Sundin Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 Trade #1 - Van and Florida Van - Luongo Florida - Upshall, Bjugstad, Clemmenson Trade #2 - Van and NYI Van - Ballard, Raymond, Clemmenson NYI - Bailey, Viznovsky, Nabokov Sign - Arnott for 1 yr $2 million Trade #3 - Van and ANA Van - Bailey, Upshall, 1st 2014 ANA - Ryan D. Sedin H. Sedin Ryan Booth Arnott/Kesler Burrows Higgins Lapierre Kassian Weise Malhotra Hansen Hamhuis Bieska Edler Garrison Viznovsky Tanev Barker Vandermeer Alberts Schneider Nabokov CAP $68,800,000 (Kesler out 18+ games, Booth out 10 games) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolf smell Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 Wow that's a lotta trades! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Mind Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 Why would we want Vishnovsky? He clearly wants to stay in the KHL. Even still, NYI has no reason to do it. They would rather have Bailey and Nabokov over Raymond and Clemmonson. So to them, it's Ballard and a couple of downgrades. I also don't think ANA would make that deal. Ryan can get a better return for them imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smashian Kassian Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 Not a big fan of either deal, especially the NYI one, I doubt FLA would give up Bjugstad anyways that seems clear. then the ANA trade would never be accepted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 1st trade: Its alright, I'd do it 2nd trade: Meh 3rd trade: LOL. You think Anaheim will give Ryan up for that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elvis15 Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 Since when have you heard of a team trading for a player then trading him again in another deal, let alone trading for a player then trading him away, then trading the return from that player away to get another piece. Highly unlikely, and way too many moves that aren't accepted by both teams involved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peace Bond Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 Since when have you heard of a team trading for a player then trading him again in another deal, let alone trading for a player then trading him away, then trading the return from that player away to get another piece. Highly unlikely, and way too many moves that aren't accepted by both teams involved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canuck Surfer Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 Fun conversation, each level on the sharp edge just over reality! This pretty much steals Bailey, then steals in more epic proportions Ryan. Anyone else reckon that Lou and Ballard would get us Ryan; let alone allow us Bjugstad for free? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarchandSucks Posted January 21, 2013 Share Posted January 21, 2013 The Florida deal would be unlikely. NYI deal has no chance. Ana deal Murray dies from laughing too hard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.