one gun thread, what will the maker of 20,000 gun threads do now!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lockout Casualty Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 Actual cops lose their guns quite frequently, a recent example being an RCMP officer in Mississauga. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Ambien Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 Actual cops lose their guns quite frequently, a recent example being an RCMP officer in Mississauga. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bertuzzi Babe Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 Oh hey, trained professionals who are armed for a living lose their guns all the time. Let's have more guns people can treat irresponsibly. What a brilliant position! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lockout Casualty Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 To prevent cops from losing guns, cops should be unarmed. Guns are evil, not people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bertuzzi Babe Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 Still pushing your strawman arguments I see. What a joke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Ambien Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 Still pushing your strawman arguments I see. What a joke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bertuzzi Babe Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 Back in the real world, Since 1968, "more Americans have died from gunfire than died in … all the wars of this country's history." Mark Shields on Friday, December 21st, 2012 in the PBS NewsHour http://www.politifac...re-killed-guns/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lockout Casualty Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 See post above the one you quoted, you'll notice a caricature that's just as much a joke. I was just following along with the theme. Cops lose guns, so do security guards. That was a relevant point to which you went off on your tangent. Of course, the outrage is because it's an armed guard in a school. Big deal, nothing happened. It could be a cop losing it in a public restroom where children frequent. It's careless all the same, but it's news here for obvious reasons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Ambien Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 Back in the real world, Since 1968, "more Americans have died from gunfire than died in … all the wars of this country's history." Mark Shields on Friday, December 21st, 2012 in the PBS NewsHour http://www.politifac...re-killed-guns/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bertuzzi Babe Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 Not because it's a weapon left carelessly around children. Right. What a joke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lockout Casualty Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 http://www.politifac...murdered-knive/ "Reality" strikes again. And relevant point was that cops leave their guns too, which certainly children are susceptible to finding.. to which you went off on typical tangent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Ambien Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 So instead of addressing my post, you post a non sequitur about hands and feet killing more than rifles? You haven't the first clue on how to argue something, do you? A tangent? There's less point in debating with you on this than with Electro Rock on socialism. Please put me on ignore like you do everyone else who makes minced meat of your arguments. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tearloch7 Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 "Non sequitor" and "ad hominem" both used in the same sentence .. is that not considered one of the greatest grammatical goofs that Latin will allow? .. Edit: Well paragraph .. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bertuzzi Babe Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 "Non sequitor" and "ad hominem" both used in the same sentence .. is that not considered one of the greatest grammatical goofs that Latin will allow? .. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lockout Casualty Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 Really? Non sequitur? Not your tangent about how many people are killed with guns? There were no murders here, no deaths, not even a shooting. A guy left a gun.. stupid, dangerous.. but nothing happened. You should re-assess what non sequitur is, especially in light of what direction you pull a conversation off to. Carry on with the ad hominem against myself and other members. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Ambien Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 Says the guy who constantly demeans CDC as a whole and insults anyone whose opinion is different? What a joke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jägermeister Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 Large scale explosives also kill less people in the US than knives, so I guess they shouldn't be restricted at all either right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tearloch7 Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 Large scale explosives also kill less people in the US than knives, so I guess they shouldn't be restricted at all either right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Navyblue Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 http://www.politifac...murdered-knive/ "Reality" strikes again. And relevant point was that cops leave their guns too, which certainly children are susceptible to finding.. to which you went off on typical tangent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.