Jump to content

Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Photo

Truly Stunning: More Americans Killed by Guns Since '68 Than In All Wars Put Together


  • Please log in to reply
17 replies to this topic

#1 dudeone

dudeone

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 807 posts
  • Joined: 17-February 04

Posted 21 January 2013 - 07:41 PM

Truly Stunning: More Americans Killed by Guns Since '68 Than In All Wars Put Together

By tomasyn

SAT JAN 19, 2013 AT 08:01 AM PST

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/01/19/1180353/-Truly-Stunning-More-Americans-Killed-by-Guns-Since-68-Than-In-All-Wars-Put-Together

I'm motivated to write this diary by a diary that appears on the rec list calling my ignorance of gun nut culture "stunning". You want stunning? Try this on for size:



More than a million Americans have been killed by guns since 1968.

More than in the Revolutionary War, the Civil War, World Wars I and II, Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan and various smaller conflicts. Combined.


Edited by dudeone, 21 January 2013 - 07:42 PM.

  • 0

#2 Tortorella's Rant

Tortorella's Rant

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,089 posts
  • Joined: 11-April 12

Posted 21 January 2013 - 07:45 PM

Perhaps it's time to take a page out of Rick Perry's book and pray away the gun violence in America.



















Okay, I couldn't contain myself. What a joke LOL :lol: And this guy had a shot at becoming president?
  • 1
Posted Image

#3 WHL rocks

WHL rocks

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,615 posts
  • Joined: 09-May 10

Posted 21 January 2013 - 07:54 PM

Hmm Interesting but not surprising at all.

Russia lost the most in WW 2 (25 million) and were the ones who defeated Germany. America (400 k) loves to take credit but didn't enter the war until Germany was falling.

US lost around 60 k in Vietnam, less in Korea around 40 k.
  • 0

#4 pimpcurtly

pimpcurtly

    Canucks Franchise Player

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,366 posts
  • Joined: 19-September 06

Posted 21 January 2013 - 07:56 PM

Where does it say how many people guns protected huh? ....HUH?!?
  • 0
Posted Image

#5 :D

:D

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 20,703 posts
  • Joined: 14-August 03

Posted 21 January 2013 - 07:59 PM

Not Truly Stunning: Another dudeone gun news thread.
  • 2

#6 canucklax

canucklax

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,768 posts
  • Joined: 08-July 09

Posted 21 January 2013 - 08:00 PM

It makes sense when you realize the population growth. In the revolutionary war, 1 in 20 white males* were killed, but since the population was so low at the time, the number comes out to 4000 ish deaths, which is equivalent to 3 million killed by today's population.http://www.shmoop.co...statistics.html
*Given the social customs at the time, this would be the population of men eligible to fight

I don't want to downplay the problem, but stats can be misleading.

Edited by canucklax, 21 January 2013 - 08:03 PM.

  • 1

6xFRVi3.png

Credit to bananamash for the sig. Credit to torts for being stubborn

Bring Back the Totems!
NHLSL Winnipeg Jets


#7 Bertuzzi Babe

Bertuzzi Babe

    Canucks Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,239 posts
  • Joined: 03-May 03

Posted 21 January 2013 - 08:02 PM

Very informative post with proof of claim. Thanks! :)
  • 2

"Sursumredditio" non usquam in hac mea loquantur!



Ense petit placidam sub libertate quietem.....



#8 Charlie.the.Unicorn

Charlie.the.Unicorn

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,398 posts
  • Joined: 10-July 07

Posted 21 January 2013 - 08:10 PM

What about the Americans killed by guns in wars? Do those count?
  • 0

#9 Ghostsof1915

Ghostsof1915

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 22,672 posts
  • Joined: 31-January 07

Posted 21 January 2013 - 08:29 PM


  • 1
GO CANUCKS GO!
"The Canucks did not lose in 1994. They just ran out of time.." Barry MacDonald Team1040

Posted Image

#10 Common sense

Common sense

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,672 posts
  • Joined: 08-January 06

Posted 21 January 2013 - 08:49 PM

Not Truly Stunning: Another dudeone gun news thread.


Quel surprise.
  • 0

#11 Garrison

Garrison

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 851 posts
  • Joined: 04-July 12

Posted 21 January 2013 - 11:32 PM

Classic USA.
  • 0

#12 Lancaster

Lancaster

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,412 posts
  • Joined: 03-September 12

Posted 21 January 2013 - 11:50 PM

Maybe this just proves how much more effective the US military is vs other countries, lol.
  • 0

#13 Buddhas Hand

Buddhas Hand

    Canucks Second-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,854 posts
  • Joined: 19-December 11

Posted 22 January 2013 - 01:13 AM

Hmm Interesting but not surprising at all.

Russia lost the most in WW 2 (25 million) and were the ones who defeated Germany. America (400 k) loves to take credit but didn't enter the war until Germany was falling.

US lost around 60 k in Vietnam, less in Korea around 40 k.



My father who fought at D-day says hello , so do the millions of allied troops who flew , sailed and fought in europe.

And also the brits payed for and sent millions of tons of military supplies to Russia on the kola run , where an icy death waited for many a sailor .
  • 0

The Real war is not between the east and the west. The real war is between intelligent and stupid people.

Marjane Satrapi

tony-abbott-and-stephen-harper-custom-da

That men do not learn very much from the lessons of history is the most important of all the lessons that history has to teach.

Aldous Huxley.


#14 WHL rocks

WHL rocks

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,615 posts
  • Joined: 09-May 10

Posted 22 January 2013 - 01:39 AM

My father who fought at D-day says hello , so do the millions of allied troops who flew , sailed and fought in europe.

And also the brits payed for and sent millions of tons of military supplies to Russia on the kola run , where an icy death waited for many a sailor .


Its a touchy subject. My family members also served in WW2 under the British flag.

Soviet Union lost far more ppl than all the allied countries combined, approx 25 million and 14 % of population. US lost 400 k and less than 1/2 of 1%. Canada lost more per capita than US.

It's a fact the Americans spent most of WW2 sending in aid. They didn't enter the war until Pearl Harbor which was 4 years after the war started. Even then they fought Japan, not Germany.

US didn't get into a head to head fight with Germans until end of 1943 in Africa. D day landings were about 6 months later 1944. By now the Germans were essentially defeated by the Russians. The war ended in 1945.

Stalin had continuously asked America to enter the Euro front against Germany but Roosevelt refused and only sent in aid.
  • 0

#15 Buddhas Hand

Buddhas Hand

    Canucks Second-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,854 posts
  • Joined: 19-December 11

Posted 22 January 2013 - 01:58 AM

Its a touchy subject. My family members also served in WW2 under the British flag.

Soviet Union lost far more ppl than all the allied countries combined, approx 25 million and 14 % of population. US lost 400 k and less than 1/2 of 1%. Canada lost more per capita than US.

It's a fact the Americans spent most of WW2 sending in aid. They didn't enter the war until Pearl Harbor which was 4 years after the war started. Even then they fought Japan, not Germany.

US didn't get into a head to head fight with Germans until end of 1943 in Africa. D day landings were about 6 months later 1944. By now the Germans were essentially defeated by the Russians. The war ended in 1945.

Stalin had continuously asked America to enter the Euro front against Germany but Roosevelt refused and only sent in aid.


Totally agree with the content of your post , stalin nearly matched their losses again with his various purges.

The russians would have never beaten the germans on their own , according to some reports , the germans were about 6 months to a year away from having the atomic bomb , and they already had a delivery device for it , the V2 rocket.
  • 0

The Real war is not between the east and the west. The real war is between intelligent and stupid people.

Marjane Satrapi

tony-abbott-and-stephen-harper-custom-da

That men do not learn very much from the lessons of history is the most important of all the lessons that history has to teach.

Aldous Huxley.


#16 Scott Hartnell's Mane

Scott Hartnell's Mane

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,211 posts
  • Joined: 14-December 12

Posted 22 January 2013 - 08:30 AM

In what universe is this revelation "truly stunning?" I should think it falls more under the category of "duh".
  • 0
Posted Image

View PostScott Hartnell, on 11 June 2013 - 02:11 PM, said:

Well I tell you what Heretic..if Tim Tebow becomes Terry Bradshaw I will shave off all my hair, convert to Christianity, go into the ministry and become a preacher.

#17 Electro Rock

Electro Rock

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,633 posts
  • Joined: 17-March 04

Posted 22 January 2013 - 09:54 AM

The Soviets did handle 75% of the fighting vs the 3rd Reich, however the weaknesses in their system were to blame for their ludicrous casualty figures, a system that would ultimately kill just as many of its own people in "peacetime".

What's more is that the Soviets were heaviliy responsible for the Nazis being so strong in the first place, the plan was to have Germany fight itself and the rest of Europe to exhaustion, then roll in with the Red Army for the enormous backstab, only they never foresaw how easily continental Europe would fall, and ended up getting backstabbed themselves.

  • 0
"The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the name of 'liberalism' they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation, without knowing how it happened."

Norman Thomas

#18 Zamboni_14

Zamboni_14

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,550 posts
  • Joined: 20-January 03

Posted 22 January 2013 - 10:46 AM

The Soviets did handle 75% of the fighting vs the 3rd Reich, however the weaknesses in their system were to blame for their ludicrous casualty figures, a system that would ultimately kill just as many of its own people in "peacetime".

What's more is that the Soviets were heaviliy responsible for the Nazis being so strong in the first place, the plan was to have Germany fight itself and the rest of Europe to exhaustion, then roll in with the Red Army for the enormous backstab, only they never foresaw how easily continental Europe would fall, and ended up getting backstabbed themselves.


I don't mean to make a joke about WW2 or the above post... but is anyone else picturing a WWE fight when reading this?

"Britten and Germany are going toe-to-toe in the ring. France was laid out much earlier and is still laying on the mat out cold. Meanwhile Japan is still waiting for the US to show up and try to interfere in the match for Britten. Wait... HERE COMES RUSSIA! What are they doing here? Better yet, who's side are they on? They are carrying a chair to the ring, but we don't know who they'll help yet. And Japan has left assuming the US is staying in the back this time. Russia with the chair... wait.. the chair says "Made in the USA" on it! Russia hits Germany with the chair... and here comes the US finally.... JAPAN... JAPAN attacks from behind.. US never saw it coming!"
  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.