• Announcements

    • StealthNuck

      Forum-specific Rules   07/11/2017

      These are board specific rules for the Trades and Rumors forum designed to provide organization and a better experience for everyone. Please review these rules before posting new threads. 
        THREAD ETIQUETTE   1. Please search for an existing thread before posting. This forum can be very fast moving, so it's understandable if redundant threads are inadvertently posted. In such a case, please use the report feature to request removal of redundant threads.    2. Provide a clearly identifiable topic title so that users can readily understand the content. The title should include any and all teams involved, as well as player names or other personnel involved as appropriate.   3. All trades, signings, rumors and other news MUST include a linkable source. Simply posting the name of the source is not enough. Effort should also be made to copy and paste the full article, or at the very least the relevant portion of text from the source to the first post of the thread. Moderators may remove low-quality threads in favour of high-quality threads. 

      Affixed to the front of your title should be a label that identifies the type of transaction that is taking place. For all trades use [TRADE]. For all signings use [SIGNING]. For all waiver-wire transactions use [WAIVERS]. For all rumours use [RUMOUR].
      For articles or news items that don't fit into the above categories, affix an appropriate label of your choice such as [NEWS], [ARTICLE] or [MISC].   4. When the status of a thread changes a new thread can be created. The new thread should reflect the change and help focus the discussion on current events. e.g. Someone may create a new thread when a rumor becomes a trades. The old thread will be locked by the moderating team.    5. Do not misrepresent the contents of your thread or post false trades or rumors. Trolling will result in a permanent suspension. 

      SOURCES   The following source types are considered INVALID. Any links to posts or threads on other message boards Any links to personal blogs Any news heard on the radio that does not have a link to an audio vault or podcast Any news seen on television that does not have a link to online video Any news spread by word of mouth
      Additionally, certain sources may be be blacklisted due to poor credentials, clear traffic-mongering etc. Blacklisted sources will be posted here. 
      Thank you for your co-operation and please PM the Administrator or Moderators if you have any questions, concerns or suggestions regarding this forum.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Templeton Peck

[Discussion] Roberto Luongo Trade Thread 5.0

Recommended Posts

that's rich, luo is an all star, a gold medal winning Olympian who has been to the SCF. Who is Fasth- career NHL games = 2

You funny guy!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Brouwer

2013 first

wilson (the least potential of their 3 big forward prospects)

Luongo

-we finally solve the dilemma and the headache of a controversy, get his money off the books, we get younger and tougher, a cup winner and some help for the future. A bit of an underpayment but worth it IMO

heck I'd toss in Rodin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Brouwer

2013 first

wilson (the least potential of their 3 big forward prospects)

Luongo

-we finally solve the dilemma and the headache of a controversy, get his money off the books, we get younger and tougher, a cup winner and some help for the future. A bit of an underpayment but worth it IMO

heck I'd toss in Rodin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tossing in guys like Rodin & Ebbett won't change anything.

I can't see WSH giving two 1st rounders and a roster player. If we were offered Brouwer and a 1st, we should take it and run.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Brouwer

2013 first

wilson (the least potential of their 3 big forward prospects)

Luongo

-we finally solve the dilemma and the headache of a controversy, get his money off the books, we get younger and tougher, a cup winner and some help for the future. A bit of an underpayment but worth it IMO

heck I'd toss in Rodin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

nube question here, but Luongo gets paid (not his cap hit) 6.375 per year currently and when he retires, he no longer gets paid. He is too egocentric to continue to play in the minors if someone waves him when he is old and crappy, so what is the main hung up over the contract? He max plays like 5-6 more years and that is an amount of money comparable to other great players.

What is the problem? I know I am missing something, just looking for some help.

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I still think it would be in our teams best interest to rotate our goalies every game. Keeps them fresh, keeps their trade appeal high assuming they both play great over the course of the year, which im sure they can do. I know its in our best interest to keep winning but I know both our goalies give us that chance every game. Even if they end the season playing approx 50/50 in 3 game spurts i think alternating them game by game is in the best of our club, and the most fair approach.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just can't take it anymore. King of the ES, you are a complete and total knob. Everything you say is beyond my comprehension for how shortsighted, dull, and incorrect it is. When brought up with facts, you either try to bring up other, irrelevant stats, or completely ignore them. I used to think that you were just a kid trying to rile up some people here, but now I realize that you're nothing short of pathetic neckbeard. Your behaviour and such is cringe-worthy if you're anything short of 13. You make stupid ass decisions and jump on every. Single. Bandwagon that you find with any sort of negativity.

Christ. Some people's children.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

nube question here, but Luongo gets paid (not his cap hit) 6.375 per year currently and when he retires, he no longer gets paid. He is too egocentric to continue to play in the minors if someone waves him when he is old and crappy, so what is the main hung up over the contract? He max plays like 5-6 more years and that is an amount of money comparable to other great players.

What is the problem? I know I am missing something, just looking for some help.

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

neuvirth and Bryz let in the ugliest goals of the night with the runners up Holtby and Theodore not far behind. Some of these guys look more like AHL all stars than NHLers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure why McPhee seems so committed to these crappy goalies? He doesn't have to g out and get Luongo, but any self respecting GM would go out and do something to upgrade that position.

Bernier is not the answer, he is less experienced than both WSH goalies in terms of playoff experience and less experienced than neuvirth in regular season action.

Way to go McPhee, stand idly by and watch your core of veterans lose a season due to pathetic goaltending

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Washington with another 5 GA...

Even if they're not going after Luongo they should probably do something..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The longest palindromic word in english is redivider, spells the same way forwards and backwards

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WSH owner is worth 1 Billion, which is on the lower end of NHL owners, maybe he is saying no to Luongo's contract and therefor they have made no inquiries about him

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.