Dragonfruits Posted February 4, 2013 Share Posted February 4, 2013 You mean MaJo? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merci Posted February 4, 2013 Share Posted February 4, 2013 Holtby is a perfect back up. Johannson is a perfect 3rd line C Brouwer is the 3rd line grit that will put us over the top. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cripplereh Posted February 4, 2013 Share Posted February 4, 2013 To me if I were MG I would put together two or three deals and forward to the caps Panthers TML's Flyers and tell all teams I have sent out deals to more then 2 teams and this is my final deal for you and see who bites first! That way you get what you want and play them back and forth for the next two days and tell them 1 day to think about it and get back to me.look over what deal is best then trade Luo.This way the other GM's will be calling each other and will know whom the teams are and one should bite by then and a deal is done.if none bite then keep Luo till trade deadline and put deals together for teams looking and get what he wants.I can't see us keeping two number ones till then and thats why I think MG has to do something sooner then later and get it done!Or Luo wnts to goto the panthers give them 24 hours then ask the others and tell luo a deal cant be done with them so move on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WHL rocks Posted February 4, 2013 Share Posted February 4, 2013 Holtby is a perfect back up. Johannson is a perfect 3rd line C Brouwer is the 3rd line grit that will put us over the top. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WHL rocks Posted February 4, 2013 Share Posted February 4, 2013 . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goal:thecup Posted February 4, 2013 Share Posted February 4, 2013 ?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
70seven Posted February 4, 2013 Share Posted February 4, 2013 Johansson is not imo a good player to fill the role of 3rd line C. He's under sized, and bad on faceoffs with a carreer avg of 42%. He is -7 in 7 games this year, with zero points, and zero hits. He does have some offensive upside, but the other downfalls of his game at the moment out weigh what he could potentially provide on the score sheet. Brouwer is a perfect fit. He's 27 years old 6'2" - 214lbs. Hes a -2, but has 3 goals, 4 points, and 21 hits in 7 games this season. He's also 50% on the draw after 48 attempts and is averaging 19 mins of ice thus far. Plus he's a local kid, and would likley be jacked to play here. Potentially having him on either the 2nd or 3rd line would give us added depth, and make the Canucks that much harder to play against. Brouwer, Forsberg, Neuvirth/Holtby would be SOLID return. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ilya Mikheyev Posted February 4, 2013 Share Posted February 4, 2013 Johansson is not imo a good player to fill the role of 3rd line C. He's under sized, and bad on faceoffs with a carreer avg of 42%. He is -7 in 7 games this year, with zero points, and zero hits. He does have some offensive upside, but the other downfalls of his game at the moment out weigh what he could potentially provide on the score sheet. Brouwer is a perfect fit. He's 27 years old 6'2" - 214lbs. Hes a -2, but has 3 goals, 4 points, and 21 hits in 7 games this season. He's also 50% on the draw after 48 attempts and is averaging 19 mins of ice thus far. Plus he's a local kid, and would likley be jacked to play here. Potentially having him on either the 2nd or 3rd line would give us added depth, and make the Canucks that much harder to play against. Brouwer, Forsberg, Neuvirth/Holtby would be SOLID return. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted February 4, 2013 Share Posted February 4, 2013 Agreed, get Brouwer over here.. Brouwer, prospect, goalie & a 2nd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ilya Mikheyev Posted February 4, 2013 Share Posted February 4, 2013 Brouwer, Kuznetsov, Holtby & a 2nd for Luongo? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merci Posted February 4, 2013 Share Posted February 4, 2013 Johansson is not imo a good player to fill the role of 3rd line C. He's under sized, and bad on faceoffs with a carreer avg of 42%. He is -7 in 7 games this year, with zero points, and zero hits. He does have some offensive upside, but the other downfalls of his game at the moment out weigh what he could potentially provide on the score sheet. Brouwer is a perfect fit. He's 27 years old 6'2" - 214lbs. Hes a -2, but has 3 goals, 4 points, and 21 hits in 7 games this season. He's also 50% on the draw after 48 attempts and is averaging 19 mins of ice thus far. Plus he's a local kid, and would likley be jacked to play here. Potentially having him on either the 2nd or 3rd line would give us added depth, and make the Canucks that much harder to play against. Brouwer, Forsberg, Neuvirth/Holtby would be SOLID return. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cdubuya Posted February 4, 2013 Share Posted February 4, 2013 If Washington (or any team for that matter) is in on one of our goalies I think the Canucks need to go big or go home. I don't want a 3rd line C. We have depth up the middle for when Henrik starts to decline. What would it take to pry ovi out of Washington. Schneider would be a huge chip. Booth may have some value if he comes back strong. Raymond and Hansen as well. I know that this isn't enough to land him but if you throw in enough of these pieces plus some of our better prospects plus however many firsts it would take to land him why not make a run? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
86Viking Posted February 4, 2013 Share Posted February 4, 2013 brouwer, perreault/wolski, conditionial 1st for luo raymond Brouwer is an upgrade over raymond without a doubt. I also wouldnt mind trying to get wolski from them somehow, he has good playmaking skills. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ossi Vaananen Posted February 4, 2013 Share Posted February 4, 2013 Am I the only one who has noticed that Galiev is in the ECHL right now? An injury also put him out for half of the 11-12 season. I'll pass as a thrown in or otherwise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sampy Posted February 4, 2013 Share Posted February 4, 2013 If Washington (or any team for that matter) is in on one of our goalies I think the Canucks need to go big or go home. I don't want a 3rd line C. We have depth up the middle for when Henrik starts to decline. What would it take to pry ovi out of Washington. Schneider would be a huge chip. Booth may have some value if he comes back strong. Raymond and Hansen as well. I know that this isn't enough to land him but if you throw in enough of these pieces plus some of our better prospects plus however many firsts it would take to land him why not make a run? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thad Posted February 4, 2013 Share Posted February 4, 2013 Forsberg is years away from making the NHL. And he's a winger We need Johanssen now, he isn't huge but he isn't tiny either. I am not sure how Forsberg makes us better than Johanssen, he'd be a better 3rd C than Schroeder thats for sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted February 4, 2013 Share Posted February 4, 2013 I agree. No more secondary players, trade a bigger package for elite. Backstrom would be the best target. Better all round player and cap friendlier. There no way The Caps are trading Brouwer. They just traded for him, signed him and is playing on their top line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sampy Posted February 4, 2013 Share Posted February 4, 2013 Wait, you just said Backstrom would be the best target then after that said there is no way the Caps trade Brouwer? Huh?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted February 4, 2013 Share Posted February 4, 2013 Sorry, meant to say Backstrom is their most valuable player and MG should at least ask. I don't think Backstrom or Brouwer are available. IMO MG should try for Forsberg and a goalie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldnews Posted February 4, 2013 Share Posted February 4, 2013 Forsberg is years away from making the NHL. And he's a winger We need Johanssen now, he isn't huge but he isn't tiny either. I am not sure how Forsberg makes us better than Johanssen, he'd be a better 3rd C than Schroeder thats for sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.