-Vintage Canuck- Posted January 21, 2013 Share Posted January 21, 2013 @WharnsbyCBC: Van places Jim Vandermeer on waivers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lonny_Bohonos_14 Posted January 21, 2013 Share Posted January 21, 2013 Was just coming here to post that: Elliotte Friedman @FriedgeHNIC Vandermeer (VAN) on waivers today. Guess Schroeder is coming back up? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Niloc009 Posted January 21, 2013 Share Posted January 21, 2013 YAY SCHROEDER (oh god I hope) (please AV/MG please) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CB007 Posted January 21, 2013 Share Posted January 21, 2013 Hope no one claims him. He really wants to play for us. But here comes Schroeder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Great Save Luongo!!! Posted January 21, 2013 Share Posted January 21, 2013 I guess I'll be redundant and say how this means Schroeder is coming up. Hope he doesn't get picked off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Topshelfer Posted January 21, 2013 Share Posted January 21, 2013 Vandermeer: 2 Games in, no game action, didn't even break a sweat, Story of my life! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ripsh0w Posted January 21, 2013 Share Posted January 21, 2013 Yep, Schroeder is comin up! No source, just simple math Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CB007 Posted January 21, 2013 Share Posted January 21, 2013 Vandermeer: 2 Games in, no game action, didn't even break a sweat, Story of my life! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted January 21, 2013 Share Posted January 21, 2013 Really hope he doesn't get plucked Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dilly Canuck Posted January 21, 2013 Share Posted January 21, 2013 Don't really care if he gets claimed or not, I'm just excited for Schroeder's first potential game! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CB007 Posted January 21, 2013 Share Posted January 21, 2013 Don't really care if he gets claimed or not, I'm just excited for Schroeder's first potential game! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lui's Knob Posted January 21, 2013 Share Posted January 21, 2013 Why didn't they waive Barker? Vandermeer has a higher chance of getting picked up... BTW - How does the waivers work under the new CBA? If someone snatches him, do the Canucks get first claim for the next eligible waiver player? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LindenTheLegend Posted January 21, 2013 Share Posted January 21, 2013 Its smarter to send Vandermer down because he is on a two-way contract so the Canucks have to pay him less money if he is playing in the AHL. Also with Alberts you have the same kind of player, I still think we should move Alberts for a late round pick, jsut because of his cap hit compared to Vandermeer and Barker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris_P Posted January 21, 2013 Share Posted January 21, 2013 Don't think Vandermeer would have done any more harm then Ballard this weekend. At least he's intimidating a bit. Would rather have seen Barker or Volpatti waived, but, that's just me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LindenTheLegend Posted January 21, 2013 Share Posted January 21, 2013 Don't think Vandermeer would have done any more harm then Ballard this weekend. At least he's intimidating a bit. Would rather have seen Barker or Volpatti waived, but, that's just me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The-Impersonator Posted January 21, 2013 Share Posted January 21, 2013 I don't know. I read that the guy has been lodging in Vancouver for months for a contract. Hopefully he gets some game action. If for nothing else but to prove that he ain't got it any more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Millerdraft Posted January 21, 2013 Share Posted January 21, 2013 Why didn't they waive Barker? Vandermeer has a higher chance of getting picked up... BTW - How does the waivers work under the new CBA? If someone snatches him, do the Canucks get first claim for the next eligible waiver player? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
86Viking Posted January 21, 2013 Share Posted January 21, 2013 too bad great veteran would rather put alberts on waivers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CB007 Posted January 21, 2013 Share Posted January 21, 2013 We do know that management wants them both and Vandemeer will likely take over Alberts' spot next year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
n00bxQb Posted January 21, 2013 Share Posted January 21, 2013 Vandermeer further elaborated: I'm so pissed when I get to the Wolves I'm gonna work really hard and break a Sweatt! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.