Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

-Vintage Canuck-

[Waivers] Jim Vandermeer

174 posts in this topic

@WharnsbyCBC: Van places Jim Vandermeer on waivers.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

YAY SCHROEDER (oh god I hope) (please AV/MG please)

3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hope no one claims him. He really wants to play for us.

But here comes Schroeder.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Vandermeer: 2 Games in, no game action, didn't even break a sweat, Story of my life! :sadno:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, Schroeder is comin up!

No source, just simple math

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Vandermeer: 2 Games in, no game action, didn't even break a sweat, Story of my life! :sadno:

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't really care if he gets claimed or not, I'm just excited for Schroeder's first potential game!

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't really care if he gets claimed or not, I'm just excited for Schroeder's first potential game!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why didn't they waive Barker? Vandermeer has a higher chance of getting picked up...

BTW - How does the waivers work under the new CBA? If someone snatches him, do the Canucks get first claim for the next eligible waiver player?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its smarter to send Vandermer down because he is on a two-way contract so the Canucks have to pay him less money if he is playing in the AHL. Also with Alberts you have the same kind of player, I still think we should move Alberts for a late round pick, jsut because of his cap hit compared to Vandermeer and Barker.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't think Vandermeer would have done any more harm then Ballard this weekend. At least he's intimidating a bit. Would rather have seen Barker or Volpatti waived, but, that's just me.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't think Vandermeer would have done any more harm then Ballard this weekend. At least he's intimidating a bit. Would rather have seen Barker or Volpatti waived, but, that's just me.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know. I read that the guy has been lodging in Vancouver for months for a contract. Hopefully he gets some game action. If for nothing else but to prove that he ain't got it any more.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why didn't they waive Barker? Vandermeer has a higher chance of getting picked up...

BTW - How does the waivers work under the new CBA? If someone snatches him, do the Canucks get first claim for the next eligible waiver player?

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

too bad great veteran would rather put alberts on waivers

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We do know that management wants them both and Vandemeer will likely take over Alberts' spot next year.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.