• Announcements

    • StealthNuck

      All Threads Must Contain Tags!   07/25/2017

      ALL THREADS MUST CONTAIN TAGS   All threads in this forum must contain tags prefixed to topic titles. The purpose of the tags is to eliminate confusion in recent threads lists, and to create an organized and consistent environment. Moderators may immediately lock and thread that does not contain tags.    Tags must be placed at the start of your thread title, following this exact formatting:    [Tag] Thread Title   Here are some of the most used popular tags:    [Proposal]
      A trade, or trades, for next season, or even the off-season.
      [Off-Season]
      FA signings, off-season trades for RFA's, UFA's rights etc...
      [Value Of]
      (A question regarding a players worth, whether from another team, or the Canucks)
      [Speculation] Posting a rumor (with a source of course), but providing why it could be possible for the Canucks to land that player.   [Discussion]
      Thoughts on team trading strategy and composition.   Please feel free to create your own tag if none of these suit your thread.   

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Teemu Selänne

[Proposal] Vancouver & Edmonton

Recommended Posts

To Edmonton: Yann Sauve + Future considerations

To Vancouver: Alex Plante

The facts:

- Plante & Sauve are both upcoming RFAs

- Sauve has a pro career high of 14 points in 39 AHL games with the Manitoba Moose

- Alex Plante has a pro career high of 17 points in 73 AHL games with the OKC Barons (But had 14 points in 41 AHL games last year)

- Plante has 10 NHL games experienced: 0 goals, 2 assists & -2

- Sauve has 5 NHL games experienced: 0 points & -2

- Sauve was drafted 41st overall in 2008 draft

- Plante was drafted 15th overall in the 2007 draft

- Plante is 6'3, 225 pounds and shoots right

- Yann Sauve is 6'3, 220 pounds and shoots left

Beyond the facts:

Plante was a higher rated player, but Sauve was drafted a year later and is a year younger. Both of their contracts are up this year. I think this makes their value similar.

Connauton, Joslin, Hunt, Sauve, Barker and Matheson all shoot left. So, Plante would bring a right-handed defenseman into the mix.

Sauve and Plante are both big defense first defenseman who are struggling with their current teams and might just need a change of scenery.

I'm a huge Gillis fan, and at the time I loved the pick of Yann Sauve, but I know Gillis is good at recognizing his mistakes and dealing with them.

This is basically a depth exchange for two players who might do better in new systems.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To Edmonton: Yann Sauve + Future considerations

To Vancouver: Alex Plante

The facts:

- Plante & Sauve are both upcoming RFAs

- Sauve has a pro career high of 14 points in 39 AHL games with the Manitoba Moose

- Alex Plante has a pro career high of 17 points in 73 AHL games with the OKC Barons (But had 14 points in 41 AHL games last year)

- Plante has 10 NHL games experienced: 0 goals, 2 assists & -2

- Sauve has 5 NHL games experienced: 0 points & -2

- Sauve was drafted 41st overall in 2008 draft

- Plante was drafted 15th overall in the 2007 draft

- Plante is 6'3, 225 pounds and shoots right

- Yann Sauve is 6'3, 220 pounds and shoots left

Beyond the facts:

Plante was a higher rated player, but Sauve was drafted a year later and is a year younger. Both of their contracts are up this year. I think this makes their value similar.

Connauton, Joslin, Hunt, Sauve, Barker and Matheson all shoot left. So, Plante would bring a right-handed defenseman into the mix.

Sauve and Plante are both big defense first defenseman who are struggling with their current teams and might just need a change of scenery.

I'm a huge Gillis fan, and at the time I loved the pick of Yann Sauve, but I know Gillis is good at recognizing his mistakes and dealing with them.

This is basically a depth exchange for two players who might do better in new systems.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I don't disagree that a change of scenery might do both players some good. However, I'm still not sold on this.

Sauve has not been able to crack a D line-up that has been reputed to be amongst the strongest in the league whereas Plante hasn't cracked the pack of nobodies the Oilers have trotted out on defense the last few years.

Just my opinion but I also haven't watched Plante enough since junior to form an educated opinion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I personally see Sauve having a higher ceiling than Plante, so I wouldn't do this, but I do see where you are coming from.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I personally see Sauve having a higher ceiling than Plante, so I wouldn't do this, but I do see where you are coming from.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd rather keep Sauve. I think he has enough upside to be better than a depth guy. The car accident set him back significantly.

Sauve has enough size and mobility to be a serviceable bottom pair player.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I honestly don't think Sauve will be a needed contribution for the Canucks. It would be better to package him in a multi-player trade.

He is not a bad prospect, but he is not overly good, either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.